PU - Ass Traffic - All Activity

RE: Out of business

Mon, 17 May 2010 18:44:44 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

05-17-10 06:44pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (233)

To anyonebutme (14):

You are correct. That is exactly what happened. I believe he's directing for Evil Angel. The money must have been too good to pass up.

View Thread (2)

RE: Out of business

Mon, 17 May 2010 17:45:51 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

05-17-10 05:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by anyonebutme (14)

To williamj (9):

I thought the guy who ran the site, Raul Cristian, just didn't want to continue with the sites. I think he went and worked in L.A. for awhile. Or I don't know.

View Thread (2)

Ass Traffic Comment

Mon, 17 May 2010 17:34:44 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

05-17-10 05:34pm

COMMENT by williamj (9)

Out of business

Google dev8 entertainment ltd. It seems they got hit with some SPAM law suits and shut down. They are no longer Updating any of the sites. Too bad they where pretty cutting edge a few years back. I thought they offered a good product. I wish other companies had the navigation and overall quality they offered. Any information on what happen would be welcome. I'm curious.

Visit Ass Traffic - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: shinobi's Review

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:53:36 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

03-29-10 01:53pm

REVIEW REPLY by shinobi (6)

To BadMrFrosty (42):

Thanks for bringing this up, i agree that's not fair so i'll have to add that as a con and revise my score to reflect it

View Thread (5)

RE: shinobi's Review

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 06:14:43 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

03-29-10 06:14am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To shinobi (6):

This is a fine review - and very useful to other PU - seems like nothings left out here - if this user - once again - consider joining Ass Traffic this is where I'd seek those many detailed infos...

View Thread (5)

RE: shinobi's Review

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 01:56:52 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

03-29-10 01:56am

REVIEW REPLY by BadMrFrosty (42)

To shinobi (6):

Nice review :)

I have wanted to join this site for a while but wont as they have regional pricing in place. No matter how good a site is I wont allow myself to be ripped off because of where I live.

View Thread (5)

RE: shinobi's Review

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:43:23 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

03-28-10 10:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by shinobi (6)

To dracken (213):

Review updated in much greater detail on the technical side of things

View Thread (5)

RE: shinobi's Review

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:11:59 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

03-28-10 06:11pm

REVIEW REPLY by dracken (213)

To shinobi (6):

Awesome review, thanks for sharing all that and showing me a new site.

However, in future reviews I'd add a bit more data, some more personal feelings on how the site is...maybe some ideas on navigation and what kind of videos are available (sizes and WMV or MPG or MP4...)

View Thread (5)

Ass Traffic Comment

Fri, 08 May 2009 06:19:45 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

05-08-09 06:19am

COMMENT by Dmander6 (0)

The only downside

The biggest downside to Ass Traffic is that they do not exploit ASS to MOUTH more. In many of the scenes you can see that the cocks are getting nicely covered and smeared with brownish fecal matter from the girls asses - but for some strange reason they rarely make a point of pulling out the fecal covered cock and slamming it straight down the throat of the girl or even better ANOTHER girl!

For fans hard ANAL I must say that this is the thing that is laking the MOST on the web these days.. - A site that has it's main focus on fucking one girl up the ass until the cock is all browed up and then deep throating another teen girl or have her lick all fecal juice of like a lollipop - clearly seeing it going right in to the taste buds.

If any one know of a good girl to girl ATM site I'd be glad to hear about it.

Visit Ass Traffic - View Replies - Add Reply

Ass Traffic Comment

Fri, 08 May 2009 05:55:38 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

05-08-09 05:55am

COMMENT by Dmander6 (0)

Great BIMBO sluts POUNDED in the ASS

Over all Ass Traffic is a great site for fans FULL FORCE ANAL - most of the studs are pretty well hung and they tend to really ram the young girls really hard and balls deep. There are many ANAL sites but a lot of them feature a lot of vaginal sex and tend to go soft when it comes to the anal part only going half way with cock and much too gentle. At Ass Traffic it's straight to the ass full speed after oral. A lot of the scenes have a nice rawness getting the girl down on her knees ramming cock up her ass as hard as possible. If you like seeing young girls scream with a pained look on the face while getting ass hammered there is a lot of good moments here. -although in some of the scenes the girls show too much pleasure for my taste.

