PU - Monster Pimps - New Comments Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/monsterpimps/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_15392 Monster Pimps Comment http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15392 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/monsterpimps/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/monsterpimps.jpg" alt="Enter Monster Pimps" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/monsterpimps/"><b>Monster Pimps</b></a> (2)<br> <br> 01-24-08&nbsp;&nbsp;09:03pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613">WeeWillyWinky</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613">70</a>)<br> <br> <b>Clarifications</b><br> <br> Sometimes when I do a review I forget that most people are much more into video than pictures, so when I say the site is not for the hardcore fan, I am mainly refering to the picture content. The video sites at this network fall into the hardcore category, particularly <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/lipstickbj/">Lipstick BJ</a> and <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/exploitedsecretaries/">Exploited Secretaries</a>, but the amount of vids at either site is still pretty small and the content is not extreme in any sense. <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyjobs/">Panty Jobs</a> is more tease oriented, but still hardcore by definition, I suppose. <br /> <br /> The picture sites at this network are pretty decidedly softcore despite some stronger material. Bottom line is, I wouldn't recommend this site to someone who is primarily interested in hardcore video. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15367"><b>Visit Monster Pimps</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15392">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15392">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:03:31 PST