PU - Fucking Machine 1000 - All Activity

Multiple Site News

Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:16:45 PDT

Multiple Sites (410)

07-23-09 09:16pm

NEWS by Netsirk (24)

Downloadable HQ Files

Hi everyone,

I wanted to keep you updated on the situation with our HQ downloadable files.

We began an upgrade process that forced us to swap the normal HQ .avi files for some H264 encoded .mp4 files. Now, our MAC and iPod friends have loved these files while others are not fans.

The good news is they're only temporary and will be replaced soon.

We had a hiccup with the upgrade that delayed us a bit but we're back on track. You'll start seeing the new high-quality .wmv files showing up on our new/newer content this weekend and spreading throughout the back catalog over the next week or two.

We apologize for the delays and thank our members for their patience. You guys are awesome!

View Replies - Add Reply

RE: ace of aces's Review

Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:45:07 PDT

Fucking Machine 1000 (1)

10-29-07 01:45am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To asmith12 (124):

thanks for reply asmith12,

i think that my last done ratings are a little bit more like that you have searched for. but anyway i will try to improve my next ratings in the bottom line to show how a little bit more how the site-specific information make me make my ratings like this.

View Thread (4)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:10:10 PDT

Fucking Machine 1000 (1)

10-28-07 03:10pm

REVIEW REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To ace of aces (179):

> but i don`t think that my given information are wrong......
I didn't mean it; what I've actually meant is that I'd like to see more site-specific information which would show why your ratings are different.

> they took another which didn`t accept credit cards or something like
> this. i also think there was no possibility to dl in one part,
> and the older videos had weak quality (wasn`t it dl as a zip?!) you
> are a member of that side right now? does anything changed?
I'm/was a member of a few other kink.com sites (see my reviews of UltimateSurrender and SexAndSubmission), and yes, their billing/authentication system is still a pain in the neck (they do provide alternative billing though, so occasionally it does work :-) ). As for DL as a zip - they usually do have it (you can get whole single episode as a zip, which is enough for me). Cannot be 100% sure about fuckingmachines.com without being their member, but usually such things are quite consistent across different kink.com sites.

View Thread (4)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:32:51 PDT

Fucking Machine 1000 (1)

10-28-07 10:32am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To asmith12 (124):

hello asmith12,
thanks for youre reply.
my ratings are, i think like every rating, a question of personal taste.
my specific look at a side is from the pov of (mass)dol of videos. so you may are right that they are maybe similar. but i hope that my given information helps others who share the same aim.
i do not exactly know what you mean by rating with a to big range.

i am sad to read that my informations are not exactly enough for you, but anyway everyone is seeking for other information which is like his style.

thanks for youre hint to the side fuckingmachines.com. i tried it i think a year ago and liked it much, but in my remembering there was a big problem with the billing company. they took another which didn`t accept credit cards or something like this. i also think there was no possibility to dl in one part, and the older videos had weak quality (wasn`t it dl as a zip?!) you are a member of that side right now? does anything changed? :)

last but not least, you are welcome to rate me in which kind you want to, as i said, in my opinion it`s at least a question of taste which make the points :)..but i don`t think that my given information are wrong......

View Thread (4)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:56:25 PDT

Fucking Machine 1000 (1)

10-27-07 02:56pm

REVIEW REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To ace of aces (179):

Just in case if you do care (if not, please ignore):
What I think is the biggest problem with your reviews, is lack of specific information about the sites - all reviews are quite similar to each other, and it is very difficult to understand why do you rate site higher or lower. I was going to put 'no' trust rating exactly because of 2 your reviews: this one and 'Obscene machines'. Reviews are very similar to each other, and it is not clear why one of the sites got much higher rating (14 point higher - that's quite a lot). Then I went to site home pages and was able to guess what's the difference between them, so your ratings are likely to be consistent (so I didn't put any trust rating for now), but IMHO it should be obvious from reviews too.

Also a side note: as you're into this niche, did you try fuckingmachines.com? It would be nice to see your review/rating of them too (so it will be possible to compare it with other 2 sites you already reviewed).

View Thread (4)