<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Teen Slam - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/teenslam/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_41659</guid>
		<title>Teen Slam Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41659</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/teenslam/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/teenslam.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Teen Slam&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/teenslam/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Teen Slam&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-30-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:11pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=7834&quot;&gt;dracken&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=7834&quot;&gt;213&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-39 scenes in rather poor quality 452x300 . Most of which don't have full download options (available only as clips) On a few of the more recent videos WMV and MPG are offered. I'd have preferred MP4 but that's just me...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- each scene has a few screen caps at around 480px × 640px. No zipped archive and not really worth saving IMO. The images are blurry and don't even come close to the quality available in many other places. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/teendreams/&quot;&gt;Teen Dreams&lt;/a&gt; comes to mind as a good place for teen hardcore photos.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- a lot of new faces (I didn't really recognize any of the models and I browse most of the young adult networks) and mostly relatively cute girls. Some act more shy than others and some are cutter than others, with a lot of girls I didn't care for (but that's subjective). All and all a decent mix. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- some of the more recent videos have trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- access to the whole meat members network which has around 54 sites and hundreds of scenes. The site is very well integrated in the network.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- last video is from 06.2009 but before that the last video is from 2007. A huge gap....also I am not sure if further updates will be available&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- no way to search only inside the site. Say if you want to see anal within the Teen Slam site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- no model pages&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- streaming claims it requires windows media player 11 I had it installed and firefox still wouldn't stream. Didn't have this problem elsewhere. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- download speeds aren't the best I've ever seen. It capped at around 50-70kb.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					All and all this site has/had potential. There are some really cute girls in here, although they can be a bit hard to find among the less good looking ones, a better preview system would have worked wonders. Most previews are just a shot of the girl with a penis in her mouth, the penis obscuring half the image due to the angle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyhow, the main problem is not bad previews but the fact that this site was probably abandoned in late 2007, for a while updates were regular (back in 2007), then they stop. Only to have that last video from 2009...does this mean that the updates will start back up? maybe, maybe not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 2007 standards the site is good, but compared to other networks, it lacks. When places like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/facialabuse/&quot;&gt;Facial Abuse&lt;/a&gt; offer HD videos and this place has mostly scenes cut up in clips of 1 minute each there isn't really any fair compassion. &lt;br /&gt;
When sites offer high def photos and Teen Slam tries to compete by offering screen caps...nope, won't do. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line. A lot of potential, a decent amount of cute teens doing hardcore, not enough dedication by the webmaster. The site is mediocre and if there is something else in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/meatmembers/&quot;&gt;Meat Members&lt;/a&gt; network that you like consider this site as well, but Teen Slam is not a deal maker or breaker. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Gave it 70 because I really liked one or two of their models, but if it weren't for that, this site is not worth it.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However this site will also get you access to the whole &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/meatmembers/&quot;&gt;Meat Members&lt;/a&gt; network which boasts 57 Sites&lt;br /&gt;
29123 scenes, 8000 Bonus DVD's and 374864 Photos!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now keep in mind that the bonus DVD's are only for streaming and that some of the scenes are actually low quality stuff that you will probably not be interested in. However, this is not a bad deal, especially if you're into rough sex with a lot of anal. The whole network seems to slowly move in that direction.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1467&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Teen Slam&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41659&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=41659&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:11:19 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
