PU - Girls Out West - All Activity

RE: Questions

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:54:33 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

10-12-09 04:54am

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (39)

To dingle (1):

I missed your reply until now, but better late than never I guess. Thanks for your input - and saving me the $25. Sounds like this is everything a site can do wrong with a good concept.

View Thread (2)

RE: Willard's Review

Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:56:23 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

10-08-09 08:56am

REVIEW REPLY by Willard (6)

To dracken (107):

I wish to express my gratitude of your giving advice to me.
I am writing the review with a translation software.
It apologizes for the thing that sentences that I write are not understood easily.
And, I do the effort to write a more detailed, more comprehensible review.
Thank you.

View Thread (2)

RE: Willard's Review

Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:22:03 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

10-08-09 08:22am

REVIEW REPLY by dracken (107)

To Willard (6):

Hmmm...this is an okay review, but I think you should use a bit more coherent sentences and give more general details. I'd say more about the browsing, search function, how the girls look in general, not just how you liked two models.. Also the conclusion could be fleshed out more, past I liked this site.

Sorry if I sounded too harsh...I shouldn't be, this is one of your first reviews and it's better than a lot I've seen. Keep it up and try to improve.

View Thread (2)

RE: Excellent Site!

Sun, 06 Sep 2009 09:36:02 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

09-06-09 09:36am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To Capn (11):

There are daily updates, Capn, but they used to drive me crazy, same as they do on most 21 sextury sites (a frustrated aside) .. instead of releasing a complete video they'll drag things out by presenting segments over a period of time. I know you're not into videos so this will be of limited interest to you.

Quite frankly, I cannot remember if they had a daily update when it came to pictures (I think they did), but not a multi-model one. Maybe someone else has a better memory. :-)

View Thread (4)

RE: Excellent Site!

Sun, 06 Sep 2009 02:43:04 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

09-06-09 02:43am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (11)

To messmer (57):

Thanks for the reply.

It sounds like it might well be worth a look for me.

:0)

How frequent are the updates?

View Thread (4)

RE: Excellent Site!

Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:43:06 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

09-05-09 06:43pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To Capn (11):

Naw, the videos are secondary even though they promote them because just about everybody loves videos. I didn't find the quality all that great when compared to other sites but their picture sets are very good if you don't mind the casual approach the photographer takes at times (her feet protruding into the picture etc.) and the grungy settings. I'd almost call it Hippie chic. :-)

View Thread (4)

RE: Excellent Site!

Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:02:38 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

09-05-09 06:02pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (11)

To messmer (57):

'BTW, one extra bonus for me: the picture sets are huge and for once many pics have been taken in a "landscape" format which I prefer. This allows me to weed out the "portraits" and still end up with a continuous set taking the model from fully clothed to completely naked. But, as stated, that's MY bonus, you may not care.'

Now that has got me interested.

I love full strip photosets, especially in landscape format. ;0)

Had a look at the tour & it is.....

Video this...video that! :0(

View Thread (4)

RE: Questions

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:47:12 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

08-11-09 08:47pm

COMMENT REPLY by dingle (1)

To RagingBuddhist (39):

Hi ya....

Today i thought i would give "Girls out west" and paid my membership and was very disapointed.
I was going to write a review also, but what i wanted to say has allready been pointed out.
I have gone though every page & the videos are BAD quailty even the new one's are not great (254mb most i saw) get past year 07 and dont even waste HDD space downloading un-watchable videos unless you set the screen very small and get ready to put your reading glasses on and squint very hard.
The boy/girl videos are a sham! 23 videos in main menu thats without the part 1 of 5 or 7 of 9 or what ever. The newest update is july 13th. Fair play to the boys under pressure,even their girlfriends cant get them hard again in a couple of videos, (The beach one springs to mind poor bloke or should i say poor people who just stroll past them on the beach.
Sometimes they even end without the "Money shot" ????
Whilst drinking my whiskey to numb my brain and trying not to think if it a such a waste of money $29.. i choked and spat my drink over my keyboard after finding a "Mum & daughter video" lol baking a cake & then starting to undress each other...*ughump holding back the sick* Im am now scared for life they could at least get a milf and a nice looking daughter.
This site should be called "Seaslugs out west" finding pretty women are rare here & should give members a discount if you stumble across any. From leaving "Abbywinters" to this site i would choose abbywinters anyday.

