Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/videosexperts/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_41516 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41516 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/videosexperts/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/videosexperts.jpg" alt="Enter Video Sexperts" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/videosexperts/"><b>Video Sexperts</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 10-26-09&nbsp;&nbsp;05:03pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=310">OneMan</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=310">27</a>)<br> <br> <b>Bitrates Please</b><br> <br> I notice from a survey of these v2.0 reviews, that some are including just the file size....not always of any use in gauging quality, wheras some are including bitrates.<br /> <br /> Could we have some consistency please ? Bitrates are the most useful indicator of quality, as without knowing the length of a vid., the size is pretty irrelevant.<br /> <br /> Thnx <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15570"><b>Visit Video Sexperts</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41516">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=41516">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:03:46 PDT