Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_21082 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21082 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/olderwomen.jpg" alt="Enter Older Women" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/"><b>Older Women</b></a> (2)<br> <br> 06-09-08&nbsp;&nbsp;06:56pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428">messmer</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428">24</a>)<br> <br> <b>Aunt Judy Clone!</b><br> <br> No wonder I had the uncomfortable feeling that "Aunt Judy's" wasn't making much of an effort to grow with the times when I was a member there. "Older Women" is owned by the same company and they appear to be concentrating on making this their quality site. Too bad it will be same old, same old for anyone who ever subscribed to AJ's. An improvement in quality is obvious, crisp pictures for one, even though they could be larger and the sets could contain more landscape format pics (granted, a subjective and personal thing.) But all the old "Aunt Judy's" props are found here: Model getting herself made-up in bathroom, model ironing a shirt etc. etc., only the faces are different. So, former AJ members be forewarned .. you'll be bored very quickly. Lovers of mature women who've never subscribed to the mother site will probably like it .. for a month. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1672"><b>Visit Older Women</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21082">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=21082">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:56:55 PDT