<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Flashy Babes - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_25220</guid>
		<title>Flashy Babes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=25220</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/flashybabes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Flashy Babes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Flashy Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-02-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:49pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 51&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5277&quot;&gt;impuls&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5277&quot;&gt;5&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- UFC ring girl, &amp;quot;Edith Labelle&amp;quot; listed as Anabelle&lt;br /&gt;
- High quality pictures
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Very difficult to download pictures (or impossible if you don't know how)&lt;br /&gt;
- Not hardcore&lt;br /&gt;
- Not all models go fully nude (UFC ring girl, being one of them)&lt;br /&gt;
- Too many behind the scenes videos &lt;br /&gt;
- Slow download speeds with download manager&lt;br /&gt;
- Can't pause or resume with downloads
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					It is very difficult to download the pictures. If you click on one of them, it pops-up with that picture enlarged, and you can't right click &amp;quot;Save image as&amp;quot;. The only way to download these pictures efficiently is with an add-on for your browser (such as FlashGot or DownThemAll for Firefox), which would allow you to right click and download all the high quality pictures from the respective thumbnailed links. Even if that is acceptable, the pictures are broken up into 5-10 pages. They have gone out of their way to make this site very useless. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line, stick with Playboy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Update 10-03-08:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I double checked this page, you can right click and save image as. However you can't do it at the top of the image because javascript pops up with Next and Previous buttons. That wasn't very obvious, however, my mistake. Also you can &amp;quot;Save Link As&amp;quot; for the images.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some picture dimensions I downloaded: 950x633 800x1200, one landscape one portrait respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, there are 88 models on this site. Ranges from about 3-8 sets per model.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13584&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Flashy Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=25220&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=25220&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:49:10 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23232</guid>
		<title>Flashy Babes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23232</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/flashybabes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Flashy Babes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Flashy Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-09-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:30pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;301&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Models feature some of the best known in the business, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/sunnyleone/&quot;&gt;Sunny Leone&lt;/a&gt;, for example, to those unknowns that you wish you knew of! &lt;br /&gt;
- Has bonus access to 2 sites &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cherrypetite/&quot;&gt;Cherry Petite&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/squirt4real/&quot;&gt;Squirt 4 Real&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- Price is okay for one month join, would prefer to see $19.95 though&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos are 720 high end, bitrates need to improve only 1000&lt;br /&gt;
- Covers the different styles of porn from the very softcore to very hardcore on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/squirt4real/&quot;&gt;Squirt 4 Real&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- DL speeds about average.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No zips, I should list that 3 times, maybe the zips would then appear like Candyman? &lt;br /&gt;
- Video bitrate of 1000 really is slow when running at 720 resolution. &lt;br /&gt;
- The only word I can think of is that the site is somewhat boring. I didn't go back for nearly 2 weeks after my first day of joining. &lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation can be annoying, open pictures in new window, close site on accident type annoying. &lt;br /&gt;
- The best looking models are either topless at best or not nude at all in underwear.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I couldn't help but laugh when on this site. The site looks very professional, but I thought to myself, &amp;quot;That professional look is to tease me so that I will accept the no zips&amp;quot; then when looking at the models, the most beautiful ones were pretty much tease shoots, so I guess they figured those would tease me enough that seeing the less attractive ones nude would be enough. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quality on the videos is good, 720, but someone is going to have to explain to these sites that the higher the resolution, the higher the bitrate needs to be. 1000 is the bitrate and it seriously chugs along, maybe that is some sort of tease? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The videos on the main site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/&quot;&gt;Flashy Babes&lt;/a&gt;, could probably get away with a R rating. HBO After Dark type softcore. The videos on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/squirt4real/&quot;&gt;Squirt 4 Real&lt;/a&gt; are very X rated, not for sure if we still use XXX or not, but I would say XXX. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides the no zip problem, the pictures aren't very big, I found a few 1600 high end, but most are in the 1200 range. The videos are there in numbers with around 500, but a lot of them are just the photo shoot style videos. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/squirt4real/&quot;&gt;Squirt 4 Real&lt;/a&gt;, they only have around 30 videos. