<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Teen Stars Magazine - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/teenstarsmagazine/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_18958</guid>
		<title>Teen Stars Magazine Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18958</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/teenstarsmagazine/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/teenstarsmagazine.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Teen Stars Magazine&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/teenstarsmagazine/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Teen Stars Magazine&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-14-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:40pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;88&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Beautiful models&lt;br /&gt;
- Good to excellent picture quality&lt;br /&gt;
- Models are proffessional, or at least appear so to me, and are very good at what they do.&lt;br /&gt;
- Lots of material up.&lt;br /&gt;
- Zips for all pic sets.&lt;br /&gt;
- Very tasteful over-all.&lt;br /&gt;
- Ethel and Martine: practically worth the money just for these two beauties.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Site has not updated since mid 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
- Video quality is pretty bad, and there is no sound in any of the vids I downloaded.&lt;br /&gt;
- Vids come in one minute to minute and a half snippets, making them next to worthless.&lt;br /&gt;
- Several models stay fully clothed. Not even a kini or panty-shot from them. &lt;br /&gt;
- For the casual browser or for the guy who doesn't want entire sets, each pic opens in a new window, causing more work. All hail the back button.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I got Teen Stars and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/teencharms/&quot;&gt;Teen Charms&lt;/a&gt; in a two-fer deal for 29.99, but I've been busy with Teen Stars thus far to the exclusion of the other site, which I'll look at in the future. I want to say first off that these are some of the most beautiful girls going. If you have a thing for young-looking, skinny, leggy, drop-dead-gorgeous girls, this place is ace. It's neck &amp;amp; neck with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nubiles/&quot;&gt;Nubiles&lt;/a&gt; in that respect. But-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site is dead, and the video on offer is negligible, so what we have here is basically a large picture archive. If you're not a pic collector, and if you're not into softcore - at times extremely soft - then don't bother. I'm having a pretty good time because I'm a pic collector and the scarcity of tats, toys, penises, hair, and flab keeps all my neurons firing happily away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pics range from smallish, from 2003, to very large: 3500 on the big end. You don't get the kind of clarity you do with other places, and the emphasis on the portrait-format makes me wonder what the point of having a huge picture really is. Note to webmasters in this niche: landscape, landscape, landscape. While the site is mostly softcore with an artsy bent and a touch of glamour, plus cute in spades, there is some total nudity (pink), and toys, but not much.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't call the site a rip-off, but they should either downplay the presence of vids or offer better ones. Since the site is dead, maybe they should just remove the vids, lower the price, and continue as a good picture archive.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1504&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Teen Stars Magazine&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18958&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=18958&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:40:10 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
