PU - Public Flash - All Activity

RE: Still updating?

Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:31:04 PDT

Public Flash (2)

06-01-11 06:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To Jeffrey99 (27):

"When I was a member last (late last year) it appeared to be updating still, though I can't remember how frequently."

If you've never been a member before at all I think that you'll find that it is worth the membership fee just for what is there though.

You certainly point out a serious flaw in the site though: the fact that there is very limited information available to a prospective member. This really bugs me about some sites, especially when you compare them to sites that give full acess to see what is there and the only difference with a membership is that you can actually download. Sites like Public Flash always make me nervous - of they won't give me a good idea of what they have, then what are they hiding?

But with Public Flash you can take a membership with some level of confidence based on the reviews here and TBP.

View Thread (1)

Public Flash Comment

Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:51:46 PDT

Public Flash (2)

06-01-11 11:51am

COMMENT by Jeffrey99 (27)

Still updating?

I've had this site on my radar for a few years. The thing that keeps me from joining is that the front page/tour hasn't changed in that year. So my question is, is the site still updating? Or does anyone know?

Thanks,
Jeffrey

Visit Public Flash - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: mbaya's Review

Sat, 04 Dec 2010 16:35:43 PST

Public Flash (2)

12-04-10 04:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To mbaya (344):

Sterile... that's an apt description. I often wondered how they could take such a unique niche and make it seem so blasé and almost dull. But since they had Veronica Jett, I pretty much had to get a membership. I'd pay to watch her read a newspaper.

View Thread (5)

RE: mbaya's Review

Sat, 04 Dec 2010 16:13:41 PST

Public Flash (2)

12-04-10 04:13pm

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To rearadmiral (141):

I did not care for nudeinla. It seemed so cold and sterile. It looked liked posed photoshoots.

View Thread (5)

RE: mbaya's Review

Sat, 04 Dec 2010 10:48:39 PST

Public Flash (2)

12-04-10 10:48am

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To mbaya (344):

Agreed. They have the ability to produce some great material so if they could improve a bit on the technical side that would be icing on the cake.

have you ever had a membership at Nude in L.A.? It's a decent site too, but lacks on the nervousness aspect of public nudity.

View Thread (5)

RE: mbaya's Review

Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:51:12 PST

Public Flash (2)

12-03-10 07:51pm

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To rearadmiral (141):

I am glad you liked the review. I enjoyed reading yours, but I had to do something different. What good is a review if it rehashes a previous one? I definitely enjoyed the site and wish them well. Maybe at real HD 1920x1080 they will become the site I think they are capable of becoming.

View Thread (5)

RE: mbaya's Review

Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:37:53 PST

Public Flash (2)

12-03-10 05:37pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To mbaya (344):

Excellent review! As you note, I recently did a review and yet you somehow managed to write a similar length review and give people completely unique information. I thought I was fairly thorough, and when I read your review I kept thinking "yeah, he's 100% right... why didn't I think of that?"

I really like this site and hope they continue to add files and improve their quality.

View Thread (5)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:39:39 PST

Public Flash (2)

11-26-10 03:39pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To Denner (227):

Thanks for the comments, Denner. I like a lot of the European public nudity and flashing sites too, but Public Flash is quite different. Many European countries seem to have a more relaxed attitude to sexuality so those sites can get away with more than those in the U.S. With Public Flash, they show less nudity than the European sites but are in a real way more daring because of the risks involved. One thing I like about Public Flash site is that they show the set-up and you get a sense of how much fun the model is having and how excited she is at being 'naughty.' That element is missing from many of the European sites that simply have a nude woman walk naked down a main street. The American site Nude in L.A. is a lot like the European sites in that they do full nudity on the streets of Los Angeles, but they don't show the preparation and the nervousness. It all seems rather clinical.

One other site I'd recommend is FTV Girls. This is a well known site that doesn't market itself as a public nudity or flashing site but that has some great public stuff. All of the models are stunning, and most do some public stuff before going indoors for full nudity and masturbation. If you're a fan of public nudity and flashing and haven't been a memeber of FTV Girls yet I'd recommend considering that too.

View Thread (6)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:15:22 PST

Public Flash (2)

11-25-10 06:15am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To rearadmiral (141):

Very fine review, rearadmiral - and great to get a fresh review of a niche that to this user has become more and more positive/attractive...

A lot/some easteuro sites alike are still among the best - but this review gave me appetite to go browsing here - and now with some fine/important infos.....

View Thread (6)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:09:45 PST

Public Flash (2)

11-25-10 04:09am

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To RustyJ (116):

Thanks for the comment. I hope the review helps some fellow members.

View Thread (6)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:09:11 PST

Public Flash (2)

11-25-10 04:09am

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To mbaya (344):

It had been about two years for me too so I also wondered if there would be enough updates and if there would be improvements. I can tell you that there are new videos, and the highest resolution is an improvement over what they had in the past. In the past, the highest resolution was 630x470 and now it is 1280x720. Subjectively it looks fine.

I think I'll edit the review to give more objective information.

Thanks

View Thread (6)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 02:02:14 PST

Public Flash (2)

11-25-10 02:02am

REVIEW REPLY by RustyJ (116)

To rearadmiral (141):

Very good and comprehensive review. Thank you!

View Thread (6)

RE: rearadmiral's Review

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:10:03 PST

Public Flash (2)

11-24-10 11:10pm

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To rearadmiral (141):

It has been over two years since I was a member. What quality are the best videos? I see you said not up to current standards.

View Thread (6)

RE: bacardiancoke's Review

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:48:38 PST

Public Flash (2)

02-19-10 12:48pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To bacardiancoke (22):

Excellent review. Thanks for making it so detailed. I had been a member a year or so ago and downloaded most of what was there and I was actually thinking about joining again this weekend, but based on your review I think I'll skip it. You just saved me some cash. The bad news is, as has been pointed out, that this site had so much potential. This is a poorly served niche - U.S. publio nudity. I hope they come back with some new stuff soon.

View Thread (3)

RE: bacardiancoke's Review

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:56:56 PDT

Public Flash (2)

09-10-09 04:56am

REVIEW REPLY by bacardiancoke (22)

To mbaya (344):

yeah I agree and I think that it is a great pity that a site with such great potential has been allowed to stagnate.

View Thread (3)

RE: bacardiancoke's Review

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:48:16 PDT

Public Flash (2)

09-10-09 03:48am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To bacardiancoke (22):

Nice, fairly complete review of a site that I liked. You did a better job than mine did, but that was my first review. I am sorry to say that the site is not growing much or evolving and keeping up with the times. I thought the videos were not the best quality and I didn't appreciate that there was no option for a whole video download.

View Thread (3)