<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Amazing Grannies - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/amazinggrannies/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_55389</guid>
		<title>Amazing Grannies Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=55389</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amazinggrannies/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amazinggrannies.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amazing Grannies&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amazinggrannies/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amazing Grannies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-03-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:43am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 50&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;messmer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;123&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Lots of pictures&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allows search by ethnic groups, sexual activities (Hardcore, Lesbians, Solo), amateur etc.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I won't dignify this site with a long review because I took two looks, downloaded some samples from each site on the &quot;network&quot; and decided never to go back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amazing Grannies offered some potentially nice pictures but they cannot be zipped. None of the models featured on their tour could be found. Most are much younger than &quot;Grannies.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Videos were so so in quality. The bonus sites &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hairypussycuties/&quot;&gt;Hairy Pussy Cuties&lt;/a&gt;,&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/vintagecuties/&quot;&gt;Vintage Cuties&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; &quot;Home Made Junk&quot; were horribly outdated. In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hairypussycuties/&quot;&gt;Hairy Pussy Cuties&lt;/a&gt;, as one example, there is also the effort to deceive the customer: five updates are listed as having been added on November 29, 2010 but those updates all consist of pictures with dimensions 800x600 and lead me to assume that the sets are old and have just been given a new date to make it look as if the site is still active. The site news had its last entry in 2006!! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/vintagecuties/&quot;&gt;Vintage Cuties&lt;/a&gt; is of horrendous quality. I realize these sets are old but there is always Photoshop to bring the best out of vintage pictures.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					All four are utter garbage sites. Amazing Grannies as a stand alone site might get a sixty from me if the picture sets could be zipped but I am not in the mood to download pictures one by one even if the set only contains about 30 pictures. Email to support re. zips only brought deafening silence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, yeah, almost forgot to mention, communication between the various sites is slower than cold molasses. Downloads from every site but Amazing Grannies was around 70 KB/s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Avoid like the plague. This is another case where I wish I could give my subscription away to someone else because, after only two days, I ain't goin' back!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor addition:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One other thing I forgot to mention, they gave me a choice of billers. Both CCBill and Epoch are listed as alternates but no longer do business with this site because I was kicked over to Segpay when I tried to pay through either! That tells the whole story right there!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18334&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amazing Grannies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=55389&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=55389&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:43:36 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_43070</guid>
		<title>Amazing Grannies Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=43070</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amazinggrannies/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amazinggrannies.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amazing Grannies&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amazinggrannies/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amazing Grannies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-06-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:50am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;344&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-A week is free with a monthly membership. You get 37 days for the one month price.&lt;br /&gt;
-Frequent updates. Photo sets are one every 2 days, videos one a week.&lt;br /&gt;
-Photos are zipdownloadable.&lt;br /&gt;
-Good size photo archives. 829 photo sets. The number of photos is not listed, but almost all sets are between 100 and 200. The photos are mostly of professional models and the rest are homemade and user submitted.&lt;br /&gt;
-Some variety of races, ages and body types. Most are Eastern Europeans.&lt;br /&gt;
-Mostly fresh faces. Only a few I recognized as older pornstars.&lt;br /&gt;
-Comes with three bonus sites-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hairypussycuties/&quot;&gt;hairypussycuties.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/homemadejunk/&quot;&gt;homemadejunk.com&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/vintagecuties/&quot;&gt;vintagecuties.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
-Nearly all have hairy bushes. The models are very unglam and appear to be natural without boob jobs or tattoos. Many have noticeable imperfections. For me this is a plus.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Advertises itself as featuring models at least 40. I don't think that some are that old. Most of the better looking models appear to be younger. &lt;br /&gt;
-The videos are not of very good quality. Most are masturbation or b/g, with a few a few lesbian scenes. I considered the videos to be a total waste and deleted them all. Definitely not a site to join for the videos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is billed as a niche site and comes with others that also focus on models with hairy bush. This one focuses on older models within that niche.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The models are mostly in their 40s, with a few that seem a few years younger. The older models are almost all unattractive and overweight. Not much to be found here that promotes sexiness. More to my taste is that the younger models are much better looking. I suspect this is not due to the aging process, but to a much smaller pool of women willing to pose. Most of the older models would not have been hot in their twenties either. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the photosets are very hot, but not enough of them are due to the fact that unfortunately the site seems to focus more on frequent updates than on quality. Many of the photosets feature the same models over and over. Since these are usually the most attractive models, I see this as a plus. In contrast, the photos of the models that are used as previews generally makes you pass by most of the sets. I found at best one in four sets worth checking out. One thing I do appreciate is that the style of the photography is professional, very explict and gets to the point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall worth considering if you find older bush interesting. However, a lot of the content just isn't worth bothering with.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18334&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amazing Grannies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=43070&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=43070&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:50:40 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