The last guy' comment about the girls makes no sense to me at all. -Over the top BIMBO styled sluts with fake tits, fake long nails, high heel plateau shoes, pop girl clone hair does rule - FAKE tits RULE - it's a must!

Visit Ass Traffic - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: DdTT's Review

Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:25:22 PST

Ass Traffic (2)

11-25-08 08:25am

REVIEW REPLY by DdTT (3)

To williamj (9):

Yes, excellent!

View Thread (2)

RE: DdTT's Review

Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:33:16 PST

Ass Traffic (2)

11-05-08 12:33pm

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (9)

To DdTT (3):

I've been a member to their other sites like GiveMePink and Fist Flush. Excellent xxx hardcore porn!

View Thread (2)

Ass Traffic Comment

Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:15:46 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

07-10-08 05:15am

COMMENT by mbaya (344)

boring

I was very disappointed with this site. The women were too thin, nearly anorexic, too many bleach blonds, too much makeup. The platform shoes were a turnoff. The scenes were almost identical with very little variety or creativity. After about 10 videos I could predict the looks of the next cloned girl as well as the cloned action.

Visit Ass Traffic - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: joekerr1's Review

Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:51:39 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

06-05-08 05:51am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (253)

To joekerr1 (4):

Great review.

View Thread (3)

RE: joekerr1's Review

Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:59:05 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

06-02-08 12:59pm

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (9)

To joekerr1 (4):

Good review. I know they frequently read comments and reviews. They listen to their cunstomers. I wish they would offer a girl/girl site.

View Thread (3)

RE: joekerr1's Review

Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:57:13 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

06-02-08 08:57am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To joekerr1 (4):

joekerr1:

This network of sites renames some of their girls for reasons I know not. However, the network hosts this FREE site: http://www.indexxxed.com which summarizes a lot of things including on which of its 10 sites a specific girl appears.

I'm still waiting for these guys to offer a multi-site access package of some kind. The previews are terrific and they seem to do a great job finding the right babes to do their thing.

Good review. Thanks.

View Thread (3)

Ass Traffic Comment

Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:34:27 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

03-22-08 12:34am

COMMENT by Flimo (0)

Over 40$ for europeans

If you join from an European country, you have to pay 29.95 EUR, which equals around 44 $

Visit Ass Traffic - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: King's Review

Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:22:46 PST

Ass Traffic (2)

11-06-07 03:22am

REVIEW REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To King (27):

> Guys, please treat women with respect
Couldn't agree more.

View Thread (1)

RE: High Speed Download

Thu, 04 Oct 2007 02:45:05 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

10-04-07 02:45am

COMMENT REPLY by williamj (9)

To roseman (253):

The downloads from this site and all the other sisters sites is really amazing. Whatever software they use should be standard for every other web site. They do a great job in pushing that ass right up on your screen fast...

View Thread (5)

RE: really nice site

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:28:35 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

08-27-07 09:28am

COMMENT REPLY by gene2112 (0)

To im3dia (0):

I would like to give a shout out to the customer service of Ass Traffic. I had joined their site but had internet connectivity issues among other user related problems, and was not able to enjoy my membership at all. I sent a letter of regret to the company that due to faults of my own that I was not able to enjoy my brief (but expensive) membership. They gave me another membership (extension) free of charge. I was blown away. Kudos.

View Thread (3)

RE: High Speed Download

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:19:27 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

08-20-07 11:19pm

COMMENT REPLY by roseman (253)

To apoctom (145):

Good question.
I own a 2 Mbps (2048) adsl connection and when I download files from the site that you mention, I mostly get download speeds of 200 - 220 K/Sec (which are the highest that I can get).

View Thread (5)

Ass Traffic Comment

Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:59:48 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

07-11-07 08:59am

COMMENT by apoctom (145)

Great Site

I've always enjoyed this site, except for its focus on (eastern) European women. I wish that they would expand the types of women they seek for models.

Visit Ass Traffic - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: High Speed Download

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 09:23:44 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

07-02-07 09:23am

COMMENT REPLY by apoctom (145)

To roseman (253):

Could you give some figures for what speeds you are getting? For instance, what is your connection speed and what speed is the download? Like the previous reply, I often don't think about download speed when signing up, and then it just drags over my high-speed cable connection. Thanks in advance.

