<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Special Exercises - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/specialexercises/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_9831</guid>
		<title>Special Exercises Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9831</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/specialexercises/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/specialexercises.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Special Exercises&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/specialexercises/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Special Exercises&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-06-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:21pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2845&quot;&gt;KodiakCS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2845&quot;&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					All originial content&lt;br /&gt;
Some nice (if rather skinny) eurogirls&lt;br /&gt;
Unique idea&lt;br /&gt;
At this time the site seems to update rather regularily (once in a week)&lt;br /&gt;
OK video quality
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Boring scenes&lt;br /&gt;
No &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; bondage&lt;br /&gt;
Softcore (almost no sex)&lt;br /&gt;
Nudity does not focus on erotic views&lt;br /&gt;
Low production value (bad lighting, bad camera-angels)&lt;br /&gt;
Poor site design (no browsing)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I'd say: great idea - lousy realization...&lt;br /&gt;
The site contains around 45 scenes (with photos of about 25 of the older ones in the preview area) of &amp;quot;forced&amp;quot; - nude - exercises.&lt;br /&gt;
The scenes are very softcore and the force or bondage level is very low as is the exercise/stress level (where is the sweat, girls?).&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the girls are hot (many are average) but you won't see much... the level of nudity is low and open legs are an exception...&lt;br /&gt;
In addition the camerawork is lacking skill and focus: you could at least try to put the girls in focus and try to catch a glimpse of their sexuality (so that at least the voyeuristic part of the viewer is satisfied).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bottom line:&lt;br /&gt;
There is much work to do before this site gets interesting for the crowd! At this time it seems to be more an experiment with a special fetish than a sexy site.&lt;br /&gt;
At least there are regular updates - and the producers are honest and let you comment on any photo/videoshoot (boring is a word you'll often read there).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13713&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Special Exercises&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9831&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=9831&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:21:22 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>