<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Fetish Network - All Activity</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/fetishnetworkcom/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_33029</guid>
		<title>RE: Jay G's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=32877#33029</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/fetishnetworkcom/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/fetishnetworkcom.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Fetish Network&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/fetishnetworkcom/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fetish Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-25-09 04:10am
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=300&quot;&gt;Jay G&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=300&quot;&gt;63&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=5603&quot;&gt;TheSquirrel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=5603&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					For quality, Kink.com is heads and shoulders above the rest, except for their desire to often set their scenes in dingy dungeons (but that's part of their Kink). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/fetishnetworkcom/&quot;&gt;Fetish Network&lt;/a&gt; really seems to be a collection of separate and mostly small websites that include many &amp;quot;one man operations&amp;quot; from all over the world (Germany &amp;amp; Japan are well represented) and old spanking and fetish films transferred to video (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/purespanking/&quot;&gt;Pure Spanking&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/perfectspanking/&quot;&gt;Perfect Spanking&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elite spanking seems to be a collection of used video from Germany's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/spankingserver/&quot;&gt;Spanking Server&lt;/a&gt; site and is, at least, has better lighting than the many dark spanking sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The old stuff with poorer quality does give me the nostalgic thrill, however, of when I first saw kinky videos a few decades ago and they were like a naughty and forbidden peek into something very private and personal.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=32877#33029&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:10:44 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_33022</guid>
		<title>RE: Jay G's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=32877#33022</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/fetishnetworkcom/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/fetishnetworkcom.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Fetish Network&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/fetishnetworkcom/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fetish Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-24-09 09:03pm
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=5603&quot;&gt;TheSquirrel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=5603&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=300&quot;&gt;Jay G&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=300&quot;&gt;63&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					I had been thinking about maybe joining, but from reading your review, there doesn't appear to be too much quality here, even though there seems to be quantity. I'm not crazy about the quality of vids from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realspankings/&quot;&gt;RealSpankings&lt;/a&gt; either. In fact fetish material in general seems to be a little behind the rest in picture quality.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=32877#33022&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:03:36 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
