<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>PU - Massage Parlor - New Reviews</title>
        <description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
        <link>https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/</link>
        <copyright>All Rights Reserved © 2003-2026 PornUsers.com.</copyright>
                    <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_114362</guid>
                <title>Massage Parlor Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=114362</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/massageparlor.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Massage Parlor&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Massage Parlor&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-09-21&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:13pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 92&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=24346&quot;&gt;Alybator&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=24346&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A welcome change to the formulaic world of massage porn even if the site is dead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 314 scenes each with a downloadable video.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very little intercourse, but more than a handjob/blowjob. It’s a middle ground of what massage porn usually gives us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simple to use site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very good video quality, considering the site hasn’t updated in years, makes it an easy site to skip, but you shouldn’t.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Includes photo sets with 100+ pictures and those are downloadable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most male and female models are attractive.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I’m going to list the no longer updating as a con, but it’s a large site for what looks like a non-standard niche in the massage genre.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There could be more navigation options and tags.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The most common massage sites appeal to me. I like the use of oils, the massaging, the hand movements and what I see as erotic foreplay. The problem I have found with most massage sites is that the massages are usually just lead-ins for a handjob/blowjob scene or a standard hardcore scene. I believe it’s one of the embedded into, ingrained if you will, failures of porn over the last 5-10 years. That’s why I appreciate this site and hate that it has stopped updating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scenes start off like any massage scene. The masseuse is almost always the female except in a few of the scenes. There are some scenes with more than a masseuse and a customer, working in the angle of “she’s training” to add a second female. The massage doesn’t jump from first touch leads to sex. Some of the scenes have nearly half of the scene focused on the massage. There’s an added playfulness in the scenes with more than one female. As the male customer -- lying face down -- is unaware of the two female masseuses touching each other and taking their clothes off. Where the site excels is only a few of the scenes turn into hardcore sex. Most of the scenes instead of the female masseuse giving the male a handjob or blowjob, shows the masseuse climbing on top of the man in a 69. That is not something I am used to seeing in massage scenes. It, to me, adds a touch of eroticism. If you have problems with fantasizing, I think these scenes help with that. They’re not having noisy sex which usually ruins massage scenes for me. Maybe the 69 is the great mystery solver to stop the overacting and excessive chatter from the models? Both the male and female have their mouths either full or their tongues active. I really like this content and would like to see more of this style of massage porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 315 scenes so all is not lost. Of those 315 scenes, each has a downloadable video and downloadable photo set. All 315 videos have 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads, even the oldest ones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the site’s easy to use navigation, though I will complain that there needs to be better tagging, the site is still one of those that is easy to look over due to it not updating. The attractiveness and decent acting ability of the models make the scenes even more enjoyable. These scenes do work in a little story. It usually happens within the first few minutes of the scenes and has to do with the male customer calling someone, talking about how stressed out they are and how much the massage is needed. It’s not anything too deep, but it is enough. I definitely recommend it for those who want to see a massage scene that is more sexual than a handjob (usually CFNM when in massage), but doesn’t go all the way to hardcore.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18303&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Massage Parlor&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=114362&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=114362&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 15:13:03 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_108396</guid>
                <title>Massage Parlor Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=108396</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/massageparlor.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Massage Parlor&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Massage Parlor&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-03-18&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:51pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- A no longer updating site in the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/fantasymassage/&quot;&gt;Fantasy Massage&lt;/a&gt; network, that I personally think it the best site in the network even without updates. &lt;br /&gt;
- This massage niche was very popular for a few years then kind of dropped off. For me, the best ones didn&amp;#039;t try to be that different from scene to scene and this one excels at that. &lt;br /&gt;
- Surprising overall quality considering it launched in 2008 and stopped updating in 2014, every video has up to 1080p quality downloads. &lt;br /&gt;
- Maybe the most realistic &amp;quot;fantasy&amp;quot; site possible since you would typically be nude or mostly nude. &lt;br /&gt;
- Very good DL speeds (80% and up of my max)&lt;br /&gt;
- Good navigation and despite the fact that it stopped updating in 2014, there&amp;#039;s a fairly large catalog of content here (will go into in BL). &lt;br /&gt;
- One of the few niches that doesn&amp;#039;t require acting ability!&lt;br /&gt;
- Photos with each scene that are screenshots.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- This niche as much as any, has the &amp;quot;it&amp;#039;s going to become repetitive&amp;quot; factor. &lt;br /&gt;
- As mentioned, it no longer updates. &lt;br /&gt;
