PU - Muse.org - All Activity

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:18:57 PDT

Muse.org (1)

03-19-10 10:18am

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (4)

To lk2fireone (44):

Thanks for the info, think i might give this one a miss for now and maybe sign up at MPL.

View Thread (3)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:15:10 PDT

Muse.org (1)

03-19-10 07:15am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (44)

To tangub (4):

I can't tell you how often the site is currently updating.

My membership ended last week. I had problems trying to enter the site. I kept getting the error message that I was not authorized, even though my membership was still current.

I sent emails, asking for help.
No replies.

I also sent emails asking for my membership to be extended, because the site advertised, for a while, that 1-year memberships (and I paid for a 1-year membership) would be extended due to the site not updating in 2008 and most of 2009.

No replies to my emails.

So I just gave up in frustration.

The site has a number of very attractive models.

But the photosets are very small: about 15-20 photos per set. So even though the model might be attractive, the small number of photos per set is just enough to make you hungry for more. Or frustrated. I want a larger number of photos in a set, where I can look at the photos, and focus on the ones I like best. I can get large photosets at most mega-sites, where you get 50-100+ pictures in a set.

The site says they are emphasizing quality over quantity, but the quality is not any better than at the mega-sites like met-art (where Richard Murrian, the site photographer for m-u-s-e.org, has some photosets), or mplstudios, or a bunch of other mega-sites. Actually, the quality at the other sites is better, in my opinion, because the photographer tends to put a lot of shadows and "artsy" focus in his small photosets, making the number of photos that I really like even smaller.

You are not substituting quantity for quality if you join one of the quality mega-sites. You get both quality and quantity.

This site has a much smaller content. The archives go back several years, but I just don't like the idea and practice of a small number of photos in a photoset.

I believe you will be better satisfied, spending your money on a softcore mega-site, than at this site.

But if you are a Richard Murrian connoisseur, then the site might be worthwhile. I thought one Murrian photoset at met-art was really striking. But when I looked at the same set at m-u-s-e, I found a small set, with a smaller number of photos. Grrrr.

View Thread (3)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:07:04 PDT

Muse.org (1)

03-19-10 03:07am

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (4)

To lk2fireone (44):

Thanks for the review, can you tell me if the site is updating again now and if so how often?. The updates section of the tour shows the last update as 4th December 09. I've had this site in my list of sites to join for a while because they have some stunning looking models but i'm not convinced they have enough content to even justify a 1 month membership.

View Thread (3)

RE: Updated membership rates for muse.org

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:14:31 PST

Muse.org (1)

12-13-09 03:14pm

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (44)

To Drooler (194):

There were no updates in all of 2008.
The updates in 2009 just started a few months ago.
That is why the site is offering a free one-year membership to anyone who had a 1-year membership in 2008.
They are also offering a free 6-month membership to anyone who bought a 1-year membership in 2009 during rhe period it was not updating.
I joined for 1 year in March 2009, so I am supposed to get a free 6-month extension of my membership. I sent an email requesting the extension on Dec. 01, but have received no reply yet.

View Thread (2)

RE: Updated membership rates for muse.org

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:55:43 PST

Muse.org (1)

12-13-09 01:55pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (194)

To lk2fireone (44):

Was looking at the dates of the "most recent" updates. The site doesn't seem to update much. Either that or the dates are scrambled.

View Thread (2)

Muse.org Comment

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:40:28 PST

Muse.org (1)

12-13-09 01:40pm

COMMENT by lk2fireone (44)

Updated membership rates for muse.org

Special offer:

One year membership is $59.
I don't know how long the offer will stay open. This is for a one-year membership, non-recurring.

Terms for membership:

$59 one year, non-recurring

$25 one month, recurring
(rebilled at $19 every 30 days)

$35 one month, non-recurring

Visit Muse.org - View Replies - Add Reply

Muse.org Comment

Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:15:58 PST

Muse.org (1)

12-01-09 03:15pm

COMMENT by lk2fireone (44)

Free membership extension.

Because of the lack of updates at muse during 2008 and most of 2009, muse is offering to extend any annual memberships purchased during that time period.

If you bought an annual membership in 2008, you get a free 12-month membership.

If you bought an annual membership during the months of January thru September 2009, you get a free 6-month membership.

Visit Muse.org - View Replies - Add Reply

Muse.org Comment

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:16:18 PDT

Muse.org (1)

03-12-09 12:16pm

COMMENT by lk2fireone (44)

Special $59 offer for 1 year subscription to muse.org

Special $59 offer for 1 year subscription to muse.org

-Richard Murrian site (with some contributions by other photographers).
-He is softcore nude teen photographer, featured at Met-art.
-Very glamor-style, very softcore. Pictures are female solo models.
-Most models are teens, some in early 20s.
-Some really stunning-looking girls, some really great-looking pictures (but strictly softcore).

-photo series come in 3 resolutions: 2500 px, 1500 px, 1000 px
-plus a zip file for download of the photo series

-video formats: quicktime, divx, ipod
-payment by ccbill or verotel

Visit Muse.org - View Replies - Add Reply