PU - Tushy Lickers - All Activity

RE: Oh No, DRM!!

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:02:49 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

09-24-09 12:02pm

COMMENT REPLY by Colm4 (10)

To StevieG (0):

Damn that's bad. I used to be a member and was planning to continue soon. Guess I have to wait til they come back to their senses.
Thanks for the info.

View Thread (4)

RE: Oh No, DRM!!

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:53:34 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

09-21-09 07:53am

COMMENT REPLY by StevieG (0)

To Colm4 (10):

'fraid so mate. The pattern up till the last 6 updates was to supply the movie in 4 parts, or a single wmv (sometimes drm'd, sometimes not) and mpg (not drm'd). The last 6 updates only give options to stream or download a drm'd wmv.

View Thread (4)

RE: Oh No, DRM!!

Sun, 20 Sep 2009 04:54:17 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

09-20-09 04:54am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Colm4 (10):

If it helps ...

Our editors found the WMV files were using DRM while the MPEG do not *appear* to using it.

View Thread (4)

RE: Oh No, DRM!!

Sun, 20 Sep 2009 04:27:53 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

09-20-09 04:27am

COMMENT REPLY by Colm4 (10)

To StevieG (0):

Are you really sure? It says nothing on the site about it. Isn't that DRM statement on this site just an outdated one?

View Thread (4)

Tushy Lickers Comment

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:04:36 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

09-18-09 08:04am

COMMENT by StevieG (0)

Oh No, DRM!!

Sad to see that Tushy Lickers has gone to DRM. Unless you haven't already been through their excellent back catalogue I'd advise staying away. Updates were always slow (1 movie a week) but the last 5 or 6 have all been DRM & there has been no update at all for the past week or so

Visit Tushy Lickers - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Davit's Review

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:34:29 PST

Tushy Lickers (0)

01-21-08 02:34pm

REVIEW REPLY by Davit (46)

To Robare (6):

Most welcome indeed. Maybe you'll join and give your own review. You may find other aspects worthy of comment that I didn't, or just offer an alternative viewpoint (which is what user reviews are all about).
Regards.

View Thread (4)

RE: Davit's Review

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:42:42 PST

Tushy Lickers (0)

01-20-08 12:42pm

REVIEW REPLY by Robare (6)

To Davit (46):

Thank-you, sir, for your responses, time, and consideration.

View Thread (4)

RE: Davit's Review

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:19:49 PST

Tushy Lickers (0)

01-20-08 12:19pm

REVIEW REPLY by Davit (46)

To Robare (6):

Hi Robare

OK, I'll try and answer your questions mate.

Firstly, yeah, *generally speaking* the updates come in pairs of updates for couples (each the reverse role of the other in terms of recipient) or if it's a threeway then there tends to be 3 updates, where each girl has her turn at being the recipient of the other two. They tend to be not very long - although there are some that go up as long as 11 minutes, but these are in the minority. The shortest one I have is 2mins 11 secs, again in the minority. I'll amend my average to maybe 8 minutes (but that's a best guess - don't expect me to go through my entire collection and work out the exact average, please, I don't want to get pedantic).

Bitrate seems to be mainly 521kbps/320x240. There are also a handful (on my hard drive at least) that are twice this (1060kbps/640x480). This surprised me when I checked this just now, so I played a couple to get a fresh idea of how they look, compared to the many other vids I have. And, very importantly, they *look* much lower res than the stats would suggest. One possible reason is that they've come from a lo-res source - or possibly that the conversion software is substandard. This, of course, is pure conjecture, I can only speak objectively about how they physically look when played. And they do look quite low res and grainy - although, as I said in my review - still watchable.

Your final question about orgasms - in all honesty, I'm not convinced that most of the orgasms portrayed here are genuine. As with most sites, there's little or no evidence of real white 'girl goo' to be seen (the only definitive proof of female orgasm really). But at the same time, the girls don't 'overact' and do seem to be really having a great time together, and most of the climaxes - whether real or not - are the result of anal stimulation principally, and sometimes, but not always, aided by vaginal stimulation simultaneously. The emphasis is definitely on tongue to ass. And the camera is good at getting that shot - after all, it's the whole point of the site.

Hope this helps, but if you have any more questions, or if I have been unclear, please ask away!
Regards
Davit

View Thread (4)

RE: Davit's Review

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:14:04 PST

Tushy Lickers (0)

01-20-08 11:14am

REVIEW REPLY by Robare (6)

To Davit (46):

So, are you able to give us the resolution and bitrate figures? If they're MPG or WMV, then that information may be available in Windows Media Player.
Also, from looking at the site's promotional pages, there appear to be, at present, 172 video and photo sets available and they appear to have been updating once a week for at least a year. There are no sample videos or photos (beyond what "right-click, save image as" provides) available. And, I got the impression from reading your review that there were usually two files per update, one where model A is a recipient and one where model B is a recipient, and that each of these files is 6-7 minutes in duration. Can you confirm?
And, of the movies you've seen, are these models actually having orgasms and by anal stimulation alone?

View Thread (4)

RE: Getreal's Review

Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:10:59 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

10-03-07 12:10am

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (9)

To Getreal (7):

I was a member of one of their sister sites. I found the videos to be too short and just when it looked like things where going to get really interesting the scene ended. No Zip files where a disappointment. If the site was grouped with several others for the same asking price it would be worth the monthly asking price. I would rate the site more like a 70.

View Thread (1)