<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - 18 Eighteen - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_26060</guid>
		<title>18 Eighteen Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26060</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/18eighteen.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter 18 Eighteen&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;18 Eighteen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (5)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-24-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:44pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 82&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3595&quot;&gt;Wittyguy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3595&quot;&gt;45&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ Almost all exclusive material focusing on the &amp;quot;teen&amp;quot; niche with 7 years of material available&lt;br /&gt;
+ No DRM&lt;br /&gt;
+ All pics come in 1600x1060 format with zips&lt;br /&gt;
+ Updates 5 days a week&lt;br /&gt;
+ Good $3 3 day full trial and $20 monthly membership through TBP
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Navigation is a pain but tolerable&lt;br /&gt;
- Primarily a photo site but there vids available&lt;br /&gt;
- Cancellation can be an adventure keep your sign up info on hand when you do cancel&lt;br /&gt;
- Some advertising on site to buy their products&lt;br /&gt;
- Older vids are very big and some only come in clips&lt;br /&gt;
- Inconsistent image sizes when you zip download
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;18Eighteen&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt; is proof once again that abstinence only education does not work.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;18Eighteen&lt;/a&gt; started out as a magazine and apparently continues as such as well as the website.  Like most porn magazines, they haven't fully embraced the on-line aspects and as such the site does suffer a bit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Navigation is a pain in the butt.  There is a model directory but it is pretty bare bones and offers no real preview of whats available.  Most of the images are in the monthly magazine section.  You get about 9-12 updates a month there.  You have to click on each model to see what their set contains.  Then they have other sections where updates are sometimes posted.  You really have to dig through the whole site to find everything.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the models have photo sets with the large pics.  Like others have noted, if you do a zip on the older material you might get something smaller than 1600x1060.  That seems to have been fixed with the newest postings.  I thought the images were mostly good quality although some of the older stuff gets grainy in the large size.  I did notice a couple of dead links on the images.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The models are not glam, for the most part they are attractive teens.  Most of the material is softcore with some dildo action and you get about 4 or 5 exclusivee hardcore sets per month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also get access to the now expired Babyface mag images which are mostly softcore.  Their achieve goes back to 2001 with Babyface only having about 16 months (100 models) worth of material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like I said this site isn't really about the vids.  Download speeds were just OK but the older vids sometimes only offered clips and came in at 320x240 on wmp.  The newest vids come in at 640x480 but the majority are in the smaller range.  There are probably around 100 vids and dvds, maybe more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been a member here numerous times in the past before they jacked their fees and excluded the full trial last year.  It's good to see this discounts back.  Cancelling was a little strange.  My info was not listed on the processor site and I had to cancel through the website itself.  I did not get a cancellation confirmation email until the next day.  A little strange but it worked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I like the fact that the teens are cute and natural (no plastic here) and the production value is pretty good.  It's almost all exclusive and, being a picture lover, this is good site in my book.  If you've never been you could probably get all you wanted through a couple of trial joins but at $20 a month that wouldn't be bad either.  It's not worth staying for more than a month unless you're a really big fan of the content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would score this site in the high 80's if they got their their navigation fixed, fixed some of the technical problems and had more movies available in the larger size.  A very good site to check out on the trial though.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1796&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit 18 Eighteen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26060&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=26060&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:44:38 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_8474</guid>
		<title>18 Eighteen Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8474</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/18eighteen.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter 18 Eighteen&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;18 Eighteen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (5)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-23-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:08pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 86&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;70&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Lots of content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Mostly cute models.&lt;br /&gt;
- Choice of small or large pics.&lt;br /&gt;
- Zips.&lt;br /&gt;
- Sticks to the &amp;quot;eighteen-y&amp;quot; niche&lt;br /&gt;
- Trial gives you full access, but join with a back up processor if you can. See below.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Navigation is a hassle, until you get used to it.&lt;br /&gt;
- Pics are not top-notch quality and have a grainy appearance.&lt;br /&gt;
- Vids section needs organization.&lt;br /&gt;
- Search function is bare-bones&lt;br /&gt;
- Don't read the text which accompanies the photo-sets, unless you think these girls are actually virgins.&lt;br /&gt;
- Cancelling can be a hassle. Save your sub ID number and other info.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I really like this site. This is mainly because of the nature of the content and not so much the physical quality of it, which leaves a bit to be desired. I'm refering to the pics mainly since I'm not much into video. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Going into the archives I was impressed that sets going back to 1999 still offer pics in large format, and by and large they look fair. If you look at pics that old at ATK, for example, ATK's look ancient by comparison. I understand that large size doesn't equal high-quality, but bear in mind this is a magazine site, and the pics have a magazine-ish look to them. Are they actually scans? I don't know. In the newer sets the large pics (landscape format) fill up my 22 inch monitor and don't look too bad at all. A great many look downright excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a marked emphasis on white panties which is as much a plus for me as it will be a negative for others. Elvis would have a good time here. As for the models: they are typically very cute and plain girls are scarce. There is definitely a teeny-bopperish feel to the site and the models fit perfectly with that kind of thing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elvis and me, we'd be mates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A word on the vids. The few I've downloaded so far look good, though some are so grainy they are unwatchable. The &amp;quot;submitted&amp;quot; vids section is very good, from what I've seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've only been here a week so I can't comment on updates. I'm here to collect the backlog anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Follow-Up:&lt;br /&gt;