View Thread (5)

RE: really nice site

Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:15:18 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

06-19-07 05:15pm

COMMENT REPLY by im3dia (0)

To nygiants03 (160):

Who said eastern European ass goes cheap?

View Thread (3)

RE: High Speed Download

Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:28:36 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

06-12-07 09:28am

COMMENT REPLY by roseman (253)

To Jay G (63):

hehe, you are welcome.

View Thread (5)

RE: High Speed Download

Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:41:00 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

06-12-07 08:41am

COMMENT REPLY by Jay G (63)

To roseman (253):

Thanks for the info! Speed is something I don't often think of when choosing web-sites until I try to download and it takes...................forever. Thanks for the good info!

View Thread (5)

RE: really nice site

Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:43:45 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

06-06-07 08:43am

COMMENT REPLY by nygiants03 (160)

To im3dia (0):

one of the most expensive to.

View Thread (3)

Ass Traffic Comment

Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:46:56 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

06-05-07 10:46pm

COMMENT by im3dia (0)

really nice site

Although I think they can improve their overall usability, Asstraffic is one of the best websites around when it comes to hard anal movies!!!

Visit Ass Traffic - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: cakeweasel's Review

Sat, 05 May 2007 13:25:50 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

05-05-07 01:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To cakeweasel (1):

I agree with your second con. First videos (older) were softer and much more enjoyable. Spitting, slapping...no thank you.. Too bad, my money goes elsewhere :)

View Thread (1)

Ass Traffic Comment

Fri, 06 Apr 2007 03:22:16 PDT

Ass Traffic (2)

04-06-07 03:22am

COMMENT by Marianna (40)

luv it!!!!!

i love this site! i find it so cool and contents quality is very high!

Visit Ass Traffic - View Replies - Add Reply

Ass Traffic Comment

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 04:39:16 PST

Ass Traffic (2)

02-10-07 04:39am

COMMENT by roseman (253)

High Speed Download

AssTraffic has one of the fastest download speed I have seen on an adult site. I have joined similar websites and now I understand why the price of asstraffic is a little high, its cause of the site's quality. The fact that they allow download accelarators improve that their download servers have high speed and do not have lagging problems. I just felt that I had to add that. I am just wondering why they do not give network access for their other sites, the price could be a little higher but I believe that they would gain from such a deal.

Visit Ass Traffic - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: roseman's Review

Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:29:32 PST

Ass Traffic (2)

02-06-07 10:29am

REVIEW REPLY by mudman (36)

To roseman (253):

Roseman:

Now I'm lost. Which cut in stone web site are you referencing. You've review 27 of them.

Every site needs to offer a basic basis of quality. Every member or potential member deserves this much. Videos need to accessible to all and photos need to be clear, seeable, large enough and somewhat appealing. This certainly places some constraints upon artistry, but not unreasonably so.

Are you suggesting that anything goes, if the particular site's subject matter agreed with your or whomever interest, is okay? Seems an insufficent standard to me. Everything out there need to live up to more, as the majority is falling way short. We user/members feed this beast with our subsciptions, our money, so we should get quality regardless of the site. So I find so problem on not addressing any one failing site over another. The problem is in the system. It wants us to accept too much mediocrity as some form of quality. "Here's a great site, now spend you money and be unhappy with it."

I don't think I'm opposing you, but we may not be being as clear with each other as would be desireable.

mudman

View Thread (3)

RE: roseman's Review

Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:29:46 PST

Ass Traffic (2)

02-06-07 07:29am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (253)

To mudman (36):

LOL.
Well, mudman if you have ANY questions about the concrete website that I did review please feel free to ask.
I feel that answering to your general questions about photos and videos has NOTHING to do with this site.

View Thread (3)

RE: roseman's Review

Mon, 05 Feb 2007 10:59:16 PST

Ass Traffic (2)

02-05-07 10:59am

REVIEW REPLY by mudman (36)

To roseman (253):

Roseman_

You've hit me, so here's my inquiry.

What do you find wothwhile when it comes to photography? What size of image and what quality? Do you have interests in lighting or not?

Are there photographers you are impressed with or are you being ignored here?

With regards to videos, regardless of subject matter what isues to you have? Every site should offer enough formats for all to enjoy, and every video should be clear enough for anyone to see and appreciate. Since I'm even mentioning this, it's not something we've been burderned with. Which sites, in your opinion, serve us viewers as we should be served?

View Thread (3)