Nude in LA Review

Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:07:31 PST

Nude in LA (1)

03-04-10 09:07am

REVIEW = 75 by rearadmiral (141)

Pros:
- This site provides material in a poorly served niche � U.S. Public nudity
- Some beautiful women strolling fully nude in public
- At least a couple of well known stars participate (Hailey Young and Veronica Jett)
- Daring and different (for the U.S., anyway)
- Simple navigation (but how could it not be in a site this small?)

Cons:
- Small site (but it may grow)
- Pics are available, but no zips
- Videos are broken down into smaller files (approx. 35MB each)
- No option for full-length videos
- HD is available, but you have to pay extra for HD VOD
- Download managers don�t work (I use Free Download Manager but not to bring in multiple files at the same time � just to queue up files so I don�t have to sit at the computer and click �save as� all evening)

Bottom Line:
Excellent Premise, Flawed Execution

I�ve never been so torn in writing a site review. This site provides material that is almost impossible to find anywhere else � U.S. full public nudity. The site is small now (21 photo sessions with each session having shoots at four to six locations) but it does appear to be updating. I�m not sure of the update schedule. If I figure it out I�ll post an update.

I give full marks to the models on this site � they put themselves at some risk of getting caught. The material itself is very good if you�re into this thing. If not, it will seem tame and even boring. My only complaint about the material is that the editors have managed to strip away a lot of the titillation too. The site presents women nude in public but never shows the set-up or the girls� nervousness, which can be a big part of the draw for some people into this niche. The sense of daring is absent, much like it is on European sites. It shouldn�t be absent here though, since the models are at some risk doing this in the U.S. Otherwise, the women are beautiful and they get fully nude in public.

But� the owners or managers went and fucked it all up. This site is a credit to websites of 10 years ago. There are pics, but no zips. There are videos, but they are low resolution and broken down into smaller files. Download managers are not supported. They claim that HD videos are available, but you�ll have to pay extra for those once you�re inside the site.

There are things I�m willing to excuse: the site is new so there won�t be a lot of material yet. I understand that. But why put the models and crew at risk and then present the material in such a poor way? This is an under-served niche and those of us who like it would support a well done site. With changes, this could be a great site.

For now, this site is only a good value if you are a die-hard nude-in-public fan. If, as the grow the site, they improve the video quality and provide full-length videos they could be an amazing site in a poorly-served niche.

UPDATE March 30, 2010: in the one month of my membership I saw no obvious updates. There is still some decent material, but the site doesn't seem to be updating regularly.

Visit Nude in LA - View Replies - Add Reply

PU - Nude in LA - New Reviews

Nude in LA Review