Q)I didn't see any mention of a download limit here. (A)Me too-not sure but DL lots and deleted most.
Q)What's the watermark look like? (A) OK, top left corner stays out of way though filming & not too big.
Q)TBP indicates that there are no full-length videos (A) The videos are broken up and scatterd around the site on diffrent release dates if you choose video tab.Part 1 could be released april part 2 may part 3 june, very broken up but they are 10 mins long or so,from 100mbs each (NEW-ISH)
Q) what are the server speeds like?(A)I have uber fast net but most i had was 345kbs but down loading 4 at a time took over 10 mins to download each one.
To be honest i would NEVER rejoin & would highly suggest this site is a waste of money.
This is just my thought after 1 day of membership.
I may write a review at the end of the month with detailed videos and so on...

Mr D

View Thread (2)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:37:55 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-31-09 04:37pm

REVIEW REPLY by BabyGetReal (13)

To messmer (57):

Sounds right -- points taken!

View Thread (6)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:28:15 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-30-09 06:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To BabyGetReal (13):

Always keep in mind that even people who appear to have the same taste can still have major differences of opinion when it comes to a site. Something in our brains seems to be triggered by certain faces or situations or positions or actions of the models. Even something they wear might bring back highly erotic memories .. and my brain might go WOW while yours might go BOOOORING! So don't trust too much. :-) What usually decides me is a combination of favorable review by TBP, PU (reviews and comments), and a tour of the site itself, before I subscribe to it. And, sadly, even after all that I get burned at times. Good hunting for THE site!

View Thread (6)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:01:52 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-30-09 05:01pm

REVIEW REPLY by BabyGetReal (13)

To messmer (57):

Yes, you warned me, and so did ramscrota. The site seemed so unusual I wanted to see it for myself. Once I get enough points that I can start to trust people, you'll be trusted for sure!

View Thread (6)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:00:28 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-30-09 05:00pm

REVIEW REPLY by BabyGetReal (13)

To mbaya (276):

I didn't spend much time with the photos, but I think they were pretty good within the philosophy of this site. Long dimension of photos were 800 px (early sets) to 2,000 pixels (recent sets). Photos were well lit, sharp, clear.

View Thread (6)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:25:16 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-30-09 04:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To BabyGetReal (13):

Didn't I warn you in some other thread about the quantity of b/g material? BTW, I agree with your present assessment, and their videos were never very good. I went mostly for the pictures.

View Thread (6)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:01:18 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-30-09 04:01pm

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (276)

To BabyGetReal (13):

I thought of this as a photo site. How are they? Often photo sites have weak videos.

View Thread (6)

RE: messmer's Review

Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:25:53 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-28-09 06:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To BabyGetReal (13):

Well, maybe you'll feel about GOW the way I felt about Anilos. After I had downloaded clips and videos of four of my favorite models I felt that I had gotten my money's worth. I know that you'll be able to download GOW's b/g clips in one day, but if you find something that really appeals to you then it will be worth it, won't it? Good luck. GOW is highly regarded by my because of the naturalness of its models!

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:19:34 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-28-09 06:19pm

REVIEW REPLY by BabyGetReal (13)

To messmer (57):

Thanks for the quick reply, messmer. Meanwhile, I looked at GOW's B/G trailers, and I love them. So I think I'll give it a go anyway. I assume that ramscrota's problem is a preference for more typical hardcore fastpaced banging, just what I don't like. But maybe ramscrota will comment, I hope.

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:13:12 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-28-09 06:13pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To BabyGetReal (13):

Hi, I would not subscribe to GOW for any g/b scenes. There's only a tiny number of them. In GOW's case I subscribed mainly for the g/solos and g/g contents so I can't comment on the quality of the b/g scenes.

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:57:38 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-28-09 04:57pm

REVIEW REPLY by BabyGetReal (13)

To messmer (57):

Hey, messmer, I am intrigued by your review of GOW. However, I mostly like b/g scenes, not so much g/g or solo. Ramscrota says "The BG scenes are pathetic". What do you have to say about the BG scenes (knowing my tastes from my profile, and the forum thread "against the grain"). What might be pathetic to some may be just my cup of tea. Thanks!

View Thread (14)

Girls Out West Comment

Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:17:25 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-19-09 05:17pm

COMMENT by RagingBuddhist (39)

Questions

Okay - I've heard things about GOW like messmer's "Abby's with spice before, and I'm definitely all about amateurs, so I'm pretty sure this is going to be my next signup. But I am curious about a few things.

