PU - Score HD - All Activity

RE: No encryption on signup?

Sun, 01 May 2011 11:27:49 PDT

Score HD (1)

05-01-11 11:27am

COMMENT REPLY by slategrey (13)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

Well i signed up a couple of weeks ago and it is true that there is no encryption on the part you select your user name and pass but there is one after that part for the credit card info.

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:47:18 PDT

Score HD (1)

06-17-10 04:47am

COMMENT REPLY by nostromo (12)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

i want to join this site badly using a virtual credit card, but, nonetheless, i'm rotten with doubt due to the lack of encryption. Why pornsites have to be so iffy?

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:20:07 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-13-10 05:20am

COMMENT REPLY by BadMrFrosty (42)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

I had a poke around and it looks like they are using Jquery encryption to send the details to the server via Javascript. So even though the address itself is not SSL encrypted, the credit card details themselves should be. Try the signup form with javascript disabled, nothing works :)

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:52:23 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-12-10 06:52pm

COMMENT REPLY by malikstarks (8)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

I've personally never had a problem with any of the Score sites, and yes I was just recently a member of Score HD. I think the main reason they don't list the billing company on TBP is because they use so many different ones.

For instance, I think I've been a member of Score HD twice, the first time in December it was through Epoch, the second time earlier this year it was through Net billing. I've now canceled Score HD (not because it isn't good). However I still have a running membership to Scoreland which is billed through CCbill (from my checking account)

Score is a pretty reputable company, however you do need to be wary of the cross sells when signing up.

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:47:53 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-12-10 04:47pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To atrapat (110):

That's an interesting trick but I agree - I'm not about to enter the credit card info. I emailed the site to ask about the lack of encryption and here was their reply:

"We don't know why your Internet Explorer doesn't detect the (SSL) protocol. But we do want to assure you that our sites are secure. . Our website uses the Secure Socket Layer (SSL) protocol to securely transmit information on the Internet. Essentially, SSL creates a secure channel of communication between your computer and our Website's server. We are currently making updates to all our sites and we will be adding a secure Website Lock on all our sites. This will show as a Lock symbol on the top of the page which will provide our customer's the added assurance that our sites are completely secure and their information will be transferred securely. This system update should be completed by the end of the month. If you like you can revisit the site at the beginning of May and look for the Lock symbol on the top of the page. We thank you for your patience while this update is being completed."

So I guess I'll be looking at the site again in a couple of weeks.

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:27:55 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-11-10 10:27am

COMMENT REPLY by atrapat (110)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

Sincerely, I wouldn't enter my credit card info if I had to do the http-https trick. It was just to offer a certain degree of security in case you really wanted to join the site.

AFAIK, communications become secure once you use the https; the warning is because the URL you are accessing (scorehd.com) doesn't match the one in the certificate (score-cash.com). But communication is encrypted and an eavesdropper would only be able to intercept the communication if he were the owner of the score-cash.com certificate.

In this case, the trick works because the server happens to have an SSL certificate installed (even though domains don't match and you get a warning) but, obviously, not all servers will have one.

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:17:44 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-11-10 10:17am

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To atrapat (110):

I didn't know you could do that, but I did as you said and it did put up the encryption. But I also got the certificate warning where it says someone might be trying to intercept the data. Is that normal - and safe?

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:55:52 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-11-10 07:55am

COMMENT REPLY by atrapat (110)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

When I joined Christy Marks (also by Score) some time ago I also went through a similar page. I don't remember if the credit card page was sent through HTTPS but it was also a page hosted at score servers. I was eventually billed by an unheard of billing company but haven't had any issues afterwards.

You may try altering the http part to https. The server has a certificate but it is for score-cash.com domain (the page you receive is at scorehd.com); you will have to set up a certificate exception but you'll be able to join through a secure page.

Needless to say, an HTTPS certificate costs money (not much, just about a 100$ yearly) but for a company that conducts its business online is a must.

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:48:24 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-10-10 08:48pm

COMMENT REPLY by alexmedia (22)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

Yeah, strange join form. I've never seen like this before.

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:17:10 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-10-10 08:17pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To alexmedia (22):

join.scorehd.com

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:55:06 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-10-10 07:55pm

COMMENT REPLY by alexmedia (22)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

CCBill not only one good billing company. Probably they have their own merchant account. Do you remember what was domain where you have to enter your credit card info?

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:58:37 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-10-10 06:58pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To alexmedia (22):

It doesn't say who the billing company is - also not a good sign. If it's not CCBill, I'm wary. If it doesn't say at all, it's a no go for sure.

