PU - Erotic Beauty - All Activity

RE: Name change?

Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:17:01 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

01-26-12 03:17pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To tangub (103):

" I think most people had the impression that it was just the smaller inferior sister site of Met Art where they dumped the content that didn't make the grade to be showcased on Met Art. "

...but isn't that really essentially what it is?

Even if the site is wearing smarter clothes! :0S

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (2)

RE: Name change?

Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:41:25 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

01-26-12 03:41am

COMMENT REPLY by tangub (103)

To RLane (2):

I think the revamp and renaming of the site is an attempt to give the site its own individual identity. Under the name Met Models I think most people had the impression that it was just the smaller inferior sister site of Met Art where they dumped the content that didn't make the grade to be showcased on Met Art.

From the tour it looks like they are using the exact same site layout i've just encountered at the other Met sister site The Life Erotic which is a big improvement as they have addressed some of the cons i mentioned in my review of last year such as the lack of a decent model index. I also notice from the tour that they have doubled the update rate to 2 per day from 19th January so i guess that would be their justification for the price increase.

View Thread (2)

Erotic Beauty Comment

Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:29:47 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

01-26-12 12:29am

COMMENT by RLane (2)

Name change?

Did they get a new buyer and is that why they changed it? How much different is it from the past look? I'm not happy with the change, for the price isn't $14.99 anymore.

Visit Erotic Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Updating

Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:55:04 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

12-12-11 08:55pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To RLane (2):

Click on "Free Tour" and it shows you that it updates once a day.

View Thread (1)

Erotic Beauty Comment

Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:05:54 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

12-11-11 02:05pm

COMMENT by RLane (2)

Updating

How much do they update in a month? I want to know because it's been a bout a year since I last joined them.

Visit Erotic Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: tangub's Review

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:00:48 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

03-10-11 09:00am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To tangub (103):

I thought as much.

Thanks for the additional information anyway!

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (5)

RE: tangub's Review

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:55:45 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

03-10-11 08:55am

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (103)

To Capn (27):

You're right Capn, there's not much in the way of full striptease from fully clothed to naked. Often when a model starts clothed or partially clothed she might be wearing a dress or a skirt and shirt and you'll find she's wearing no lingerie beneath so she'll just go from clothed to naked without any long tease but in many of the sets they only start with lingerie or often only a pair of stockings and nothing else.

View Thread (5)

RE: tangub's Review

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:12:51 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

03-10-11 07:12am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To tangub (103):

Interesting review.
A shame about this regional pricing issue coming up again.
A very odd situation.
Why request regional pricing & then bypass it immediately someone complains?

I take it there is little in the way of stripping content?
It looks as if it is mainly nude, glam wear or lingerie?

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (5)

RE: tangub's Review

Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:33:02 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

03-09-11 06:33am

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (103)

To lk2fireone (116):

Thanks for the appreciation lk2

View Thread (5)

RE: tangub's Review

Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:29:30 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

03-09-11 06:29am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To tangub (103):

As usual, a detailed, informative review. As well as having an easily readable style. Two thumbs up.

View Thread (5)

Erotic Beauty Comment

Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:17:48 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

12-03-10 11:17am

COMMENT by gregdd (0)

First Class Ass

Damn fine site! You could write a book on the amazing variety of erotic beauty on this site and how well it's presented through the images and videos available. Classy and professional -- something you rarely find with today's porn sites.

Visit Erotic Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: nutcrackr's Review

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:00:45 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

08-22-09 01:00pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To Drooler (218):

With the popularity of the main site and the marketing efforts they continue to employ, All these guys need to do is to clean up their navigation and naming conventions.

I'm ready to volunteer to do the naming project.

View Thread (4)

RE: nutcrackr's Review

Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:06:48 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

06-06-09 02:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To nutcrackr (8):

I've noticed those inconsistencies, too, in the database and just generally in the naming of the models. Whenever I see someone first on MetArt or on MetModels and then she shows up on the other site, I always look for the name in my own "database" file system. Sometimes it's easy, and sometimes it's a pain if I'm sure I've gotten pics of the model before but not with the name shown at the time.

The editing mistakes might be due to using pages and code from one set to another, where they don't double check everything that needs to be changed before they post a new set. I've seen worse, but it's still a problem, of course.

View Thread (4)

RE: nutcrackr's Review

Sat, 06 Jun 2009 11:44:21 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

06-06-09 11:44am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To nutcrackr (8):

Review has lots of nice details. If money is no object, then belonging to both met-art and metmodels would be nice. Because then you would get to see all the sets at both sites. But since money is limited for most of us, met-art is the better value. The quality and style (teen glamour) of both sites is basically the same. The main difference is that met-art has a huge amount of content compared to metmodels.