I didn't see any mention of a download limit here and couldn't find anything on their tour about it, so... is there one?
What's the watermark look like? Is this one of those sites that likes to scream "This is ours!"?
Is it safe to assume it's download manager compatible? Along with that, what are the server speeds like?
TBP indicates that there are no full-length videos, so I'm curious how the scenes are broken up and what the average file sizes are.

Visit Girls Out West - View Replies - Add Reply

Girls Out West Comment

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:07:16 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

04-28-09 09:07am

COMMENT by messmer (57)

And A Year Later!

This is my third time with this site and disillusionment is starting to creep in. Only five days into the new subscription and I am all caught up because updates have been minimal.

There are normally two listed for every day (one picture set, one video), problem is that the video update is simply another segment and not the whole. Sometimes it is even a re-mastered segment of an old video.

Having been a member of many other sites in the meantime it is really starting to annoy me that a complete video still isn't available with one click. If they want to drag out their updates that way, fine, but why couldn't old videos be combined and available as a whole.

Many of the new models, too, (and there aren't that many) are not as appealing as those of the past. THAT might be a matter of personal taste but this site, in my eyes, has gone from WOW to ho-hum. Too bad because it was my favorite. I attempted to change the score on my previous review but it is past its editing date and I don't feel much like writing a new one, so consider my previous score lowered by ten points.

Still quite respectable, still recommended to Amateur lovers who haven't visited the site before but I have tired of it and it will be my last visit.

Visit Girls Out West - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: exotics4me's Review

Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:01:42 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-20-08 09:01am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To exotics4me (365):

exotics4me wrote:

"Thanks, I had a similar review for the Abby Winters site last year. They're both really good sites, and I would hope that my review shows others that like glam porn, that they might not like this one, just like I would hope your review shows those that don't like glam porn, that is the site for them."

messmer's reply:

Yep, that's why I believe a very short review of any site is next to useless. Because every user's taste is so different, (I love hair and have just resubscribed to ATK Natural and Hairy) it is important to give as many details as possible about the contents of a given site.

Quality is very important but the contents are even more so because you might find yourself stuck with a site for a month (or three) that you find terribly boring. Happened to me a few times, Twisty's and ATK Galleria being two recent examples. They are quality sites, most people love them but they couldn't have been farther from what I was looking for. :-) So thanks again for making it so clear to folks about what to expect. Hope new reviewers will read and follow your lead.

View Thread (3)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:04:03 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-19-08 09:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (365)

To messmer (57):

Hey messmer,

Thanks, I had a similar review for the Abby Winters site last year. They're both really good sites, and I would hope that my review shows others that like glam porn, that they might not like this one, just like I would hope your review shows those that don't like glam porn, that is the site for them.

I will tell you a few of the girls I really liked on this site. I thought Pam, reddish/blonde hair was really cute, nice body too. Luna has a great body. Loved Lili and her red hair and freckles. Bridgette reminds me of Erica Campbell and my two favorites were Fluer and Lola. Those girls really caught my attention, especially Lola.

The thing that bothered me though, as much as I dislike lots of pubic hair, if the girl is pretty enough, I can deal with it, but hairy armpits are something that I've never been around, ever. That almost goes into too shocking for me. And several of the g/g sets had girls with hairy armpits.

Not that I think there is anything wrong with it, but it just doesn't fit my ideal of a fantasy woman. I will check that one out that you mentioned, made a notepad note here.

I remember talking to Snowdude last year about the areas we were raised in, and I was raised just outside of Los Angeles, beaches, blondes, bikinis everywhere I looked. So, I do like "regular" girls as well, as a contrast to my raising. One of my strongest fetishes is a woman in a long skirt with a tight sweater on, since I never saw women like that growing up. So, I can appreciate this site for the niche it is and as mentioned in the review, I really do applaud them for sticking to it.

Thanks for the tip on the Rachelle and Page videos and the reply. Will let you know how I liked them.

