PU - Met Models - All Activity

RE: dvds and cds

Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:17:23 PST

Met Models (3)

11-26-08 03:17pm

COMMENT REPLY by hondaman (7)

To mbaya (78):

Good question. I notice that both Met-Art and Metmodels sell the DVDs(as do many other sites) and I have wondered a few times myself if they are good or are they just a dvd with all the photosets on them in which case you can just download them for free from the site and that thought/concern has kept me away.

View Thread (1)

RE: No 2-day trial

Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:10:58 PST

Met Models (3)

11-25-08 11:10am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To roadie (6):

Ok, I've passed that over to the editors. With it being that convoluted to get to the trial, we'll see if they feel it's safe to list it w/out the in-depth instructions that finding it seems to require.

But thanks for pointing it out to us.

View Thread (6)

RE: No 2-day trial

Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:46:27 PST

Met Models (3)

11-24-08 03:46pm

COMMENT REPLY by roadie (6)

To jd1961 (82):

How I got to the 2 day trial.

From the MET ART home page http://www.met-art.com/ select the sign up tab at the top of the page. Taking you to the following page http://signup.met-art.com/full.htm at the bottom of the page click on �click here to purchase our combo membership, up to 3 MET sites at a lower rate�. Takes you to this page
http://signup.met-art.com/combo.htm
Tick the box for MET models only and do not make a combo selection. Click submit and the options include a 2 day trial for $6.99.

View Thread (6)

RE: No 2-day trial

Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:58:01 PST

Met Models (3)

11-24-08 06:58am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To roadie (6):

The TBP Editors looked at this and are not seeing a way to get to that trial page from the TBP link OR the root domain of Met-Art. If we (and our users) can't get to the page, we can't list that price or that trial.

So, if you want to write us and tell us how you got to the URL you listed, we'll be happy to take another look.

View Thread (6)

RE: No 2-day trial

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:48:46 PST

Met Models (3)

11-23-08 03:48pm

COMMENT REPLY by roadie (6)

To Khan (Staff):

The trial is still available. Go to the combination option on the sign up page but only tick the box for MET Models. You get a 2 day trial option.
http://signup.metmodels.com/mm_trial.htm?

View Thread (6)

Met Models Comment

Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:32:12 PST

Met Models (3)

11-15-08 10:32am

COMMENT by mbaya (78)

dvds and cds

I see the site sells both dvds and cds. Has anyone seen them? Are they worth buying?

Visit Met Models - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: jd1961's Review

Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:48:21 PST

Met Models (3)

11-14-08 02:48pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (6)

To jd1961 (82):

I believe the reason met-art removed some "Lolita" sets was for legal reasons.
The main photographer for met-art in its early days was Grigori Galitsin. He also provided pictures to Domai.
Later, Galitsin worked with Petter Hegre to set up an erotic website, and then Galitsin set up his own erotic websites.
Galtsin has had legal problems in recent years. In 2006 Galitsin was put in jail in Russia for his erotic photography.
His wife was also arrested and put in jail in 2006, released, then put in jail again. His wife was the model named Valentina at met-art and named Val at Domai.
Her photosets have all been pulled at met-art and Domai.
As far as I know, Galitsin is still in jail in Russia.

View Thread (1)

RE: No 2-day trial

Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:35:47 PDT

Met Models (3)

10-29-07 08:35am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Denner (146):

The TBP Editors have now changed the listing.

Thanks for the heads up.

View Thread (6)

RE: No 2-day trial

Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:40:00 PDT

Met Models (3)

10-28-07 10:40pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (82)

To Denner (146):

It's still gone

View Thread (6)

RE: Drooler's Review

Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:47:14 PDT

Met Models (3)

09-27-07 11:47am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (156)

To jd1961 (82):

Well, guess what. Today for the first time I saw a set on MetModels that had already appeared on MetArt, of the thin blond Olga, "Svelte," on MetModels.

I'd picked it up Nov. or Dec. last year from MetArt as Olga R, "Presenting." Same model, same pics.

So I've paid for it twice. How nice!

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:18:20 PDT

Met Models (3)

09-22-07 03:18am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (156)

To Denner (146):

A photo phreak indeed I am. 2nd for me is hot hardcore video, but I'm really picky about the quality and the action. BTW, since you're into videos and I think HC, you might want to check out 1000facials, which is actually part of a network of several sites. I was a member early this year and have occasionally lurked around the newer updates areas.

