<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - DP Babes - All Activity</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5516</guid>
		<title>RE: Contradiction In Terms?</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5498#5516</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dpbabes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter DP Babes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;DP Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-01-07 05:47am
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_staff.html?id=47&quot;&gt;RoseAnn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (Staff)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=559&quot;&gt;SnowDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=559&quot;&gt;214&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					Hi there SnowDude, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just wanted to get back to you on your comments about the categories.  Usually the categories are chosen when the sites are first added and without the ability to see a member area, so we do our best to put the sites into the most appropriate 3 category choices we can.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes we make technical mistakes in that process and inadvertently let the dropdown field for category selection land on an incorrect choice.  Obviously that's what may have happened in this on the 3rd category listing for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/&quot;&gt;DP Babes&lt;/a&gt;, as its definitely hardcore content.   The listing has been corrected now...thanks for the catch!
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5498#5516&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 05:47:34 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5514</guid>
		<title>RE: Contradiction In Terms?</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5498#5514</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dpbabes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter DP Babes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;DP Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-30-07 11:55pm
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;431&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=559&quot;&gt;SnowDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=559&quot;&gt;214&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					Hey SD, I sure hope those pretty models weren't paid for just &amp;quot;soft&amp;quot; sex ha ha! I can hear some old perverted guy now, &amp;quot;But this is softcore in 2007!&amp;quot;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5498#5514&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 23:55:27 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5498</guid>
		<title>DP Babes Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5498</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dpbabes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter DP Babes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dpbabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;DP Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-30-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:13pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=559&quot;&gt;SnowDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=559&quot;&gt;214&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Contradiction In Terms?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					Ok, this is one really makes no sense to me. In the description for this one, which would have the full title of &quot;Double &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/penetrationbabes/&quot;&gt;Penetration Babes&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, it is listed at being an amateur site (see my previous comments for my feeling on this one), but the more shocking descriptor is &quot;Soft Content&quot;. What? How can a site where a girl lets two guys penetrate her at once possibly be soft?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I gave it the benefit of the doubt figuring that someone may get off on something like that being implied and not shown, but even the tour shows the penetration without any little blurry spots to make it R rated as opposed to XXX. I understand the problem figuring out if a site is amateur, I really do. However, how can a site like this possibly be described as soft content?
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15250&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit DP Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5498&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5498&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:13:33 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