View Thread (3)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:56:09 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

07-19-08 03:56pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To exotics4me (365):

A fair and detailed review, exotics4me, even though I gave the site a much higher rating. But that's where individual tastes come in and that's why I appreciate reviewers like you. You give all the pertinent details and will steer those who share your taste in a direction more suitable for them without knocking a site that's not quite your cup of tea. BTW, not sure if you will feel the same way I do, given our differences but while you are there download the g/g video (three parts) of Page and Rachelle (could be listed under Rachelle and Page). Rachelle's orgasm is the most realistic I have ever seen in all my porn travels. She's awkward, inexperienced with women, and so genuine and appealing that I marked the three segments: do not delete! :-)

View Thread (3)

RE: messmer's Review

Fri, 09 May 2008 06:55:57 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-09-08 06:55am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To WeeWillyWinky (82):

Thanks, www. I think one of the sites selling points for me is that it is so different from the others. A raunchier Abby Winters as I wrote in my comment way back.

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 17:55:03 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-08-08 05:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (82)

To messmer (57):

Good review. I might check it out in the future.

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 12:13:38 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-08-08 12:13pm

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (9)

To messmer (57):

Currently A memember of AbbyWinters, I did the special they where offering

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 11:31:21 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-08-08 11:31am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To williamj (9):

You're welcome. Hope my taste won't let down your taste. :-)

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 09:43:08 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-08-08 09:43am

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (9)

To messmer (57):

Its on the radar for later this summer. Thanks for the great review.

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 09:01:38 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-08-08 09:01am

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To messmer (57):

"A Studied Casualness", good term - yeah, that might not be up my alley, but I'll have to check it out none-the-less. I'm certainly quite used to casual style in videos, I'm just usually less of a fan in photos. I guess, I won't know for certain until I browse the site for a while. Thanks for all the info :-)

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 08:07:35 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-08-08 08:07am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To Toadsith (48):

You are making many good points, toadsith and I agree with most of what you say. When it comes to GOW I'm convinced that it's no accident that a video will show the videographer hand the model a bottle of body lotion while she's doing a slow strip, or to see her knees and feet as she is laying down for a shot from a floor angle. Is it laziness, I just can't be bothered to edit out these scenes or is it by design? As I said, I think it's by design (a continuing theme) that's why I keep referring to the site as "raw" for lack of a better word. A studied casualness?

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Wed, 07 May 2008 19:08:53 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-07-08 07:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To messmer (57):

Thanks for the clarification - it validates my estimation of the content from their preview pages. I thoroughly understand how you've tired of the "perfect" model look, it can get boring. Years ago I was a member of both MET Art and Hegre Art (back when it was called the Hegre Archives) with year long subscriptions to each. By the time the year was up, just about the last thing I wanted was to look at another glamour girl posing in a window. So I joined a few ATK sites, and that was a nice departure from the glamour model look.

As for the technical aspects of the photography - I guess I'm a bit of stickler about that. A number of people like the poor photography that sometimes shows up on Suicide Girls (which I've been a member of off and on for years) - it always drives me nuts. It isn't just a matter of the photos being crisp and throughly in focus - modern autofocus is so superb that the camera will handle that just fine as long as there is even remotely enough light. An old Sony I had actually projected a laser matrix in front of it and would autofocus in nearly pitch black.

Even with "grit" porn, I expect a certain artistic focus. So you want to do aggressively unorthodox photos and put the photographer's feet in the photo? Fine - but make that style a continuing theme throughout the site. In the preview photos I see photos that could use much color balancing, plus others with washed out colors, flash shadows and so on. Many of the photos look like they want to be smoother, they just aren't.

If you want it to be gritty - photograph it at high ISOs. Throw various objects in the extreme foreground that we have to look past. Give us bizarre angles, like overhead or underneath shots. Photograph using just the on camera flash - or light the scene with a TV. There are tons of fun ways to look amateur while being professional - I just get frustrated by content that looks professional with some amateur seeping through.

Frankly, early Hegre Art stuff had a lot of that problem, he has come a long way over the years. I don't know how young Girls Out West is - maybe they too will improve with time, or maybe they know what they are doing and it just won't ever be quite to my taste. I'll join at some point in the future and try it out, a number of the models do look rather interesting.

