<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Vintage Classic Porn - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/vintageclassicporn/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_59408</guid>
		<title>Vintage Classic Porn Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=59408</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/vintageclassicporn/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/vintageclassicporn.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Vintage Classic Porn&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/vintageclassicporn/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vintage Classic Porn&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-11-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:47pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=505&quot;&gt;pat362&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=505&quot;&gt;235&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Nearly 500 videos and 520 phototsets.&lt;br /&gt;
-Some pretty hard to find porn.&lt;br /&gt;
-You can search by decade or niches.&lt;br /&gt;
-Movies can be streamed directly online.&lt;br /&gt;
-You can download each movie in low, medium or Hi-resolution.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-You can download the videos in 3 possible resolutions but since the original material for  each video is often awful then that makes the resolution unimportant.&lt;br /&gt;
-They offer a description of content in each video but they have omited the names except maybe for a Betty Page's name.&lt;br /&gt;
-Pics are for the most part tiny and quality is pretty bad on most of them.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-I can't think of any reason you would want to join this site except if you are a rabid porn collector who has to have anything associated with the word porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The majority of the content is what I'd call stag porn from the pics to the videos.  I guess it's nice to know that a site is keeping these historical documents alive but I can't see anyone willing to pay 25$ to get access to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I picked a bordeline score because there is still a lot of content to be found inside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-In case anyone is wondering.  I got access to this site through a special offer.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18879&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Vintage Classic Porn&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=59408&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=59408&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:47:28 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
