<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Sneaky Peeks - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/sneakypeeks/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_7691</guid>
		<title>Sneaky Peeks Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7691</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/sneakypeeks/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/sneakypeeks.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Sneaky Peeks&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/sneakypeeks/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sneaky Peeks&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-01-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:58pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 74&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;70&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Nifty idea.&lt;br /&gt;
- Zip files for pics, which is the only way to go with these kind of pics.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos are of good quality.&lt;br /&gt;
- Updated regularly.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Small amount of content for the price.&lt;br /&gt;
- Vids stick to the core idea but are repetitive and tend to be boring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- BACK OF SOME GUY'S HEAD IN A LOT OF THE PICS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Minimal acting and/or improvisational skills.&lt;br /&gt;
- Some REALLY bad boob-jobs.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I enjoyed two of this company's other sites, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantymaniacs/&quot;&gt;Panty Maniacs&lt;/a&gt; and Panty Amateurs, and so I thought I'd give this a try. It's not nearly as good as those other sites, but it has potential. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The picture sets are shot in a frame-by-frame style which unfortunately means most of the pics are redundant. They have the look and feel of high-quality vid-caps. Only voyeur and/or panty afficianados need apply. There is some nudity but not much. And too many implants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone had the &amp;quot;brilliant&amp;quot; idea of placing some guy's noggin in many of the photos, which is supposed to enhance the voyeuristic feel of the sets. This is a gigantically BAD idea. Since when did peeping become a team sport? I don't want to look over another guy's shoulder to get a glimpse of some cutie in her unmentionables, nor do I wish to have said unmentionables obscured by a large male cranium which always makes me think of Shaun of the Dead. Tell Shaun to take a hike and I'll hold the cyber door open, thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the vids: the quality is very good and looks decent full-screen on my 22 inch monitor. But, I wish these girls would have something to do in the bathroom rather than stand around gazing into the mirror or off into space. I don't mean watersports or anything like that, I mean, give them a task. Let them do something. Most of the time the girls look bored and are overly conscious of the camera. I wind up embarrassed for THEM when I'm supposed to be ashamed of MYSELF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some good fun here regardless.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=14172&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Sneaky Peeks&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7691&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=7691&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:58:17 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>