View Thread (4)

RE: nutcrackr's Review

Sat, 06 Jun 2009 10:46:09 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

06-06-09 10:46am

REVIEW REPLY by zzzins (11)

To nutcrackr (8):

Nicely informative. I'm a big fan of Met-Art and always wondered what extra Met Models had to offer.

View Thread (4)

RE: It's no MET Art...

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:37:44 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

01-10-09 05:37am

COMMENT REPLY by TalonIcefire (6)

To jd1961 (95):

Nope. I saw models with two different names on MET Art and again the same models with completely different names on MET Models.

View Thread (2)

RE: It's no MET Art...

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:47:29 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

01-10-09 01:47am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To TalonIcefire (6):

So they still haven't figured out their own models' names yet?

View Thread (2)

Erotic Beauty Comment

Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:47:19 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

01-09-09 03:47pm

COMMENT by TalonIcefire (6)

It's no MET Art...

MET Models sells itself as the highlights or special emphasis of MET Art. While the photo sets are good, the model naming convention and site navigation leave much to be desired. Available download content is a lot lower than MET Art, which may be good or bad depending on your focus. Overall, I will be returning in 6 months for site updates.

Visit Erotic Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: dvds and cds

Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:17:23 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

11-26-08 03:17pm

COMMENT REPLY by hondaman (7)

To mbaya (344):

Good question. I notice that both Met-Art and Metmodels sell the DVDs(as do many other sites) and I have wondered a few times myself if they are good or are they just a dvd with all the photosets on them in which case you can just download them for free from the site and that thought/concern has kept me away.

View Thread (1)

RE: No 2-day trial

Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:10:58 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

11-25-08 11:10am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To roadie (11):

Ok, I've passed that over to the editors. With it being that convoluted to get to the trial, we'll see if they feel it's safe to list it w/out the in-depth instructions that finding it seems to require.

But thanks for pointing it out to us.

View Thread (6)

RE: No 2-day trial

Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:46:27 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

11-24-08 03:46pm

COMMENT REPLY by roadie (11)

To jd1961 (95):

How I got to the 2 day trial.

From the MET ART home page http://www.met-art.com/ select the sign up tab at the top of the page. Taking you to the following page http://signup.met-art.com/full.htm at the bottom of the page click on �click here to purchase our combo membership, up to 3 MET sites at a lower rate�. Takes you to this page
http://signup.met-art.com/combo.htm
Tick the box for MET models only and do not make a combo selection. Click submit and the options include a 2 day trial for $6.99.

View Thread (6)

RE: No 2-day trial

Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:58:01 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

11-24-08 06:58am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To roadie (11):

The TBP Editors looked at this and are not seeing a way to get to that trial page from the TBP link OR the root domain of Met-Art. If we (and our users) can't get to the page, we can't list that price or that trial.

So, if you want to write us and tell us how you got to the URL you listed, we'll be happy to take another look.

View Thread (6)

RE: No 2-day trial

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:48:46 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

11-23-08 03:48pm

COMMENT REPLY by roadie (11)

To Khan (Staff):

The trial is still available. Go to the combination option on the sign up page but only tick the box for MET Models. You get a 2 day trial option.
http://signup.metmodels.com/mm_trial.htm?

View Thread (6)

Erotic Beauty Comment

Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:32:12 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

11-15-08 10:32am

COMMENT by mbaya (344)

dvds and cds

I see the site sells both dvds and cds. Has anyone seen them? Are they worth buying?

Visit Erotic Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: jd1961's Review

Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:48:21 PST

Erotic Beauty (1)

11-14-08 02:48pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To jd1961 (95):

I believe the reason met-art removed some "Lolita" sets was for legal reasons.
The main photographer for met-art in its early days was Grigori Galitsin. He also provided pictures to Domai.
Later, Galitsin worked with Petter Hegre to set up an erotic website, and then Galitsin set up his own erotic websites.
Galtsin has had legal problems in recent years. In 2006 Galitsin was put in jail in Russia for his erotic photography.
His wife was also arrested and put in jail in 2006, released, then put in jail again. His wife was the model named Valentina at met-art and named Val at Domai.
Her photosets have all been pulled at met-art and Domai.
As far as I know, Galitsin is still in jail in Russia.

View Thread (1)

RE: No 2-day trial

Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:35:47 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

10-29-07 08:35am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Denner (227):

The TBP Editors have now changed the listing.

Thanks for the heads up.

View Thread (6)

RE: No 2-day trial

Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:40:00 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

10-28-07 10:40pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Denner (227):

It's still gone

View Thread (6)

RE: Drooler's Review

Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:47:14 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

09-27-07 11:47am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To jd1961 (95):

Well, guess what. Today for the first time I saw a set on MetModels that had already appeared on MetArt, of the thin blond Olga, "Svelte," on MetModels.

