PU - Tushy Lickers - New Reviews

Tushy Lickers Review

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:08:37 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

08-19-09 07:08pm

REVIEW = 75 by doomsday (4)

Pros:
- seemingly recent and regular updates
- re-encoded videos at higher quality than before
- exclusive content in a niche site
- decent back catalog

Cons:
- can be formulaic
- updates are still average-quality SD video files (640 x 480)
- models are b-team, average looking, not young
- not as extreme as expected

Bottom Line:
although the site delivers on content as advertised, the licking here is more for-show quality than you see in recent DVD releases. It's "tushy licking" moreso than "tongue-in-ass" so keep that in mind.

the site is updating*, the models are attractive enough, and the quality of the videos, while not HD quality, is decent. the camera gets tight up in there close enough that you can see what's happening, most of the time. but amateur girls, poor lighting and SD video capture do not make for the best content out there.

.wmv videos are 60-100MB in file size, not very large or long by todays standards and suffer from some compression artifacts. videos are 640 x 480, Standard Def, encoded with Windows Media Video 8 @ ~2000 kbps. audio is ~256 kbps.

*i suspect the updates to be 50/50 new footage and recycled re-encoded (exclusive) stuff.

Visit Tushy Lickers - View Replies - Add Reply

Tushy Lickers Review

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:57:42 PST

Tushy Lickers (0)

02-15-08 02:57pm

REVIEW = 80 by drifter (3)

Pros:
The site does exactly what it promises to do - it delivers great ass licking action!
There is definitely allot of content to download here.
The movies are approx 9-10 min long and start out with the girls discussing ass licking for a minute or so and then they get right to it.
The movies are DRM free - yay!
You can download the movies in either one of four parts or as an entire WMV of MPG file.
The girls are very hot and some scenes have big names like Jenna Haze, Charlie Lane, Tory Lane, Sammie Rhodes and so on.
There is a variety in the scenarios of scenes, ranging from beds to couches mostly with the occasional outdoor scene.

Cons:
The VIDEO QUALITY IS POOR. It is hard enough to shoot great salad tossing action as it is, but the website is not helping any by using below acceptable video quality.
There is almost no consistency with the action in the movies. Some girls do a mind blowing job and really attack that ass, where as some other girls seem to be afraid of going near the other end!
I have wondered if there was even a director present at the shoot!
The scenes are only 9-10 minutes long and the variety of camera angles is poor.
Updates are only once a week for pictures and videos - for the same movie.

Bottom Line:
For people that absolutely love watching women pucker up each others assholes, this site is a true godsend as it fits the niche perfectly.
It is a great site for the niche and thats about it.
They do not provide network access to their other tushy sites.
Unless they drastically improve the video quality, I can safely say that this analingus lover will never ever come back.
If they do, I'll be a member for life.

Visit Tushy Lickers - View Replies - Add Reply

Tushy Lickers Review

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:09:15 PST

Tushy Lickers (0)

01-20-08 10:09am

REVIEW = 78 by Davit (46)

Pros:
-95% of videos are about girls licking each other's assholes. So it does what it says on the tin.
-Lots of content - I downloaded 140 movies in a month
-Movies are well produced, well shot, well filmed, well lit (in the main)
-Most of the girls are very hot and very sexy

Cons:
-Movies are generally very short - around 8 minutes on average I would guess.
-Movie quality is very low by today's standards. They're still watchable - but are probably half the quality of, say, 21 Sextury movies (which are not very hi res in the first place).
-Generally, movies come in pairs; in the first movie girl 'A' will pleasure girl 'B', then in the next movie visa versa. It would be more natural to have a single longer movie for each coupling (or threeway) where they pleasure each other within the same movie.
-Navigation and design is very basic and uninspired

Bottom Line:
Bottom line - now there's an apt phrase for a review of this site. I can honestly say for all it's faults, I have never regretted shelling out the month's fee to access this site's movie booty (oops, there goes another pun).

I'm a self-confessed lover of lesbian anilingus. I just adore it. So it was inevitable that I would find this site alluring. Yes, Tushy Lickers would be so much better if it had better movie quality, zipped pic sets, and classier navigation. It has none of these.

But what it does offer, is a single-minded dedication to the lesbian analingus niche that no other site yet does (as far as I'm aware). It does stray occasionally into B/G scenarios (maybe 5% of movies), which may please some viewers (although I honestly cannot understand how, unless the viewer is bisexual).

Underneath the lo-res presentation of the movies can still clearly be seen high quality original productions, that would be perfectly at home on any lesbian DVD. Yes, I emphasise, the production quality is let down only at the very last stage of file conversion. If these were to be remastered, they could be lesbian classics.

'Ifs' and 'butts'
If lesbianism - or analingus - is not your bag, then the 'cons' will make this site not worth your time or money. But if this kind of action is paradise to you, then this site will give you a small taste of heaven.

Visit Tushy Lickers - View Replies - Add Reply

Tushy Lickers Review

Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:27:37 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

10-02-07 01:27pm

REVIEW = 85 by Getreal (7)

Pros:
lots of content
exclusive content
quality pics and video
weekly updates
mostly lesbian
stays with the fetish no other content. This is a pro if you love ass licking

Cons:
stays with the fetish no other content.
mostly lesbian
this could be a con if you get tired of lesbian ass licking.

Bottom Line:
great site, if you are into the lesbian ass licking fetish.

Visit Tushy Lickers - View Replies - Add Reply