PU - Vintage Classic Porn - All Activity

RE: pat362's Review

Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:06:49 PDT

Vintage Classic Porn (1)

04-17-11 11:06am

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To dracken (213):

No all their videos are pretty awful looking but the source material was not the greatest to begin with so that's to be expected.

View Thread (4)

RE: pat362's Review

Sun, 17 Apr 2011 09:25:21 PDT

Vintage Classic Porn (1)

04-17-11 09:25am

REVIEW REPLY by dracken (213)

To pat362 (233):

Good review. I am interested in old timey porn and was glad to find this review.

I am just curious how are their videos from more recent years? Are they better quality? Also do they have some old playboy photos or did not get that license?

Thanks for your opinions :)

View Thread (4)

RE: pat362's Review

Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:08:20 PDT

Vintage Classic Porn (1)

04-13-11 07:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To Capn (27):

I understand what you mean. The first porn film I saw was probably an 8mm or 16mm stag film. The print was crappy and there was no sound but it was still penetration porn. Then of course the first nude magazines I saw where old Playboys from the 60's. In many ways this is what this site reminds me most. Like I said it's a nice reposotory of historical cinema and print images but I don't think people want to pay 25$ for that kind of content.

View Thread (4)

RE: pat362's Review

Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:49:46 PDT

Vintage Classic Porn (1)

04-13-11 02:49pm

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To pat362 (233):

I have to say the idea of these vintage / retro porn sites does appeal to me.
Unfortunately, I have yet to find one up to scratch.

Cap'n. :0(

View Thread (4)