<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Stunners - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/stunners/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_64533</guid>
		<title>Stunners Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=64533</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/stunners/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/stunners.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Stunners&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/stunners/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Stunners&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-17-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:54pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 86&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3310&quot;&gt;Cybertoad&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3310&quot;&gt;77&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Lower Price under 20.00.&lt;br /&gt;
More HD and improved menu.&lt;br /&gt;
Wmv &amp; Mov format.&lt;br /&gt;
1000 Videos &lt;br /&gt;
2000 Pic collections.&lt;br /&gt;
Small Water Marks.&lt;br /&gt;
14 Sites included with membership.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Feels Allot Like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/twistys/&quot;&gt;Twistys&lt;/a&gt; and Other Sites in Format.&lt;br /&gt;
DL in peak hours seemed slow.&lt;br /&gt;
Some old stuff still circulating.&lt;br /&gt;
Stuff does not seem original ( but good quality)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The site uses CCbill and Epoch, and gives a feel of style and class. I did a review on here years ago for them, was surprised no updates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The content seemed original, but I thought I had seen some before. May have been from a  previous membership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are some newbies and some faithfuls like Vanessa Lane, and Jessica Jaymes&lt;br /&gt;
Zafira,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/audreybitoni/&quot;&gt;Audrey Bitoni&lt;/a&gt;,Shyla Stylez,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/breeolson/&quot;&gt;Bree Olson&lt;/a&gt; and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/anettedawn/&quot;&gt;Anette Dawn&lt;/a&gt;. Just to name a few.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Toads Take :&lt;br /&gt;
I was very please to see the site is now about 6.00 cheaper then it was in 2008 and is bigger and better now then it was then. Did not see any trial offers (darn).  Sites like these always have nice quality and incredible looking women even fully clothed. With the quality on here I would think you could have a non-nude site and people would join just to see hot women.&lt;br /&gt;
The site is not in MHO to hard and may be too  tame for others.  As it is with any site,to each his own.  But Stunners is like your favorite burger joint. You know what you need, and what to expect, and they deliver.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=17101&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Stunners&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=64533&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=64533&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:54:24 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
