<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Porn Fidelity - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornfidelity/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_24191</guid>
		<title>Porn Fidelity Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24191</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornfidelity/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pornfidelity.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Porn Fidelity&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornfidelity/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Porn Fidelity&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-06-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:56am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 84&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;234&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Good collection (245+ videos / photosets).&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is quite easy.&lt;br /&gt;
- No download limit.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos and photosets quality is very good.&lt;br /&gt;
- Consistent updates (weekly).&lt;br /&gt;
- Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Trial option available.&lt;br /&gt;
- Good looking models.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No ZIP download option for photosets.&lt;br /&gt;
- More download options for videos would be cool.&lt;br /&gt;
- Expensive monthly subscription price.&lt;br /&gt;
- Old content's quality needs improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
- No bonus content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Website design could be better.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornfidelity/&quot;&gt;PornFidelity&lt;/a&gt; is a good adult website that needs improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, members have access to 245+ videos and photosets. ZIP download option for photosets in missing so you will have to download them one by one. Videos can be downloaded in three formats (.wmv, .mov and .mp4 / .m4v) in parts or as full length movies. At this point, I have to say that some scenes can only be downloaded in parts (old content). More download options would be cool at my opinion. Quality is very good though old content's quality needs improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
Website design could be better, at my opinion, but navigation is quite easy, so I don't think that you will have a problem with that. There is no DRM videos protection or download limit plus downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
Monthly subscription price is high but there is a trial option available. Moreover, some bonus content / extras would be good.&lt;br /&gt;
Content is exclusive and site updates weekly. Website's models (in general) look very good.&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, I think that if you are into such content then you should definitely try this one.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1854&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Porn Fidelity&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24191&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=24191&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:56:43 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16562</guid>
		<title>Porn Fidelity Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16562</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornfidelity/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pornfidelity.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Porn Fidelity&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornfidelity/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Porn Fidelity&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-23-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:59am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 86&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;301&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- More from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/kellymadison/&quot;&gt;Kelly Madison&lt;/a&gt;, more of a hardcore site, with higher quality&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos are 640 high end, but unlike Kelly's solo site, this one has 1500+ bitrate, much better&lt;br /&gt;
- Download speeds are also better on this site, about 25% above average for me&lt;br /&gt;
- Sex is very believable, and there are some really great models that join the husband/wife threesomes, Sienna being my favorite&lt;br /&gt;
- Pictures of each video, but see cons&lt;br /&gt;
- Some sets don't have Kelly in them, which can be a good thing just to break up the repetitiveness.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- They boosted bitrate on the videos, but no zip downloads on the pictures. Go figure. &lt;br /&gt;
- Still is repetitive, similar content to Kelly's solo site&lt;br /&gt;
- $29.95 is too much for what equals just a video site&lt;br /&gt;
- The biggest part of the models on this site are just like Kelly in build, just like on her solo site, big boobs, small waist and butt&lt;br /&gt;
- After a month of this and Kelly's solo site you really become very bored with the whole wife/husband having threesomes niche
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site for me is the best of the 413 Productions sites. I do think they should package the three together for $30. This site is almost identical to Kelly's solo site except the videos have a better bitrate. It is still the same storyline, husband and wife looking for a younger women to join them in a threesome. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few clips that do not have Kelly or her husband in them, and that is probably a saving grace, since it does break up the repetitive nature, same couple, same storyline that Kelly's solo site has. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned in the cons, still no hi-resolution pictures and this time, they don't even offer zip downloads. High bitrates, high resolution pictures, downloadable zips for pictures is a $30 site. This really isn't, and I would recommend the trial over a full month membership because of that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kelly and her husband are both very good performers, both seem to enjoy the sex and with the added hotter models on this one, they get a higher score here than on Kelly's solo site. The model Sienna is really sexy in an exotic way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Download speeds are plenty good enough, the navigation is very simple, point, click, go. Some known pornstars here as well. Which isn't a bad thing, but it reminds you that Kelly isn't really an amateur, which does take away from the storyline of husband/wife looking to have as many threesomes as possible, just because they love sex. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recommend it for a month only. The content is what it says it is, and they do it well.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1854&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Porn Fidelity&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16562&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=16562&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:59:49 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3552</guid>
		<title>Porn Fidelity Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3552</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornfidelity/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pornfidelity.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Porn Fidelity&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornfidelity/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Porn Fidelity&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-05-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:42am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1376&quot;&gt;titlover&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1376&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Top notch production, storylines, vid quality, site design. And of course &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/kellymadison/&quot;&gt;Kelly Madison&lt;/a&gt; and her big titties. And each update they bring in different girls to fuck. Excellent!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The strength of the site is Kelly and Ryan. But that is also the weakness. The site should be called &amp;quot;Ryan Madison Gets Some Pussy&amp;quot;   &lt;br /&gt;
Apparently Ryan gets to fuck everybody...yet Kelly isn't allowed to have sex with any other men. That hurts the site in my opinion. It would be a lot better if every other episode featured Kelly getting fucked by different guys. But I guess it's a GREAT deal for Ryan! LOL!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Big titties, three way sex....I love it!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1854&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Porn Fidelity&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3552&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3552&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 11:42:46 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>