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site that saves this package of sites is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cherrypetite/&quot;&gt;Cherry Petite&lt;/a&gt;. If you like to see young, very amateur models, this girl is for you. She has a few tattoos that she probably wishes she didn't have. She isn't a glam model at all. Doesn't have any plastic surgery and wears very little make-up. But she is seriously cute, and she does do full masturbation in the videos. She kind of reminds of me of a new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brookeskye/&quot;&gt;Brooke Skye&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wish they had more content just of her. With photo sets around 70 and the same for videos, her site alone was worth the price for me. Also, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cherrypetite/&quot;&gt;Cherry Petite&lt;/a&gt; videos are 720 high end with 2000 bitrates. And those are worth downloading, all of them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a package, it is easy to recommend it. You get a full on tease site with Flash Babes, a full on hardcore site with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/squirt4real/&quot;&gt;Squirt 4 Real&lt;/a&gt; and you get a solo site of a very innocent looking woman that likes to masturbate in front of the camera. Recommended.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13584&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Flashy Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23232&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23232&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:30:40 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_17611</guid>
		<title>Flashy Babes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17611</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/flashybabes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Flashy Babes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Flashy Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-18-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:10am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;146&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Some swell looking girls you (probably) will not see anywhere else.&lt;br /&gt;
Ok amount of sets and videos.&lt;br /&gt;
Videos are the top here and good quality- generally.&lt;br /&gt;
Mostly canadian girls and most very sexy&lt;br /&gt;
If you like softcore solo-girls, you'll find something here that no other site have (it seems)&lt;br /&gt;
Easy navigating.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					No zip for photos (Man, it's 2008 - get your act together)&lt;br /&gt;
Some models are very &amp;quot;shy&amp;quot; or whatever. But some models do not even show their tits.&lt;br /&gt;
This could be considered as an american/canadian version of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/onlytease/&quot;&gt;Only Tease&lt;/a&gt; - but it's even more soft.&lt;br /&gt;
Could not get the &amp;quot;Live&amp;quot; part to work, maybe it's my own fault? &lt;br /&gt;
Expensive!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Browsed this site several times - then forgot all about it, until I saw silvers review.&lt;br /&gt;
When browsing the site again some real fine looking teens/girls came up.&lt;br /&gt;
The preview is ok, but get you to a point where you think the content is better than it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
I first went for the videos - as usual.&lt;br /&gt;
The best resolution is 720x480 - not top. But most videos are ok in quality - and then again the earlier videos still seem a bit blurred - even for 720x480.&lt;br /&gt;
They should do better in video resolution to make some kind of hit in the softcore-area.&lt;br /&gt;
Too bad some of the better looking models are doing videos extremely soft. No nipples, some keep their bra on and MOST do not remove their panties.&lt;br /&gt;
But - as mentioned - this is somewhat an answer to the british &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/onlytease/&quot;&gt;Only Tease&lt;/a&gt; - and if that's ok with you, this site is a fine alternative.&lt;br /&gt;
Still, you have to be a sucker for soft, because it's still $ 29.95 - and that's way too expensive for what you get, if you're looking for porn - even softcore.&lt;br /&gt;
And this is foremost for video-freaks. The photo-sets are fewer and there's no zip!&lt;br /&gt;
The navigation is allright with a lot of choices in browsing.&lt;br /&gt;
Do not know about the interaction, did not try, did not care.&lt;br /&gt;
Still - the live thing they promised did'nt wotk at all for this user.&lt;br /&gt;
Some good soft videos - but will NOT be back.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13584&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Flashy Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17611&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=17611&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:10:02 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_10229</guid>
		<title>Flashy Babes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=10229</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/flashybabes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Flashy Babes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Flashy Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-17-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:10am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 84&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2870&quot;&gt;silver&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2870&quot;&gt;35&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ High quality content&lt;br /&gt;
+ Hi-Res pictures&lt;br /&gt;
+ Exclusive videos and pics&lt;br /&gt;
+ Frequent updates (near daily)&lt;br /&gt;
+ Fresh faces&lt;br /&gt;
+ Models look natural&lt;br /&gt;
+ Sweet or Spicy rating system &lt;br /&gt;
+ Most babes are very cute&lt;br /&gt;
+ No DRM protection&lt;br /&gt;
+ No download limit&lt;br /&gt;
+ 2 bonus sites&lt;br /&gt;
+ You can see free video
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No ZIP sets for pictures&lt;br /&gt;
- Some of the sets are completely non-nude&lt;br /&gt;
- Header is not well-designed
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site offers pretty hot babes from all over the world. The site design is good with the exception of a header. It could be better. I've seen one interesting thing here. It is their Sweet or Spicy rating system, rating how 'far' the girl will go. From &amp;quot;bare breast&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;full nude&amp;quot;. Currently there are 18840 photos, 478 videos and 65 flashy babes. I haven't found any clips going longer than 10 minutes in time, most are around 5 minutes as an average. Videos are available in WMV format and at their highest quality (display at 720x480, 2000Kbps). Updates are made near daily. Most photos here display at a size of 1200x780. Everything can be downloaded. This is truly very soft porn. Frankly I have seen some of the sets that are completely non-nude, while other feature masturbation, didlo insertion, etc. If you’re an appreciator of pretty faces and lovely bodies ... well, welcome to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flashybabes/&quot;&gt;Flashy Babes&lt;/a&gt;.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13584&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Flashy Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=10229&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=10229&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:10:36 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>