- The scenes that try to do too much. Will go into in BL.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I reviewed another site from the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/fantasymassage/&quot;&gt;Fantasy Massage&lt;/a&gt; network a few weeks ago and talked about how I thought this niche was very underrated but also poorly produced. A lot of massage scenes these days are just plain hardcore scenes that happen to look like a massage led into the sex. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/&quot;&gt;Massage Parlor&lt;/a&gt; is the typical porn site of 2018. For me, it did way more right than wrong and it&amp;#039;s one of the sites the network stopped updating. There&amp;#039;s a part of me that believes these sites that stop updating, stop updating because they require more money to film, more time to plan, etc...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What stands out here is the vast majority of these scenes start out with the female masseuse talking to the male. The first 4-7 minutes is a believable massage, some of the masseuses start becoming aroused and grind their bodies into the man being massaged, they perform the massages in either robes that drape open or in sexy lingerie. It then progresses to either a handjob or a blowjob, usually further progressing into a 69 and the scenes last right at 20 minutes each. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That&amp;#039;s believable to me. The massage scenes that turn into full sex, loud screaming and moaning, don&amp;#039;t come off as believable. I would hate to think the main reason this site stopped updating was because it doesn&amp;#039;t have much full sex on it but it does seem like that would also be believable. A couple of the other sites in the network also follow a similar beginning as &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/&quot;&gt;Massage Parlor&lt;/a&gt; but go directly into full sex. I see massages as erotic, teasing and if done right, even mysterious. The temptation of going a little further than touching/massage is a realistic progression. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The good part is if you like this content there are 314 scenes on it and as mentioned in the pros, all 314 have up to 1080p downloadable versions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can see where they&amp;#039;ve tried alternate setups. They have some that have a masseuse in training, with the experienced masseuse playing something of a dominating role and forcing the trainee to give the male a blowjob. They have ones that the setting looks more like a hotel room than a massage parlor and a few that turn into multiple guys getting massages and blowjobs from the one masseuse. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mentioned that acting isn&amp;#039;t required in this niche and I believe that. The only thing required of the female masseuse is for her to give erotic rubs of her hand onto the man. This believably turns the masseuses on. Eye movements, eye contact, expressions, even breathing patterns work in that situation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&amp;#039;s similar to my interest in handjob and CFNM porn. I like to see natural reactions from the females more than relying on their acting ability to make me believe they&amp;#039;re enjoying themselves. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of my favorite parts of this site are the models. One in particular, Chloe Amour, seems to love doing this kind of porn. She reminds me of Jessica Alba in some sort of odd way and she has 17 videos on this network. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which is why I&amp;#039;m comfortable saying this style of porn is different than hardcore. Some of the models on here are extremely good at this style but are dull, dime-a-dozen, in regular porn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is one of those rare cases where I rate a site higher than its network. I&amp;#039;ve tried explaining that before and think I&amp;#039;ve figured it out. It&amp;#039;s my way of saying, I would join this site whether it had the network access or not. I do think in this age of networks ruling porn, there are sites on those networks that stand out whether with our personal preferences or favorite niches. I&amp;#039;ve mostly heard negative comments from webmasters that say, &amp;quot;How can you score a site a X but only score the network that the site is IN a Y?&amp;quot; There, I explained it! The network itself is very good overall but I think the content on &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/&quot;&gt;Massage Parlor&lt;/a&gt; shows that the network&amp;#039;s other sites are very formulaic and are trying to meet some kind of criteria. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This network and site also gives me access to Adult Time but I am not figuring Adult Time into this review. This is solely on &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/&quot;&gt;Massage Parlor&lt;/a&gt;. In my opinion, it&amp;#039;s the best of the female gives male a massage niche.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18303&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Massage Parlor&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=108396&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=108396&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 22:51:34 PST</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_75881</guid>
                <title>Massage Parlor Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=75881</link>
                <description></description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 05:33:49 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_35313</guid>
                <title>Massage Parlor Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=35313</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/massageparlor.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Massage Parlor&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/massageparlor/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Massage Parlor&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-22-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:27am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Bill through CCBill&lt;br /&gt;
-56 videos about 20 minutes long. Good amount for a specialized niche site.&lt;br /&gt;
-Updates once a week on Wednesdays.&lt;br /&gt;
-Supports download managers.&lt;br /&gt;
-Can download whole video (1440x1080, 8255kbps)  or lower quality (720x480, 3155 kbps) clips. The whole video option videos are definitely true HD quality. The clips are quite sharp and are higher quality than what you find on most sites.&lt;br /&gt;
-Each video also has zipdwonloadable screenshot photos. 900x600, but extremely sharp.&lt;br /&gt;
-Nice members forum that encourages suggestions.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Too many actors and actresses with tattoos.&lt;br /&gt;
-Can get repetitious.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					My first reaction to this site is that it is one that others should imitate. Each video focuses on what goes on behind closed doors at a massage parlor. There actually is a bit of a story with interaction between the characters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each scene has about seven minutes of acting before the sex part begins in videos that are about 20 minutes long. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the scenes the guys go to a massage parlor that tries hard to pretend that it is totally legit, not one of THOSE massage parlors. The guys talk about their stressful jobs and have the types of massage explained to them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They get to choose from at least two masseuses that are usually wearing sexy bathrobes that leave little to the imagination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Behind closed doors, each scene starts with a real massage, but the guys get a &amp;quot;happy ending&amp;quot; that costs extra. The sex is performed nude and consists of hand jobs/blow jobs. Not every scene is a bj, but most are. There is no vaginal or anal and only one scene has two girls. No lesbian here. Although there is some pussy eating by the guys, the pleasure is deinitely male focused. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The girls are mostly well known, attractive pornstars, but some are relative newcomers. This adds to the feeling of professionalism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall the videos are well done fantasies. My only complaints are that about a third of the girls have excessive tattoos, some guys also have too many tattoos, and the scenes do become repetitive. There is a little variety, as when the two know each other, or one is a city inspector, but more variety would be better.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A huge plus is the beautiful HD quality, with WMV as the only option.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18303&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Massage Parlor&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=35313&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=35313&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 08:27:37 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                </channel>
</rss>