Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/housewifeadventures/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_4495 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4495 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/housewifeadventures/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/housewifeadventures.jpg" alt="Enter Housewife Adventures" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/housewifeadventures/"><b>Housewife Adventures</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 06-03-07&nbsp;&nbsp;06:04pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=559">SnowDude</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=559">214</a>)<br> <br> <b>Are They Even Trying Anymore?</b><br> <br> As an ongoing rant, I never fail to be surprised at how thinly veiled sites are getting in regards to a theme. Maybe my memory suffers, but didn't they use to try to make us believe the scenarios just a little bit? The women on this site are clearly not housewives and I doubt highly they ever will be. They don't even change the names anymore!<br /> <br /> I don't know about anyone else, but a little bit of fantasy would be nice and since they have gotten so blatant with the lackthereof perhaps I'm in the minority. Admittedly there is a fine line between effective fantasy elements and an enormous cheese factor, so it isn't easy to do. However, could they at least try? If not, why even bother with the housewives theme? Why not just call it Pornstars Screwing Each Other?<br /> <br /> *sigh* <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15017"><b>Visit Housewife Adventures</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4495">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4495">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:04:43 PDT