I'd picked it up Nov. or Dec. last year from MetArt as Olga R, "Presenting." Same model, same pics.

So I've paid for it twice. How nice!

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:18:20 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

09-22-07 03:18am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

A photo phreak indeed I am. 2nd for me is hot hardcore video, but I'm really picky about the quality and the action. BTW, since you're into videos and I think HC, you might want to check out 1000facials, which is actually part of a network of several sites. I was a member early this year and have occasionally lurked around the newer updates areas.

It's got a $30 price tag and is one of those signups for mostly the existing (but exclusive) content since the updates are a tad slow (for me to get what I'm after, at least). And if you go back far enough in their archives the quality suffers, but it still might be of interest to you, especially with the dollar now at an all-time low against the Euro. The action is hot, and some of the girls are great, too, like Lela Star and Riley Shy.

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:38:22 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

09-21-07 07:38am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

Certainly agree with your point about the videos...
A solo-model need to act - and not just lying around - even looking bored.
How do otherwise professional (it seems) people from these sites except the customer to not getting bored as well.
I have that feeling about both Hegre Art and Met...
And compared to my favorite at the moment Pier 999 this other stuff is not worth paying for....
But ok, some of the photos in the two sites mentioned are very nice, and your formost a photo-freak, are you not?

By the way this PU keeps getting better and better - AND take up more and more browsing-time.....

View Thread (8)

Erotic Beauty Comment

Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:14:50 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

09-21-07 07:14am

COMMENT by Denner (227)

No 2-day trial

Tried to sign up for a $6.99 trial via TBP.

But that option seems to be gone.

Visit Erotic Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Drooler's Review

Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:17:31 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

09-21-07 03:17am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Drooler (218):

Believe it or not, I have been waiting for your answer, so thanks for responding! I was hoping that this site would be more on the erotic side, but i guess not. I have DVD's full of Met-Art material, so I guess I'll pass on this.

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:41:36 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

09-20-07 07:41am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Hey Denner,
I just responded to jd1961's question about the photo content. Went at length, but the summary statement is, "Yes, the content is exclusive to MetModels."

As for the videos, they are boring. I've thought about this, having recently sampled some of the stuff at Hegre-Art, too, for my review of it.

Get a pair of people together and they can keep each other occupied, but a single model, along with the director, has to work out ways to keep the video interesting. Just lying around and turning this way and that, staring into space, etc. is boring!!! I've seen very few models who can maintain the turn-on. I must say that Evelyn Lory at her own site is a rare exception; she really does it for me. Helps that her ass is so worthy of devotion and zeal.

Anwyay, I think that a lot of effects like superimposing two stretches of video, transitions, and tight editing are done as a poor substitute for "continuous heat conduction."

To make me happy, the model has to be "videogenic," to coin a term (?) and do POV simulated sex, and the camera has to stay at the right places for good lengths of time. Most softcore solo vids never do such things; they jump around so much that it seems as if they're only good for inducing ADD -- if not ED. So for me at least, they've usually been a waste of time.

Good to hear from you. Hope this wasn't too long.

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:22:18 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

09-20-07 07:22am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To jd1961 (95):

Wow, first my apologies for not answering this for over 2 months. I did say "exclusive" in the review, and exclusive it is. Some of the models and photographers are the same in both MetArt and MetModels, but there is no duplication of content.

I guess there's some difference (but also a good amount of similarity) between the photo content of the two sites. Hard to put my finger on it. There's more of the photographer Magoo on MetModels, it seems. He doctors up a lot of photos to an extent where the model has this unearthly sheen to her skin. He's done it to Cayenne and Adrienn (sp?) aka Laura at ATK Galleria/Kelly at Nubiles, for instance. Makes me think of Mr. Magoo, blindly going through life, wreaking havoc on the world with his misplaced notions.

Anyway, the archive volume is huge. You're a photo fan, if I remember right. If you like Met-Art, the collection at MetModels should keep you busy. You could try the $6.99, full access trial if that's still on, but it's only for 2 days.

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:38:07 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

09-20-07 06:38am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

I second that (jd1961): Good review and the question of centent compared to the motherload at MET ART.
I had some serious problems with the boredom of the videos - is the style the same here?

View Thread (8)

RE: Drooler's Review

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:27:50 PDT

Erotic Beauty (1)

07-02-07 07:27pm

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Drooler (218):

How is this site different from the main site Drooler? Are they using the same photo sets? Are the photos of a different style? Thanks, good review!

View Thread (8)