It's got a $30 price tag and is one of those signups for mostly the existing (but exclusive) content since the updates are a tad slow (for me to get what I'm after, at least). And if you go back far enough in their archives the quality suffers, but it still might be of interest to you, especially with the dollar now at an all-time low against the Euro. The action is hot, and some of the girls are great, too, like Lela Star and Riley Shy.

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:38:22 PDT

Met Models (3)

09-21-07 07:38am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (146)

To Drooler (156):

Certainly agree with your point about the videos...
A solo-model need to act - and not just lying around - even looking bored.
How do otherwise professional (it seems) people from these sites except the customer to not getting bored as well.
I have that feeling about both Hegre Art and Met...
And compared to my favorite at the moment Pier 999 this other stuff is not worth paying for....
But ok, some of the photos in the two sites mentioned are very nice, and your formost a photo-freak, are you not?

By the way this PU keeps getting better and better - AND take up more and more browsing-time.....

View Thread (8)

Met Models Comment

Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:14:50 PDT

Met Models (3)

09-21-07 07:14am

COMMENT by Denner (146)

No 2-day trial

Tried to sign up for a $6.99 trial via TBP.

But that option seems to be gone.

Visit Met Models - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Drooler's Review

Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:17:31 PDT

Met Models (3)

09-21-07 03:17am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (82)

To Drooler (156):

Believe it or not, I have been waiting for your answer, so thanks for responding! I was hoping that this site would be more on the erotic side, but i guess not. I have DVD's full of Met-Art material, so I guess I'll pass on this.

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:41:36 PDT

Met Models (3)

09-20-07 07:41am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (156)

To Denner (146):

Hey Denner,
I just responded to jd1961's question about the photo content. Went at length, but the summary statement is, "Yes, the content is exclusive to MetModels."

As for the videos, they are boring. I've thought about this, having recently sampled some of the stuff at Hegre-Art, too, for my review of it.

Get a pair of people together and they can keep each other occupied, but a single model, along with the director, has to work out ways to keep the video interesting. Just lying around and turning this way and that, staring into space, etc. is boring!!! I've seen very few models who can maintain the turn-on. I must say that Evelyn Lory at her own site is a rare exception; she really does it for me. Helps that her ass is so worthy of devotion and zeal.

Anwyay, I think that a lot of effects like superimposing two stretches of video, transitions, and tight editing are done as a poor substitute for "continuous heat conduction."

To make me happy, the model has to be "videogenic," to coin a term (?) and do POV simulated sex, and the camera has to stay at the right places for good lengths of time. Most softcore solo vids never do such things; they jump around so much that it seems as if they're only good for inducing ADD -- if not ED. So for me at least, they've usually been a waste of time.

Good to hear from you. Hope this wasn't too long.

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:22:18 PDT

Met Models (3)

09-20-07 07:22am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (156)

To jd1961 (82):

Wow, first my apologies for not answering this for over 2 months. I did say "exclusive" in the review, and exclusive it is. Some of the models and photographers are the same in both MetArt and MetModels, but there is no duplication of content.

I guess there's some difference (but also a good amount of similarity) between the photo content of the two sites. Hard to put my finger on it. There's more of the photographer Magoo on MetModels, it seems. He doctors up a lot of photos to an extent where the model has this unearthly sheen to her skin. He's done it to Cayenne and Adrienn (sp?) aka Laura at ATK Galleria/Kelly at Nubiles, for instance. Makes me think of Mr. Magoo, blindly going through life, wreaking havoc on the world with his misplaced notions.

Anyway, the archive volume is huge. You're a photo fan, if I remember right. If you like Met-Art, the collection at MetModels should keep you busy. You could try the $6.99, full access trial if that's still on, but it's only for 2 days.

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:38:07 PDT

Met Models (3)

09-20-07 06:38am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (146)

To Drooler (156):

I second that (jd1961): Good review and the question of centent compared to the motherload at MET ART.
I had some serious problems with the boredom of the videos - is the style the same here?

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:27:50 PDT

Met Models (3)

07-02-07 07:27pm

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (82)

To Drooler (156):

How is this site different from the main site Drooler? Are they using the same photo sets? Are the photos of a different style? Thanks, good review!

View Thread (8)