<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Anal Pantyhose - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/analpantyhose/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_66543</guid>
		<title>Anal Pantyhose Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=66543</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/analpantyhose/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/analpantyhose.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Anal Pantyhose&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/analpantyhose/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Anal Pantyhose&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-15-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:55am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=12274&quot;&gt;BadMrFrosty&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=12274&quot;&gt;42&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ Approx 150 video sets and 200 photo sets&lt;br /&gt;
+ All exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
+ Zip downloads for photos&lt;br /&gt;
+ No DRM, no download limits&lt;br /&gt;
+ On the whole video quality is great, the first 100 videos are only 640x480 but look good. The last 50 are HD 720P but dont look as crisp as they should (see con)&lt;br /&gt;
+ Download managers supported and should be used to get good speeds (~300kbps without, ~1mbps with)&lt;br /&gt;
+ Latest image sets are 1500x1000 and look nice. Older sets are 1024x768 and are average&lt;br /&gt;
+ ~75 photos per set all focusing on anal action with pantyhose&lt;br /&gt;
+ Great looking Russians, some famous faces but are hard to spot due to the very unique and natural style of clothing, sets and makeup.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Short scenes ~15 min long each&lt;br /&gt;
- Large watermarks. Worse on the older 640x480 clips&lt;br /&gt;
- HD videos use too low a bitrate (3mbps) resulting in noticeable artifacts and graininess.&lt;br /&gt;
- No choice of download formats, just one full clip in wmv for each scene&lt;br /&gt;
- No streaming&lt;br /&gt;
- Photo sets are separate from the video even if they are shot at same time and obviously the same scene&lt;br /&gt;
- Some videos waste a lot of bandwidth on unnecessarily high bitrate audio at 320kbps. &lt;br /&gt;
- The site has a update log but not all content is listed. On the video and picture update pages the content is not dated making it hard to see how often the site is updated&lt;br /&gt;
- Very basic interface. No search, no model index, no scene description, only a single scene thumbnail, no streaming. Basically no real way to see what you get before downloading the video.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Here we have another classic example of a group of people that know how to choose the models, how to dress a set, direct the action, get the best angles, choose sexy clothing and makeup etc but have no idea how to wrap a usable website around it. I am not a massive fan of the analogy but I do feel a couple are apt when summing up this type of site which, unfortunately, I tend to see a awful lot. Would you set up shop selling a Bugatti Veyron other super cars in a dealership that looks like it used to be a McDonalds? Or design the packaging of a new all singing, all dancing smart phone to resemble a tin of Tesco value beans? In a market that is overflowing with porn it is hard to choose to stay a member of a website that makes it hard to consume its, admittedly good, content. Given a single (tiny) thumbnail and the generic model names, I have no way of knowing if I like the model or scene setup without downloading the whole scene. And when I do find a model I like I have no way of searching for more of her scenes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line: Plenty of sites polish turds. This site wraps a diamond in a natural unpolished turd. I wouldn't mind the diamond but I am not too keen on getting my hands dirty in order to get it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15550&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Anal Pantyhose&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=66543&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=66543&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:55:14 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_29515</guid>
		<title>Anal Pantyhose Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=29515</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/analpantyhose/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/analpantyhose.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Anal Pantyhose&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/analpantyhose/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Anal Pantyhose&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-05-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:02pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 95&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6107&quot;&gt;Low End&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6107&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Site is amazing if you love character.  When you join the site, you immediately get access to a bonus site, then, after each 7 day period as a member, you get access to another.  There are some really bizarre bonus sites that are way not my style, but there are at least 4 or 5 that make this site worthwhile.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Models always have clothing on, and typically panty hoes.  There is an appearance of role playing, but it's in another language, so who knows what they're saying.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very little vag penetration, almost entirely anal.  Definitely a sense of submission in the female models.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you're looking for something new and want the girls to keep some clothes on, this is a must join.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The male models don't get in the way, nor are they objectionable.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The bonus sites are really bizarre.  Lots of gay/tranny/girl on guy stuff, but you don't have to add them.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video quality isn't HD or even crystal clear, but it's decent.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not many updates, nor a ton of pre-existing content.  But again, the stuff that's on there is great.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					One of my favorite networks.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15550&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Anal Pantyhose&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=29515&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=29515&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:02:47 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
