<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Older Women - All Activity</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_21166</guid>
		<title>RE: Aunt Judy Clone!</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21082#21166</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/olderwomen.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Older Women&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Older Women&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-11-08 02:37pm
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=4469&quot;&gt;TheRizzo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=4469&quot;&gt;19&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;messmer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;24&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;Aunt Judy's&lt;/a&gt; used to me my home as well when their was no other choice.  I agree it seemed things never improved.  Photo and video quality never got better.  And yet it was really the only site of its kind.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thankfully we got new options with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/allover30/&quot;&gt;All Over 30&lt;/a&gt; and Karups &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;Older Women&lt;/a&gt; that use the same kinda model but blow it out of the water.  I am not sure I'd ever be willing to try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/auntjudys/&quot;&gt;Aunt Judy's&lt;/a&gt; or their clone site out again to be honest.  I suppose if they really revamped and a few people gave it killer reviews but short of that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see you said in this site the photos are crisper so thats a start in the right direction.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21082#21166&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:37:27 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_21082</guid>
		<title>Older Women Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21082</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/olderwomen.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Older Women&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/olderwomen/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Older Women&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-09-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:56pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;messmer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;24&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Aunt Judy Clone!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					No wonder I had the uncomfortable feeling that &quot;Aunt Judy's&quot; wasn't making much of an effort to grow with the times when I was a member there. &quot;Older Women&quot; is owned by the same company and they appear to be concentrating on making this their quality site. Too bad it will be same old, same old for anyone who ever subscribed to AJ's. An improvement in quality is obvious, crisp pictures for one, even though they could be larger and the sets could contain more landscape format pics (granted, a subjective and personal thing.) But all the old &quot;Aunt Judy's&quot; props are found here: Model getting herself made-up in bathroom, model ironing a shirt etc. etc., only the faces are different. So, former AJ members be forewarned .. you'll be bored very quickly. Lovers of mature women who've never subscribed to the mother site will probably like it .. for a month.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1672&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Older Women&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=21082&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=21082&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:56:55 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>