<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - AV Erotica - New Comments</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/averotica/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_42658</guid>
		<title>AV Erotica Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=42658</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/averotica/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/averotica.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter AV Erotica&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/averotica/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;AV Erotica&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-27-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:37pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=11370&quot;&gt;greg909&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=11370&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;AV Erotica&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					I'd like to add that while the model list is a bit repetitive, the photo image quality on this site is among the highest I've seen anywhere. I mean, not only are the images BIG in pixel dimensions, but the file sizes are impressive too, giving exquisite fine detail and no compression artifacts to spoil the pictures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other sites with similar sized pics (which also have some of AV's work), like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femjoy/&quot;&gt;Femjoy&lt;/a&gt;, often filter their image files to death so that even huge pictures have no detail in them.  Not so on AV Erotica!
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16744&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit AV Erotica&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=42658&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=42658&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:37:10 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_24452</guid>
		<title>AV Erotica Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24452</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/averotica/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/averotica.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter AV Erotica&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/averotica/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;AV Erotica&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-14-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:36pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4643&quot;&gt;Yonda382&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4643&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;My impression&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					I happened to the site tracking down pics of one fine model I have from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/metart/&quot;&gt;MetArt&lt;/a&gt; and from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femjoy/&quot;&gt;Femjoy&lt;/a&gt;. It was easy to spot the artist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A real delight if you are fan of the two sites above. Lots of outdoor shoots, generally of over 100 pics each. Many very wonderful and spell binding girls. Nice additions to collections from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/metart/&quot;&gt;MetArt&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femjoy/&quot;&gt;Femjoy&lt;/a&gt;. As said no duplicates, however many are from same day/location and are cut from series before or after those sold to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femjoy/&quot;&gt;Femjoy&lt;/a&gt; in many cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found the movies 'better' than either &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femjoy/&quot;&gt;Femjoy&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/metart/&quot;&gt;MetArt&lt;/a&gt;. I rarely download movies from either of them, but am finding avErotica more compelling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The daily updates have really bulked the site this year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If outdoor shoots of Russian girls with no tattoo's is your delight, then you will enjoy this site. The pictures sets are less glamor than &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/metart/&quot;&gt;MetArt&lt;/a&gt;, especially the outdoor ones. More earthy feeling overall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my book any 'outdoor shoot' is a leg up anyway, so that is my taste on the matter.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16744&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit AV Erotica&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24452&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=24452&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:36:29 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>