Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/karliemontana/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_34953 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=34926#34953 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/karliemontana/"> <img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/karliemontana.jpg" alt="Enter Karlie Montana" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/karliemontana/"><b>Karlie Montana</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 05-12-09 11:26am </td> <td> <b>REVIEW REPLY</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=4073">atrapat</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=4073">110</a>)<br> <br> To <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=940">Drooler</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=940">218</a>):<br /><br /> As I said, I got the feeling not much care was put into this site's design. Regardless, if <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/karliemontana/">Karlie Montana</a> made regular use of the features at hand, fans of hers would get their money's worth. <br /> <br /> For instance, that exact content engine is used at Jessica Drake but jessica drake seems to be working on her site several times a day (blogs, travel pictures, comments, <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/wickedpictures/">Wicked Pictures</a> movie stills or whatever). The site is as ugly, cumbersome and download-unfriendly as this one but her fans have good reasons to check in on a daily basis.<br /> <br /> In any case, I'd still recommend the trial to <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/karliemontana/">Karlie Montana</a> to anyone who's had a thing for the model at some point; I feel her &quot;nutty&quot; personality is one of her main appeals and it shows a lot here. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=34926#34953"><b>View Thread</b></a> (2)</td> </tr> </table> <br> <br> Tue, 12 May 2009 11:26:43 PDT pornusers_34929 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=34926#34929 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/karliemontana/"> <img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/karliemontana.jpg" alt="Enter Karlie Montana" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/karliemontana/"><b>Karlie Montana</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 05-11-09 04:01pm </td> <td> <b>REVIEW REPLY</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=940">Drooler</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=940">218</a>)<br> <br> To <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=4073">atrapat</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=4073">110</a>):<br /><br /> This was a helpful review, as Karlie has been a favorite of mine even since I first saw her at Matts (overly dark photos). I won't join this site, though, 'cause it sounds like just another slapdash attempt to turn a buck. <br /> <br /> The watermarks alone would keep me away. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=34926#34929"><b>View Thread</b></a> (2)</td> </tr> </table> <br> <br> Mon, 11 May 2009 16:01:52 PDT