<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Back Room Casting Couch - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/backroomcastingcouch/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_55749</guid>
		<title>Back Room Casting Couch Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=55749</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/backroomcastingcouch/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/backroomcastingcouch.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Back Room Casting Couch&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/backroomcastingcouch/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Back Room Casting Couch&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-11-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:09pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=505&quot;&gt;pat362&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=505&quot;&gt;235&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-They have a nice mix of female body types.&lt;br /&gt;
-Many of the girls are amateurs or new to the porn biz.&lt;br /&gt;
-Nearly 150 videos.&lt;br /&gt;
-Videos appear to all be wmv.&lt;br /&gt;
-You can use a download manager.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-No photos of any kind.(screencaps would have been nice).&lt;br /&gt;
-Only one page so you have to keep scrollig down to find the next videos.&lt;br /&gt;
-You can only download 4 videos and that's with or without a download manager.&lt;br /&gt;
-All the scenes are POV and he uses a couple of cameras to give you different perspectives but the editing is so bad that some of the shot are of the guy playing with the camera while many of the others ones show bad angles of the action.&lt;br /&gt;
-All the scenes are filmed in the same office the desk or the floor.&lt;br /&gt;
-The guy never stops talking and that's fine in the interview part but you would hope that once the actions starts that he'd shut-up.&lt;br /&gt;
-The guy doesn't want to be identified so you have a pixelated circle whenenever there is a chance that we might see his face.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The site has some good looking girls and most of these have never made it unto my porn radar so I was curious to see them in action.  After having joined this site then I can honestly say, that I'm still curious to see them in action.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm glad that this guy has money to get girls to have sex with him on camera and his choice of girls is very good but I wish he cared enough about his customers to allow us to see them in action.  Get a camera man or get a performer but don't try to be both.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to see some really cute amateurs have sex and don't mind talking during the sex and the less than stellar camera shots then you might enjoy this site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18393&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Back Room Casting Couch&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=55749&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=55749&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:09:38 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_51773</guid>
		<title>Back Room Casting Couch Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=51773</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/backroomcastingcouch/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/backroomcastingcouch.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Back Room Casting Couch&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/backroomcastingcouch/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Back Room Casting Couch&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-16-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:10pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=7834&quot;&gt;dracken&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=7834&quot;&gt;213&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- about 130 videos and a new one every Tuesday evening. Unfortunately the videos are all different sizes, quality and can either be mpg or wmv, some of them only one or the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- some seriously hot girls. Look through the tour to see some very cute girls, and if you look on the porn tubes you can usually find one or two previews to his videos (only the highlights, for the good stuff you have to join)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the scenes seem very unscripted, it's just a dude with a camera and a girl. Which means that sometime he runs around setting stuff up or he chats with the girl while she lubes herself, if you like that kind of real, pierre woodman-like stuff that you'll love this site. If you prefer perfect light, professional zoom-ins and generally more mainstream stuff, this might put you off. On the other hand seeing a girl hold a camera and then seeing how it shakes as she cums (and either they are incredible actors or they really cum) makes this site very unique.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Download speeds can be slow at times. I got anywhere from 50kb to 900, no clue why or how.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Whole site is very amateur-ish, just like the content. There is one video were he even says he accidentally forgot to turn on one camera so we just get one angle. I thought it was funny, but other people might feel cheated out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Some girls only do solo (only one or two, but still a tag system would have been nice) Unfortunately the site has no search and the descriptions are not always very clear. I remember for one girl he says he can't believe she does anal, well she doesn't :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Some girls are not first time on video. Nicole Ray and Chastity are both professional models and I bet a few more of the girls are too, kinda shame really since the amateurs are so much cutter. There is one read head soccer mom who tries anal and her scene is incredibility hot.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- No photos, really a shame.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- No bonus sites. I understand a year or two back the site came in a package, no more
