Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/needapee/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_43194 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=43194 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/needapee/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/needapee.jpg" alt="Enter Need A Pee" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/needapee/"><b>Need A Pee</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 12-09-09&nbsp;&nbsp;11:55am</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=11370">greg909</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=11370">2</a>)<br> <br> <b>The Photosets</b><br> <br> Just having checked this site out, I found the photosets very disappointing, quality-wise. The preview page says "1200dpi x 1200 dpi" which is pretty meaningless. The images are actually about 1200x900 pixels, which fills about half my screen -- not exactly HD by today's standards! Furthermore, most pics are somewhat blurry (with false sharpening). Also note that of the small number of photosets (33), most are of the same model, called Rebekah. <br /> <br /> Actually, I preferred the videos here, and I'm not usually a video man, so that may say something. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=14975"><b>Visit Need A Pee</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=43194">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=43194">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:55:59 PST