The trial is no longer a full-trial, but now offers only limited access to the material.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1796&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit 18 Eighteen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8474&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=8474&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:08:44 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5865</guid>
		<title>18 Eighteen Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5865</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/18eighteen.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter 18 Eighteen&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;18 Eighteen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (5)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-11-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:08am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 69&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1859&quot;&gt;Schnitzel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1859&quot;&gt;29&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
-Majority of the models are probably 18, rather than 20/21.&lt;br /&gt;
-Mostly pretty models.&lt;br /&gt;
-No DRM.&lt;br /&gt;
-Ability to download pictures at different resolutions.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Video quality could be improved.&lt;br /&gt;
-Would like to see more updates.&lt;br /&gt;
-Content doesn't justify the cost.&lt;br /&gt;
-Site design is somewhat scattered.&lt;br /&gt;
-Some of the girls are uninspiring, they look like they'd rather be elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
-Scenes feel scripted and can get repetitive.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;18 Eighteen&lt;/a&gt; looks like a great site from the homepage. But what you see on the tour is basically as good as its going to get.&lt;br /&gt;
The video quality is poor by todays standards, even on the newer videos and the fact that the girls are uninspiring is a turn-off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are probably more pictures available than videos too, although one can download the pictures in ZIP archives at various resolutions which is fairly useful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you like the youngest porn possible, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;18 Eighteen&lt;/a&gt;'s content is certainly that, and is exclusive, models are physically attractive for the most part and fortunately DRM is not used.&lt;br /&gt;
If the site was $10 cheaper, then I'd probably recommend it, but they need to either lower the price or improve on the bad points.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until that happens, I would struggle to really recommend this site unfortunately.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1796&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit 18 Eighteen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5865&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5865&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:08:55 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4952</guid>
		<title>18 Eighteen Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4952</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/18eighteen.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter 18 Eighteen&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;18 Eighteen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (5)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-14-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:08pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 68&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=857&quot;&gt;Douggie&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=857&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*Exclusive girls&lt;br /&gt;
*Trial join&lt;br /&gt;
*pretty girls&lt;br /&gt;
* A euro site that actually has vibrators with   batteries!       &lt;br /&gt;
HUM
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Hate to be negative but......&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Very Very limited video&lt;br /&gt;
*Formats to finding videos are crappy&lt;br /&gt;
*Very limited updates&lt;br /&gt;
*A lot of video unable to play (corruption error  or weird format that cautions people when they try to install).&lt;br /&gt;
* There boasts about how often they update is    B.S.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					My postings are about video only......and mainly solo female video....I dont look at pictures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I belong to &lt;a href=&quot;http://thefemaleorgasm.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;thefemaleorgasm.com&lt;/a&gt;. I frequesnt there forum and there are several running posts about random sites. I told them I would check this one out.....ppppffffttt I have been here before. There homepage threw me off for some reason.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its been quite a while (I would say a couple of years) since I was last there. There wastn too much more being offered. I think they mainly update there photo section which is pretty common. Very limited video. Fewer yet videos that are solo. Glad they had a trial membership. I wouldnt pay much more even if it were monthly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its too bad.....with the models they get in. If they were to concentrate on solo video instead of pictures they would be a hit. Im not saying that cause Im a solo female fanatic.....but lets face it...there arent too many out there.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1796&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit 18 Eighteen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4952&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4952&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:08:32 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1771</guid>
		<title>18 Eighteen Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1771</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/18eighteen.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter 18 Eighteen&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/18eighteen/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;18 Eighteen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (5)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-22-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:08pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 77&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=346&quot;&gt;senorim&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=346&quot;&gt;17&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*exclusivity&lt;br /&gt;
*updating&lt;br /&gt;
*photo size 800*600 to 1000*1200
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*navigation confuse&lt;br /&gt;
*poor quality in general&lt;br /&gt;
*videographer and edition in videos&lt;br /&gt;
*selling everywhere
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Seems to me,they sales magazines and had the idea&lt;br /&gt;
to upload a porn site.Of course there's a lot of&lt;br /&gt;
(poor)photos.They have a few sections.By example=&lt;br /&gt;
hardcore,but it has only TWO VIDEOS!!&lt;br /&gt;
-Think the main problem on videos is the camera-&lt;br /&gt;
man:loose the focus,staggering in the interviews,&lt;br /&gt;
in zoom-out you can see the lamps??The girls,well-&lt;br /&gt;
some almost get sleep in solo session and I almost&lt;br /&gt;
fall down from the chair too!!.They drops the dil-&lt;br /&gt;
do,hits their head with the sofa.oh my!&lt;br /&gt;
There's a thing called EDITION.&lt;br /&gt;
-Expensive site,could cost 50% less.&lt;br /&gt;
-Under your own risk.&lt;br /&gt;
hit
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1796&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit 18 Eighteen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1771&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1771&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:08:46 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>