RE: atrapat's Review

Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:28:33 PDT

Club Sophie Dee (2)

08-05-08 02:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (48)

To uscue (30):

You pretty much nailed it with your review back in 12-2007. The quality isn't that good. But, IMHO, when discussing a solo model site, it's also important to take into account the model's involvement with the site.

Not to mention that many porn stars keep on talking about their "new site" and how good it will be. Most get lost in webmastering nightmare and don't even get to release a site; those who eventually do, usually don't have what it takes to keep it intersting and fail to keep on updating after the launch.

I agree the quality should be improved but this site has mantained an awesome update rate of 2 new photo galleries and 1-2 videos per week for the last two years. Plus a constantly updated blog, message board activity and so on. I am not a big fan of Sophie Dee but I've signed up several times to the site over this period because I knew lots of things would have happened since last time.

I wish more porn stars followed her example.

View Thread (2)

RE: atrapat's Review

Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:38:28 PDT

Club Sophie Dee (2)

08-05-08 09:38am

REVIEW REPLY by uscue (30)

To atrapat (48):

I would agree with this assessment. Definitely a good way to have a solo site for a individual model if the point is to not have hardcore videos. With someone with as much stuff as she's done, I would like for their to be a way to come to her site and download her scenes in one place without searching all over for them, but coming here for the blog and pictures is a good touch too. Different than the norm.

View Thread (2)

PU - Club Sophie Dee - All Activity

RE: atrapat's Review

RE: atrapat's Review