<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Older Women - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_25871</guid>
		<title>Older Women Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=25871</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/olderwomen.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Older Women&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Older Women&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-18-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:22pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;messmer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;24&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Plenty of mostly attractive, mature models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Site is easy to navigate and gives you the choice of looking up the models by name or to seek for them under the various niches like hardcore, lingerie, upskirt, office, sports etc. that you might be looking for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Picture sets after 2007 are of a respectable size, some that I downloaded weighed in at 2001x1343, some at 1700 x 1133, that should be big enough for most. The complete set can be downloaded in one zip file. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Download speed was around 700 KB/s for me, not too bad for what is primarily a picture site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					And that's basically all the pros I could think of.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The picture sets are large but with little to differentiate one picture from another. A set half the size after some editing would be fine. A whole page (approx. 25 pictures) dedicated to a lady taking her suit jacket off is not my idea of excitement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quite frankly I found the ones I took a look at terribly boring as well. The photography is done by rote and lacks excitement. There is nothing bold, nothing &amp;quot;rude,&amp;quot; nothing that would make you sit up, especially when it comes to the solos. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A search engine is badly needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The videos are a joke. Tiny in resolution and tiny in length. If you should be tempted to watch anything in full screen, forget it. Each video is split up four, five ways into files of approx. 20.000 KBs each, which have to be downloaded separately. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non exclusive content that is shared in part with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;Aunt Judy's&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-exclusive streaming video scenes offered as a bonus but there is only a choice of maybe ten clip
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I re-subscribed to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;Aunt Judy's&lt;/a&gt; and took out a first time subscription to OW because, as an ex-member they made me an offer I couldn't resist, but in my estimation both sites are not even worth the special price I paid. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I could have written an identical review for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;Aunt Judy's&lt;/a&gt; because they could be clones of one another when it comes to boredom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My suggestion would be that they drop their present bunch of photographers and hire some who demand more of their models than an almost stiff, lifeless little strip that usually leads to nowhere ... or nothing much. Even my favorite niche, lingerie, contains very little that would offer any excitement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would not recommend this site to any lover of mature women until they get some models that show some life, or some photographers who can coax it out of them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They would also have to dramatically improve the quality of their videos before I ever thought of subscribing to this site or its sister site again.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1672&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Older Women&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=25871&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=25871&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:22:16 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1590</guid>
		<title>Older Women Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1590</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/olderwomen.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Older Women&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Older Women&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-14-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:04am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=429&quot;&gt;mudman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=429&quot;&gt;36&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Volume of images and decent videos&lt;br /&gt;
-Visual clarity for the most part.&lt;br /&gt;
-Reasonably easy to get around site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Images are in the 800 to 1000 pix range.  Not bad, but so yesterday and so unexciting.&lt;br /&gt;
-Nothing personal about the site and photo sets feel more formula than most. &lt;br /&gt;
-Just not a lot of excitment here.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-If you want a good mature overview, this is a good site, but don't expect anything really impressive.  The site comes in as okay and never anything more or more promising.  SOme really nice models and some so, so forgetable.  &lt;br /&gt;
-Photo set seem mired in formula.&lt;br /&gt;
-Check it out for a month, but don't go looking to stay longer. Nice for a visit and nice for judging other sites, not all that nice for the quality most users desire.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1672&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Older Women&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1590&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1590&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:04:55 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>