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site has two very big bonuses going for it. Hot amateur girls. Many of the models are truly shy and a bit uncomfortable and it shows, also the guy is not a huge douche like other porn models. I think I mentioned this before but he closely resembles Pierre Woodman, he is there to convince these girls to have sex on camera, but he won't abuse them more than they want to be abused and that makes the whole video a lot more enjoyable. Going back to that hot read-head soccer mom I mentioned before, she tries anal and is clearly uncomfortable and he immediately stops the scene instead of pushing it. The whole moment along with the look on her face lets you know this is real, unscripted sex, but with much better camera work than a truly amateur scene.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh and there is also the twitter, which the guy uses to posts future interviews and ask for feedback, very nice usage of the web 2.0 media. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, here is where the good things stop and I have to mention the very plain site design, the lack of bonus features, the lack of a decent search button and the fact that we don't get photo-sets. For the same price I pay here I can get a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nubiles/&quot;&gt;Nubiles&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/littlemutt/&quot;&gt;Little Mutt&lt;/a&gt; subscription and get three times the content. It's true those sites don't have the interviews and the whole &quot;real&quot; setting, but then again you can join woodmanX and get similar content and a lot more of it (then again woodman is more expensive and not all scenes are in English). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, the bottom line? I love the site, but I can see how many people wouldn't feel the same way. It lacks in features and if you don't LOVE the pov, interview, reality kinda videos these will leave you feeling a bit cheated. I for one will download a bunch of the videos and probably join back in a year or so for the updates, in the mean time I am following the twitter feed and will enjoy that incredibly hot read-head (did I mention here already ? I feel like I did :).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18393&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Back Room Casting Couch&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=51773&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=51773&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:10:21 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_51109</guid>
		<title>Back Room Casting Couch Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=51109</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/backroomcastingcouch/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/backroomcastingcouch.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Back Room Casting Couch&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/backroomcastingcouch/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Back Room Casting Couch&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-27-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:49pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 81&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6571&quot;&gt;slutty&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6571&quot;&gt;92&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Some attractive ladies&lt;br /&gt;
-No DRM&lt;br /&gt;
-Reasonable sized collection, 128 scenes at the time of review&lt;br /&gt;
-Interesting concept, most of the talent plays around pretty well&lt;br /&gt;
-Newer stuff is good video quality, 620x360 WMV with 4500 kbps total bitrate&lt;br /&gt;
-Download speeds are good if you use a download manager, not so great through browser (300 KB/sec browser, 900 KB/sec with manager) &lt;br /&gt;
-Bills through CCBill, didn't have any experience with customer service&lt;br /&gt;
-Exclusive content, including some ladies I hadn't seen before anywhere
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-No real navigation to speak of, just a list of the sets.  However, pretty much every model only appears once.&lt;br /&gt;
-Site is very very bland, nothing really there except the long list of scenes (unsortable) and a link to friends' sites.&lt;br /&gt;
-No photosets at all&lt;br /&gt;
-Camerawork can be iffy, since it is mostly filmed with the combination of POV and a tripod, the angles aren't always good - and the guy sometimes gets up to move the camera around (they don't edit this part out)&lt;br /&gt;
-Sort of expensive given the amount of content&lt;br /&gt;
-Not all download managers work (DTA did, GetRight didn't)&lt;br /&gt;
-No bonus content&lt;br /&gt;
-The video quality of the older sets is pretty poor - worst I saw was 480x360 1800 kbps.&lt;br /&gt;
-Infrequent updates, only one per week&lt;br /&gt;
-Oddly the guy blurs out his face with a big blurry Japanese mosaic kind of thing, which can be a bit distracting.&lt;br /&gt;
-Model attractiveness is variable, and there are LOTS of tattoos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					For what this site is I think it is pretty decent.  Its main drawbacks are the older content's quality, the price, and the size of the site.  If they merged this site with their sister site (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/exploitedcollegegirls/&quot;&gt;Exploited College Girls&lt;/a&gt;) for the same price, the site would defintely become more reasonably priced.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site has an interesting concept, and there are even a few scenes where the girls decide to back out, which adds some realism I suppose.  The concept for the most part is that he tells the girls they can make 1k-5k per day doing private videos for his customers that only the customer will ever see - but of course he has to kick the tires on the ladies first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the style of site, I didn't find the dude to be that much of a jackass, compared to similar sites like BangBros - where you want to strangle the dude behind the camera.