<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Playful Coeds - All Activity</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/playfulcoeds/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_17157</guid>
		<title>RE: MargulisAZ's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16689#17157</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/playfulcoeds/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/playfulcoeds.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Playful Coeds&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/playfulcoeds/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Playful Coeds&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-07-08 05:50pm
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;MargulisAZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;64&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;MargulisAZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;64&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					After taking into consideration the two comments to this review, I have updated it and changed the score as well.  I was perhaps a bit harsh originally, and have since rewritten it to be as objective as possible.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16689#17157&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:50:31 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16740</guid>
		<title>RE: MargulisAZ's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16689#16740</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/playfulcoeds/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/playfulcoeds.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Playful Coeds&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/playfulcoeds/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Playful Coeds&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-28-08 10:50am
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=2947&quot;&gt;malikstarks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=2947&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=3742&quot;&gt;imagexxx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (Webmaster):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					Would have to side with the webmaster here; I thing you are missing the point of the site. If you were looking for a site with a bunch of hot porn chicks, you probably should have gone elsewhere. When judging an amateur site you should usually base it on how it compares with it's peers or other amateur sites. The strength of a good amateur site should be that it provides access to a particular niche, or to girls that can't be found elewhere. When I had a look over PlayfulCoeds; I have to admit, I hadn't seen any of these girls elsewhere (and they looked alright for amateurs).And they are providing a particular voyeuristic niche that you aren't going to get elsewhere. As far as the video quality, that is fair game enough, while many amateur sites do not have the resources to provide the vid quality of high powered network sites, the vids should at least be passable. As far as that is concerned, looking at the trailers, the vid quality could be a bit better. It's not horrible for an amateur site, but I've seen better even from others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the same time these guys are only asking 14.95 a month with a full access trial. I thought you could have given them some more points for that. All in all I see the webmasters vision here and if the vids improve like he says it will, they may have a winner.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16689#16740&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:50:16 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16704</guid>
		<title>RE: MargulisAZ's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16689#16704</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/playfulcoeds/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/playfulcoeds.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Playful Coeds&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/playfulcoeds/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Playful Coeds&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-27-08 07:39am
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=3742&quot;&gt;imagexxx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (Webmaster) &lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;MargulisAZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;64&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					I will admit that some of the girls on the site are not top notch models but I bet a ton of you would bang them after a few beers and we are a brand new site that has all original content and we have priced our site to reflect that with a discounted 14.95 recurring instead of the 19.99 or 24.95 else where on the net. And the videos are home videos of these girls after the bar or after we met them and talked them into it and these girls are not paid models like else where. Our girls are REAL amateurs who have volunteered to get dirty on video. A couple of our girls are smoking hot like Traci, Phoebe and Lacey. I guess it all comes down to personal taste and expectations. If you expect Fake boobs and hot models then this is not the site for you. We are a real amateur site that features real midwest college girls who are willing to take facial and do anal gang bangs so these are different girls than on the girls gone wild type sites. We have dedicated ourselves to improving the quality of content and our newer vidoes are a million times better than our older stuff but some of our older stuff was taken on vhs and cell phones.  This is not a studio production site. We have girls giving head in the woods and in public and shoot the content with what ever we have on us. We just happen to get the girls to say &amp;quot;playfulcoeds&amp;quot; so it seems really planned but these are just shot by the seat of our pants.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16689#16704&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:39:08 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16676</guid>
		<title>Playful Coeds News</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16676</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/playfulcoeds/&quot;&gt;
		&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/playfulcoeds.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Playful Coeds&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-26-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:02am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;NEWS&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=3742&quot;&gt;imagexxx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=3742&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Hello from playfulcoeds&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					Hello everyone. We are a fresh new site that features all exclusive content of real midwest amateur college girl's home videos and photo galleries.  We post regular updates in our members area.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16961&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Playful Coeds&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16676&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=16676&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:02:45 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>