Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_5498 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5498 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dpbabes.jpg" alt="Enter DP Babes" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/"><b>DP Babes</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 06-30-07&nbsp;&nbsp;03:13pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=559">SnowDude</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=559">214</a>)<br> <br> <b>Contradiction In Terms?</b><br> <br> Ok, this is one really makes no sense to me. In the description for this one, which would have the full title of "Double <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/penetrationbabes/">Penetration Babes</a>", it is listed at being an amateur site (see my previous comments for my feeling on this one), but the more shocking descriptor is "Soft Content". What? How can a site where a girl lets two guys penetrate her at once possibly be soft?<br /> <br /> I gave it the benefit of the doubt figuring that someone may get off on something like that being implied and not shown, but even the tour shows the penetration without any little blurry spots to make it R rated as opposed to XXX. I understand the problem figuring out if a site is amateur, I really do. However, how can a site like this possibly be described as soft content? <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15250"><b>Visit DP Babes</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5498">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5498">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:13:33 PDT