View Thread (13)

RE: No encryption on signup?

Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:41:31 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-10-10 06:41pm

COMMENT REPLY by alexmedia (22)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

What billing they used when you tried to sign up?

View Thread (13)

Score HD Comment

Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:13:44 PDT

Score HD (1)

04-10-10 05:13pm

COMMENT by RagingBuddhist (47)

No encryption on signup?

I went to join this site just now and noticed there's no encryption on the page where you enter your desired nick, password and email address OR the page where you enter your credit card information. That's on both Firefox 2 and Opera 10. I can hesistantly forgive the lack of encryption for the nick/password/email page, but not where you're entering credit card information.

Visit Score HD - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: messmer's Review

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:37:56 PDT

Score HD (1)

10-26-09 02:37am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To messmer (123):

In every aspect it's good - also in a nostalgic way - to learn about the new ways at this old site....

View Thread (4)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:48:57 PDT

Score HD (1)

10-25-09 09:48am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Denner (227):

BTW, I edited the review and made things a bit clearer re. Scorevideos. Thanks, Denner.

View Thread (4)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:29:00 PDT

Score HD (1)

10-25-09 09:29am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Denner (227):

The OLD Score site is indeed still alive, Denner. I should have stressed that, except that I was too interested in getting lots of videos in HD so I only put my head in once to get an idea of the quality of the old site!

View Thread (4)

RE: messmer's Review

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:06:50 PDT

Score HD (1)

10-25-09 09:06am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To messmer (123):

The OLD Score-site is still alive.
And thanks to messmers review/update/infos ect. I may go there again...
Fine and helpfull review!

View Thread (4)

RE: james4096's Review

Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:21:07 PDT

Score HD (1)

07-28-09 01:21pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To james4096 (126):

Thanks for the prompt reply and the info, James. Bottom right I can handle. :-)

View Thread (7)

RE: james4096's Review

Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:01:23 PDT

Score HD (1)

07-28-09 01:01pm

REVIEW REPLY by james4096 (126)

To messmer (123):

thanks messmer.

All the content for the new videos on every Score HD site have the same silver Score HD logo in the bottom right hand corner. You can see it on the preview page. The images are screen caps(same rez) so they show the same watermark. I'm not sure if that's an improvement. I've seen better, but i've also seen worse though. It's bigger than it could be, and you can't see through it, but a least they keep it in the corner. You get used to it. The stuff in the older score(640x360) video just has scorevideo.com along the bottom.

View Thread (7)

RE: james4096's Review

Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:25:48 PDT

Score HD (1)

07-28-09 12:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To james4096 (126):

Great review, James. One question: How large are the watermarks on some of the picture sets in the sub-sites now. I know that a couple of years ago 40plus and XL Girls were almost unwatchable because the logos were so huge. Are they more discrete now, and when it comes to the videos how intrusive are they in them? Thanks.

View Thread (7)

RE: james4096's Review

Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:02:11 PDT

Score HD (1)

07-27-09 07:02pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To james4096 (126):

Ah, this is what I'm talking about! Glad to see you found a site that you liked recently :)

Keep up the reviews lately, they have been great.

See ya around.

View Thread (7)

RE: james4096's Review

Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:35:38 PDT

Score HD (1)

07-26-09 08:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To james4096 (126):

Now that's a term I can understand. Brazzer tits are, by and large, enhanced with aftermarket adjustments by Dr. Gene and are becoming a total turn-off.

Naturals are best, by far.

When I was a Score member a few years back when the quality was lousy and the DRM was in force, at least the models were mostly (not always) natural.

And as James says, there were some "thick" ones in there with very large naturals bouncing on their very large bellies, but that's just fine. The assortment was good back then but the price and the HD have me interested; very interested.

Great review James. Thanks.

View Thread (7)

RE: james4096's Review

Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:15:29 PDT

Score HD (1)

07-26-09 01:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by james4096 (126)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

Good question.
Eh, little bit of both. You will see some chicks in there with mega implants, but also some with big natts. I don't know for sure cause I'm no expert, but they usually have a natural keyword in there if they are.

But everybody should be warned that some of the girls, especially the natural ones, may be a bit thicker every where else too. Especially in XL girls and Voluptuous.

To really appreciate this site you gotta like really big tits, not brazzers tits. Not for everybody.

View Thread (7)

RE: james4096's Review

Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:39:36 PDT

Score HD (1)

07-26-09 12:39pm

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To james4096 (126):

Pretty much have one question - Are they "big by good genes" or "big by good ol' Dr. Gene"?

View Thread (7)