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Wed, 07 May 2008 18:33:10 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-07-08 06:33pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To Toadsith (48):

I believe that the technical skill is there and is being used, toadsith. The difference is that they make no attempt to create art. It's a "raw" site and to someone like me who is tired of very beautiful models shot in very tasteful poses it is a breath of fresh air. The photography is crisp and clear, so technically there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. Esthetically maybe (feet of photographer showing etc.) but I'm tired of aesthetics. That's exactly why I wrote what I wrote. Perfection turns me off these days, I see too much of it in another very highly rated site that I subscribe to and which I have visited about three times since the beginning of last week in order to check their updates ... without finding anything to download. All those gorgeous teenies in all their blandness. I wish that, in their case, I had stuck to my usual "subscribe for a month routine" because I have two more months of Barbies left. But, to use the old cliche: chacun a son gout! That's why I hope I made it crystal clear in my review what the site is all about. I wouldn't want to mislead anyone into subscribing to a site that goes totally against their taste. Just to stress it again: the models are mostly ordinary next door type girls/women (I hope I won't insult them with that remark) but that is exactly their attraction for me. Keep in mind that this review is coming from the pen of a guy who wouldn't know a Jenna Jamieson if he tripped over her and judge accordingly. :-)

View Thread (14)

RE: messmer's Review

Wed, 07 May 2008 15:15:54 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-07-08 03:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To messmer (57):

Looks like an interesting site, I may have to check it out sometime in the future. Though it appears to have the same basic downfall of the amateur style that Abby Winters has, many cute models but very, very few beautiful models. At least as far as the photos they put in their tour.

The photography also appears to be sub par in technical skill when compared to Simon Scans or Abby Winters (in my opinion the big two in this genre) and your description seems to confirm this. (Am I right about that?) Still, photo shoots with less of an agenda can sometimes capture some very interesting moments. Plus, the site does seem to have a huge variety of models - more varied than either of the aforementioned sites - so that is appealing.

View Thread (14)

Girls Out West Comment

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:02:09 PST

Girls Out West (5)

01-15-08 12:02pm

COMMENT by messmer (57)

Excellent Site!

A comment rather than a review because, looking back at my previous efforts, I find that in my initial rush of excitement at having found something unusual I tend to give sites a higher rating than they deserve .. in my subjective opinion, of course.

My first impression of GOW is WOW: Abby Winters with spice! I couldn't find glamor and I love that! The models are of the next door, amateur variety and if some aren't as pretty as many might prefer they are fine with me because of their very ordinariness.

When it comes to posing there's no coyness on the part of the model nor attempt by the photographer to create "artistic" nudes. The poses and talk are often raunchy. It is an anti-pornography site (according to Annie, the webmaster/mistress) because it shuns the artificial glamor (glistening, tanned bodies, fake overblown breasts etc.) of most porn sites. I know that when it comes to a preference to see natural girls presented in a natural setting I'm with her all the way and wish her lots of success. I know it is the first time that I am actually tempted to commit myself long term to any site. The next week or two will tell!

BTW, one extra bonus for me: the picture sets are huge and for once many pics have been taken in a "landscape" format which I prefer. This allows me to weed out the "portraits" and still end up with a continuous set taking the model from fully clothed to completely naked. But, as stated, that's MY bonus, you may not care.

Visit Girls Out West - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: jake07621's Review

Thu, 24 May 2007 04:07:27 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-24-07 04:07am

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To supermikey9 (0):

FYI ...

The TBP Editor has now added the site so after you've checked it out, you can write a review at: http://www.pornusers.com/review/naughtybody/

View Thread (5)

RE: jake07621's Review

Wed, 23 May 2007 22:09:29 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-23-07 10:09pm

REVIEW REPLY by supermikey9 (0)

To Khan (Staff):

hey thks for the input guys... I'm gonna join... looks like they put up some new pics of gals ... i let u guys know

supermikey9

View Thread (5)

RE: jake07621's Review

Tue, 22 May 2007 11:38:51 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-22-07 11:38am

REVIEW REPLY by jake07621 (41)

To supermikey9 (0):

I'm not familiar with that site. Sorry.

View Thread (5)

RE: jake07621's Review

Tue, 22 May 2007 05:41:50 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-22-07 05:41am

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To supermikey9 (0):

I have asked the TBP editors to take a look at naughtybody.us If it qualifies, they'll get it listed w/in the next few days but no telling how long it'll take for an express review.

View Thread (5)

RE: jake07621's Review

Tue, 22 May 2007 04:42:54 PDT

Girls Out West (5)

05-22-07 04:42am

REVIEW REPLY by supermikey9 (0)

To jake07621 (41):

hello,

I was surfing and came across a site i was thinking of joining .. Can u tell me any information on it ?? naughtybody.us

m

View Thread (5)