<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Hot Rubber Babes - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/hotrubberbabes/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_13942</guid>
		<title>Hot Rubber Babes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13942</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hotrubberbabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/hotrubberbabes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Hot Rubber Babes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hotrubberbabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hot Rubber Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-22-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:31am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 69&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3226&quot;&gt;Ergo Proxy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3226&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The quality of the pictures is quite good with (mostly) 2240x1488 pixels, few are 1024x1536. The average number per gallery is about 80 (more or less). From a latex fetishistic point of view the pictures are great, especially the catsuit shoots which are quite a lot. The photographer knows how to catch the details of the material and the beauty of the girls. Over 90% of the models are very appealing. They have a natural beauty and are real rubber lovers I think.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					First of all I've found at least 9 galleries (they have 28 total) which are identical to the pictures on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fetishworlds.net&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.fetishworlds.net&lt;/a&gt;. This is a site which features panty girls, large vs. small girls, latex girls and flexi girls (similar to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/zlata/&quot;&gt;Zlata&lt;/a&gt;). To my knowledge the last update there was about 3 years ago. The monthly cost for that site is nearly the same as the current site (26.95$ per month, CCBill). Same goes to fets-fash-girls.de.&lt;br /&gt;
Biggest Con : Old galleries, possibly nothing new  in the future.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					First of all the monthly cost of about 30$ per month is FAR to high. I only joined one month in order to search for sets which were not in my collection (call it nostalgic or something?) Even if the few galleries were superior to other sites the cost would outweigh the gain. Time will tell if there will be new stuff in the future. I am afraid the chance is very low. Concerning the date of the last galleries they may be update every two weeks or so. If you are really into latex and rubber it would be interesting to join for a short period just to check out some of the beautiful rubber girls. For others I would not recommend it.  Perhaps check back in one, two months. I will defintively observe their work on this site in the future.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16385&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Hot Rubber Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13942&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=13942&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:31:08 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>