Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/fuckyoupaul/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_57966 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=57956#57966 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/fuckyoupaul/"> <img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/fuckyoupaul.jpg" alt="Enter Fuck You Paul" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/fuckyoupaul/"><b>Fuck You Paul</b></a> (1)<br> <br> 02-19-11 02:19am </td> <td><b>COMMENT REPLY</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=12274">BadMrFrosty</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=12274">42</a>)<br> <br> To <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=3579">artnoir</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=3579">17</a>):<br /><br /> Maybe I am completely missing the point of your comment, but are you criticizing this site because you can download all its content via torrents? I'm sorry but what the fuck? The complete works of Shakespeare are available on torrent sites, does that devalue his work? Just because you can CHOOSE to illegal download something should in no way reflect badly on the quality of that thing. If you don’t think the site is worth its membership fee, fine, but comparing the value of a site membership to the value of file sharing site membership is absolutely ridiculous. If everyone were to think like you, sites would have no members and thus produce no content for you to illegally download. I am not some anti-piracy whacko but the logic displayed in your post is way out of kilter. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=57956#57966"><b>View Thread</b></a> (1)</td> </tr> </table> <br> <br> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:19:19 PST