<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Nu Dolls - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/nudolls/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_34483</guid>
		<title>Nu Dolls Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=34483</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nudolls/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/nudolls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Nu Dolls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nudolls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nu Dolls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-01-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:15pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 84&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;218&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+40 different adorable, natural young women who smile a lot and make eyes at the camera and aren’t usually photographed staring into some mysterious and distant void&lt;br /&gt;
+No fake tits, and very little in the way of tats (exception:  Vlada, with a big one on her belly and a “V” right above the ...)&lt;br /&gt;
+Exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
+Photo quality is pleasing to the eye with sharpness and color&lt;br /&gt;
+Variety of indoor and outdoor shoots (though I’m more of an indoor man myself)&lt;br /&gt;
+191 photosets and 212 videos to date, usually combined into a single set (the extra vids are b/g hardcore or masturbation)&lt;br /&gt;
+Fast downloads of zips and vids that peak between 660-670 kbps (20MB nominal connection; using Firefox)&lt;br /&gt;
+Built-in “Doofus Recovery System”:  If you accidentally close all windows to the site, you can return without having to log in again&lt;br /&gt;
+Nice design and good, straightforward navigation&lt;br /&gt;
+Extensive blog area might be of interest&lt;br /&gt;
+Visitor’s area gives you a good idea of the content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-First post was late Oct. 2007.  That’s 10-11 photosets per month. &lt;br /&gt;
-Pics are 1549 pixels on the long end; for a site at this price, there should at least be 3000px photos as well.  (That would make it more competitive.)&lt;br /&gt;
-Some sets have less light than I’d like, but I guess that’s a matter of taste.  They’re not overly dark.&lt;br /&gt;
-Vids are only downloadable in avi (576x320)&lt;br /&gt;
-Vids have gotten shorter than they used to be (approx. 10 min. to approx 5-6 min)&lt;br /&gt;
-Models who have the same names:  Anna (4), Natasha (3), Tanya (4), etc. require you to give them additional (or alternative) names if you want to keep them straight&lt;br /&gt;
-Too much play with the props sometimes:  body parts viewed through spaces in chaise lounges, flowers all over the body (or sticking out of the Miracle-Gro), sand all over like tempura batter, a star-shaped dollop of cake icing above the ass -- stuff like that &lt;br /&gt;
-They have stopped doing hardcore (OK by me, but maybe not for the die-hards); last time was end of Nov. 2008
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Because the updates come approx. every 3 days, this site is better to join for the increasing size of its archives than it would be for the updates.  And that’s what I’ve done, having not been a member since May of last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The girls are lovely for the most part, and as I said, natural in their charms.  That’s a big plus for this site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of them have been making their mark at other sites as well.  &amp;quot;Anna S&amp;quot; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hegreart/&quot;&gt;HegreArt&lt;/a&gt; (also at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/metart/&quot;&gt;MetArt&lt;/a&gt; and FM Teens) is absolutely stunning!  &amp;quot;Anna&amp;quot; the extremely alluring dark-eyed brunette is also at FM Teens, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/teendreams/&quot;&gt;TeenDreams&lt;/a&gt; (as Tantsi), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femjoy/&quot;&gt;FemJoy&lt;/a&gt; as Paulina, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/justteensite/&quot;&gt;JustTeenSite&lt;/a&gt; as Anita, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/metart/&quot;&gt;MetArt&lt;/a&gt; as Atena.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I could list a few more, I'll just have to mention Viktoriya, who has smitten both Denner and I.  This girl needs MORE exposure!  I have seen her at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/justteensite/&quot;&gt;JustTeenSite&lt;/a&gt; as Victa, but that was some time ago.  Really, she should appear in oodles of updates at every high-quality softcore site in existence.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One little picky thing they could do is have each gallery open in a new window.  It is a picky point, though, as I’ve discovered that right-clicking on a gallery link in Firefox allows for the same thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that after a nearly year-long flirtation with occasional hardcore additions, they’ve decided to stick strictly to the softcore niche.  Frankly, I’m glad just because it will be clear that this is a softcore site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16740&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Nu Dolls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=34483&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=34483&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:15:30 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_20639</guid>
		<title>Nu Dolls Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20639</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nudolls/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/nudolls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Nu Dolls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nudolls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nu Dolls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-28-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:10pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 92&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;227&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Excellent quality in videos and photosets&lt;br /&gt;
Some great looking models - teens of (only) easteuropean origen. A few more average looking teens.&lt;br /&gt;
TEENS: sexy outfits: high heels, neglige and nylons (no socks or whatever) &lt;br /&gt;
Zip for photos (photos: 1549x1033)&lt;br /&gt;
Videos: AVI only (576x320) - but crisp! (full screen)&lt;br /&gt;
Updates looks ok for now - very new site&lt;br /&gt;
Updates seems to come almost dayly.&lt;br /&gt;
90 vids - a little less photosets&lt;br /&gt;
Most softcore - some hc&lt;br /&gt;
Good preview&lt;br /&gt;
Easy navigation - layout a bit simple.&lt;br /&gt;
Exclusive material
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Softcore videos/photosets has the upper hand&lt;br /&gt;
HC secondary - HC mainly in videos&lt;br /&gt;
Hardcore sets (video) are a bit strange - (great quality), but a little weird editing - like old softcore fucking-films. BUT some of the videos with everything, bj, threesome, fucking, closeups and so on.&lt;br /&gt;
BUT nok like any other average easteuropean site - this one has it's own style.&lt;br /&gt;
Download is mostly a bit slow: My average has been  350 Mb/sec.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I was taken in by the preview - thanks!&lt;br /&gt;
This site (even if it's US-based) has some of the most fine looking easteuro-teens. Some of them has only been seen at FM Teens - and they are just great!&lt;br /&gt;
A small, naughty blond: Viktoriya is a soft-star at FM Teens. But here she's doing hc b/g in 2 videos (I'm still thrilled here) and a great vaginal-balls video (6 videos of this doll)&lt;br /&gt;
What's great too is, that you do not get disapointed about number of videos compared to photosets - it ads up.&lt;br /&gt;
There is now about 90 vids, most softcore, but all in great quality - man, even if the average size is about 200 Mb.&lt;br /&gt;
NB: My foremost liking for this site is that these teens are not pseudo-look-a-like with mosyly pigtail and small cotton-socks.&lt;br /&gt;
These girl are in high heels and /or nylons - sexy, if you ask me!&lt;br /&gt;
This is a new site and the amount is still just average for what we PU's are used to at more qualified sites at around $30.&lt;br /&gt;
But it looks like they do a good job in updates - by all means not every day - but ALMOST! And the updates is always with videos - and sometimes with photosets from the same video.&lt;br /&gt;
I've &amp;quot;cooled off&amp;quot; here after a week of membership, but I can recommend this site for lovers of euro-teens in sexy outfits in fine quality videos&lt;br /&gt;
And the photosets are really fine too (Drooler: you may disagree).&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line: Great site - a bit like FM Teens but without all the pseudo lez-thing. And those solo-videos are among the best in this field of east euro-teens.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16740&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Nu Dolls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20639&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=20639&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:10:42 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
