PU - Glossy Angels - All Activity

RE: Exclusive? Hel-l-o-o-o-o!

Tue, 11 May 2010 14:11:30 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

05-11-10 02:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Sorry, but Markyta looks new to me. Maybe she'll start making the rounds and we'll all get "Markytafied."

Best Wishes and a Happy Markytafication! :-;

View Thread (7)

RE: Exclusive? Hel-l-o-o-o-o!

Tue, 11 May 2010 06:58:39 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

05-11-10 06:58am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

Drooler...any idea???

Talking about W4B - just grabbed some trailer kind of thing - which seems new - with a Markyta - a full (natural, I think) breasted beauty with bedroom eyes - never seen her before. Is she new - got one pix set at W4B and a video.
Have you - or anybody - seen her elsewhere???

View Thread (7)

RE: Exclusive? Hel-l-o-o-o-o!

Sun, 09 May 2010 15:07:26 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

05-09-10 03:07pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To PinkPanther (44):

Funny. Some time ago, before they had anything larger than, say, 3000 px photos, W4B had this line on their site THAT SAID that you could ask for up to 10 photos free at a super large size, or something like that. So I went through the collection and picked out 10 for myself, very carefully.

Emailed them.

A few days later I got a response to "be patient." They were going to increase the pic sizes on the site. A few months months later, they did.

They don't seem to be great communicators, but if we annoy them enough, we might get a peep out of them.

View Thread (7)

RE: Exclusive? Hel-l-o-o-o-o!

Sun, 09 May 2010 09:19:34 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

05-09-10 09:19am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

Right you are - like Danny Joe Brown (of Molly Hatchet) once said in a song: "Nobody walks on us"......who do they think we are...?

View Thread (7)

RE: Exclusive? Hel-l-o-o-o-o!

Sun, 09 May 2010 08:49:38 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

05-09-10 08:49am

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Drooler (218):

You received a response from someone that works for W4B? Frame it! I had a membership to their "Dreams" sites a couple of years ago and was trying to follow up on a deal that they had offered, then taken away - must have sent 30 e-mails with no response whatsoever.

They are on my list of 10 most non-responsive web sites in existence.

View Thread (7)

RE: Exclusive? Hel-l-o-o-o-o!

Sun, 09 May 2010 06:45:54 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

05-09-10 06:45am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Same here with the third parties. The first reply I ever got from a webmaster here was this guy from W4B. He didn't seem to like a comment I'd made, and he claimed that the material there was exclusive.

Bluudy well roigh' 'e wuz!

Huh-huh!

View Thread (7)

RE: Exclusive? Hel-l-o-o-o-o!

Sun, 09 May 2010 06:11:50 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

05-09-10 06:11am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

A little strange that TBP (still) says "exclusive" - we've had a comment/reply earlier about the content of this site - and it's exactly what Drooler mentions in relation to W4B....and this user has seen some of that material even at third parties..

View Thread (7)

Glossy Angels Comment

Sun, 09 May 2010 02:44:56 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

05-09-10 02:44am

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Exclusive? Hel-l-o-o-o-o!

In the TBP review just posted, it reads, "Glossy Angels offers up an all exclusive collection of Europe's hottest teens."

But a lot of the same content is at Watch4Beauty, so it's not exclusive.

Visit Glossy Angels - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Exclusive or What?

Fri, 29 May 2009 13:28:07 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

05-29-09 01:28pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Wittyguy (83):

I click "Instant Access" and then immediately noticed that it said it was for "Beauty and the Senior"! Glossy Angels and Crotchety Farts! Yikes! Wrong turn!

View Thread (1)

Glossy Angels Comment

Fri, 29 May 2009 13:03:38 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

05-29-09 01:03pm

COMMENT by Wittyguy (83)

Exclusive or What?

Drooler posted a comment on this about 2 years ago stating that this site is basically a clone of Watch4Beauty. As I've never joined either site I was wondering if this site was still nonexclusive content (the TBP review from '07 seems to think its exclusivee but we all know that they're not terribly up to speed on that stuff)? The picture quality looks real good, the models seem pretty hot and the TBP discount price isn't too bad so before I seriously consider joining I'd be interested to know.

Visit Glossy Angels - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Different from Watch4Beauty?

Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:31:34 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

09-03-07 02:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Agreed. A while back, the webmaster at W4B responded to some of my criticisms of that site and said that it was all exclusive with a small number of exceptions. To be fair, I don't believe that "Glossy Angels" was in existence at that time.

Still, what is going on? Who gave the go-ahead on Glossy Angels? It sure looks like a clone to me, kind of a "Mini-Me" to W4B, which I think is the better of the two since there are more image size options.

View Thread (4)

RE: Different from Watch4Beauty?

Mon, 03 Sep 2007 09:02:19 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

09-03-07 09:02am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

This site seems to deserve the mark "Clone".
When you watch the videos at preview they're absolutly the same as in W4B.

View Thread (4)

RE: Different from Watch4Beauty?

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 03:20:09 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

08-16-07 03:20am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To jd1961 (95):

Yes, indeed.

I've been a W4B member a few times and have scoured the entire site. Everything I see in the preview/visitor's pages of the site looks just like what I've seen at W4B.

View Thread (4)

RE: Different from Watch4Beauty?

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:00:09 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

08-15-07 07:00pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Drooler (218):

If you look on the 2nd or 3rd page there is a girl named "Mina" that is a set from W4B.

View Thread (4)

Glossy Angels Comment

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:35:59 PDT

Glossy Angels (0)

08-15-07 05:35pm

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Different from Watch4Beauty?

I've visited a few times, but the content looks much the same as on Watch4Beauty. One difference might be pic sizes (W4B offering larger sizes of at least some sets).

Could it be that they're different pics but from the same shoots? It's puzzling.

Visit Glossy Angels - View Replies - Add Reply