Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/beautyandthesenior/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_58811 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=58811 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/beautyandthesenior/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/beautyandthesenior.jpg" alt="Enter Beauty And The Senior" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/beautyandthesenior/"><b>Beauty And The Senior</b></a> (1)<br> <br> 03-22-11&nbsp;&nbsp;08:00am</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870">Denner</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870">227</a>)<br> <br> <b>The exact same content as Oldje..or?</b><br> <br> Been a fan of <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/">Oldje</a> for - yes, now years - but have not been there lately.<br /> And the price of about $39 compared to the price of $ 19 here got to make you think. In the previews it's just VERY close.<br /> So if you can get the same material for about half the price?? <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15922"><b>Visit Beauty And The Senior</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=58811">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=58811">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:00:27 PDT pornusers_20405 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20405 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/beautyandthesenior/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/beautyandthesenior.jpg" alt="Enter Beauty And The Senior" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/beautyandthesenior/"><b>Beauty And The Senior</b></a> (1)<br> <br> 05-20-08&nbsp;&nbsp;03:01pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4307">doctorbull</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4307">0</a>)<br> <br> <b>But is a twin of Oldje</b><br> <br> Customers must know that <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/beautyandthesenior/">Beauty and the Senior</a> contains the same movies of <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/">Oldje</a>. Here the only differences:<br /> - currently (May 2008) BATS has more or less 100 scenarios and <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/">Oldje</a> reached 230<br /> - BATS provides WMV files, and they are larger in size but worst in quality, while OJ provides RM files (Real Video); videos are better in OJ<br /> - on the other side, the photo series are bigger in BATS, and with pictures larger than OJ (though they appears retouched, 'cause the skin of the models is clear as milk and they seem wax dolls; this doesn't affects their agreeability)<br /> Both sites ensure fast downloads. But the material is the same (BATS being a sub-part of it), and OJ has better videos while BATS has better pictures. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15922"><b>Visit Beauty And The Senior</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20405">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=20405">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Tue, 20 May 2008 15:01:56 PDT