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you aren't into this kind of setup, you will probably find the site to be lacking, as the camerwork is pretty bad in places, but if you do enjoy this kind of thing it might be worth joining - but just for a month, I don't know why anyone would get their multi-month membership, I don't think you get any bonus sites with that membership either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically a decent site, and he certainly got some attractive ladies - too bad about the tattoos in many cases (what is with that huge fucking teddy bear on Danni Cole's back, shit!).  The ladies are mostly American from what I can tell, and not a lot of ethnic diversity here - almost all white.  I downloaded about 25 scenes that I plan to keep, amongst those there are about 5 that will be added to my favorites (including the Danni Cole scene, and a Rilee Jensen scene that were both pretty good).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are into casting call type scenes, this is definitely a site to consider.  Although it could certainly use some improvements, and perhaps a lower price, I'd say it is worth a one month membership.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18393&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Back Room Casting Couch&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=51109&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=51109&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:49:06 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_34259</guid>
		<title>Back Room Casting Couch Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=34259</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/backroomcastingcouch/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/backroomcastingcouch.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Back Room Casting Couch&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/backroomcastingcouch/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Back Room Casting Couch&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-25-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:14pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6450&quot;&gt;mrpss&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6450&quot;&gt;9&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Most of the models have a very natural &amp;quot;girl next door&amp;quot; look to them&lt;br /&gt;
-The acting is pretty good for a porn site&lt;br /&gt;
-Free access to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/exploitedcollegegirls/&quot;&gt;exploitedcollegegirls.com&lt;/a&gt; if you remain a member for a second month&lt;br /&gt;
-The site sticks with their theme&lt;br /&gt;
-Site navigation is very easy&lt;br /&gt;
-Good download speeds (I got between 700Kb and 800Kb per second without using any sort of download manager or speed accelerator)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-It costs $29.49 per month, but there are currently only 61 scenes posted&lt;br /&gt;
-Video quality is slightly lower than the steller quality vids that most good sites are putting out these days&lt;br /&gt;
-No pictures or vid caps (All videos)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site a lot like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://backroomfacial.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;backroomfacial.com&lt;/a&gt; site that was part of the bangbros network about 6 years ago (Except this site is a little lighter on the degradation aspect).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What really makes this site great in my opinion is that they go the extra mile to sell you the illusion that the girl is just some chick looking into an add she saw and ends up getting tricked into having sex on camera without getting paid for it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First off, most of the models look no different than the average college girl. Also, the acting was sufficient enough for me to buy into the idea that the girl does not know exactly what she is getting herself into when she shows up for the interview. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, sticking with the site's theme, every scene is shot in the same room, with the same guy, and he gives every girl the same spiel about how she can make $1,000 to $5,000 a day doing porn, but she has to prove she can take directions well and perform on the spot before she gets the job. What is NOT the same in every scene is how the girl reacts to this dude's sales pitch. Some girls are eager to prove they are the perfect girl for the job, some reluctantly go through with his demands, and a few even walk out on him.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last, but not least, is the quantity and quality of videos. As stated in the cons, this site only has 61 videos as of today. The wide majority of scenes are between 20 and 40 minutes long and are between 200MB and 300MB in size. The visual quality is not bad, but not the steller quality that most sites are putting out these days. In my opinion, the slightly lower visual quality helps feed into the amateur feel of the scene. However, below are some stats from one of the vids that I downlowded to help you decide for yourself whether the quality is acceptable or not. Also, the quality of the sample vids on the preview page are representative of the quality of the members area vids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audio: Windows Media Audio 44100Hz stereo 96Kbps [Raw Audio 0]&lt;br /&gt;
Video: Windows Media Video 9 576x324 29.97fps 1100Kbps [Raw Video 1]   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line, in my opinion, as far as content goes, this is my favorite site on the net today. The only reason I gave it an 89 is because I just can't justify giving a score of 90 or higher to a site that has a price tag of $29.49 but only provides 61 scenes. However, if they keep up with their weekly updates, and the quality of content stays the same as it is right now, it will be in the high 90's on my scale within a year from now.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18393&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Back Room Casting Couch&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=34259&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=34259&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:14:17 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
