<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Upskirt Collection - All Activity</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/upskirtcollection/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_42918</guid>
		<title>RE: A bounty, to be sure, but...</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=42916#42918</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/upskirtcollection/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/upskirtcollection.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Upskirt Collection&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/upskirtcollection/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upskirt Collection&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-03-09 01:29pm
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=3264&quot;&gt;mr smut&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=3264&quot;&gt;40&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;88&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					All in all a questionable site? I do wonder too and of course the children's faces - at least this has to be done - need to be blurred. Shouldn't it be common sense to do so?
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=42916#42918&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:29:19 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_42916</guid>
		<title>Upskirt Collection Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=42916</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/upskirtcollection/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/upskirtcollection.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Upskirt Collection&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/upskirtcollection/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upskirt Collection&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-03-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:53pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;88&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;A bounty, to be sure, but...&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					Joined the trial and got a good return on my investment; however, it makes me wonder how a site can operate like this one, with pictures that are non-exclusive, and many of which are plucked from pic-hosting sites like Webshots. I've seen photos from all over Netville, a few with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/teenflood/&quot;&gt;Teen Flood&lt;/a&gt; watermark still intact, for example, under their own watermark. Maybe they buy up old sets or soemthing? I don't know how this all works.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main difficulty is this: these people need to remove children from their pics. MANY photos contain children, at beaches or pools, and they are not blurred or masked at all. One photo that needs mention is of a very-obviously under-age girl without a top in one of their topless beach sets. This is stupid practice and I'm surprised to see it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every candid-photo board I've ever frequented sternly reminds their posters not to upload pics with children in them, even if they are street candids or whatever.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=14762&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Upskirt Collection&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=42916&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=42916&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:53:37 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_34075</guid>
		<title>RE: interesting site</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=30960#34075</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/upskirtcollection/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/upskirtcollection.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Upskirt Collection&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/upskirtcollection/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upskirt Collection&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-20-09 09:55am
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=6948&quot;&gt;Shonny&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=6948&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;344&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					i was a member of this site about 3 monthes ago... it's full of upskirt and other voyeur and fetish stuff&lt;br /&gt;
Right, it's a little bit hard to navigate inside ,cause too many sections , too many content.. How i can see now - it was redesigned and updated.. PHOTOS: 64981  VIDEOS: 1281 - crazy amount..  That's really worth too pay if you don't need to communicate with other members, cause they don't have forum inside that's why i canceled after 2 monthes of membership :(&lt;br /&gt;
Do anybody knows does they added exclusive upskirt content and how much?
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=30960#34075&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:55:44 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_30960</guid>
		<title>Upskirt Collection Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=30960</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/upskirtcollection/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/upskirtcollection.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Upskirt Collection&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/upskirtcollection/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upskirt Collection&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-07-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:21pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;344&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;interesting site&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					Has anyone been a member and can tell me if the site is worth joining? Does anyone know if the three day trial is full access?
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=14762&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Upskirt Collection&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=30960&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=30960&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:21:21 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
