<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Riot Girls - New Comments</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/riotgirls/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16684</guid>
		<title>Riot Girls Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16684</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/riotgirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/riotgirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Riot Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/riotgirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Riot Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-26-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:35pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;156&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Current info&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					RiotGirls is a new site that's packaged along with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bikiniriot/&quot;&gt;BikiniRiot&lt;/a&gt;.  But unlike &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bikiniriot/&quot;&gt;BikiniRiot&lt;/a&gt;, this one has bigger pics, at 1500px (and zipped!), and videos at 1280x720.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The models are all very hot (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/michellemaylene/&quot;&gt;Michelle Maylene&lt;/a&gt;, Karlie Montana, Neveah, Celeste Star, Carli Banks among them) and the quality of both the pics and vids are really nice and clear (with blurriness being an occasional problem).  It's like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bikiniriot/&quot;&gt;BikiniRiot&lt;/a&gt; girls went indoors on a bright day for some fun -- always with toys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, to date there are only 10 vids and 9 photosets on the site, which updates about every 4 days or so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the new site surpasses the original in some rather important ways.  Why not have zips and 1500px photos on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bikiniriot/&quot;&gt;BikiniRiot&lt;/a&gt; site, too?
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16886&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Riot Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16684&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=16684&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:35:28 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>