PU - Glam Deluxe - New Reviews

Glam Deluxe Review

Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:06:09 PST

Glam Deluxe (1)

12-12-11 05:06am

REVIEW = 80 by tangub (103)

Pros:
Billing by CCBill
Bonus solo sites Helen�s Planet and Ema�s Place included.
76 beautiful models, mostly 18 to early 20s
Mostly exclusive content (see also cons)
Good quality high resolution photos with some of the latest ones as big as 3168 x 4752px although sizes vary quite a bit with most being in the 2-3000px range on the longest side.
Zip downloads for photos
Videos have choice of high or low quality wmv and can also be streamed.
Some nice info provided on each model.
Responsive and helpful webmaster

Cons:
A little pricey for the amount of content compared to similar sites in the niche.
Site barely updating, I�ve only noticed 1 new photo set added in the last 3 weeks
Content not date stamped so difficult to establish recent update history
Only 29 videos
Video quality poor to mediocre by todays standards
Site may be too softcore for some tastes although not a con for me
Only 1 size available for photos and with the high resolution that means some large zip downloads sometimes 400+MB
Undisclosed download limit, was 2GB per day but raised to 8GB after I got locked out and contacted webmaster so not really a con for me as I feel 8 gig is more than adequate for what is mainly a picture site.
Some non exclusive content noticed, Naomi here is also Jolina at Teenage Depot with some of the same photo sets although in a larger resolution here.
Ugly watermark/site logo on photos
A few low resolution photo sets at 1024px

Bottom Line:
Glam Deluxe is a teen glamour nude art site featuring a nice collection of models posing naked in what is 99% solo content with just the odd two girl set thrown in. The main photographer here is Thierry Murrell whose work you may have come across before if you�ve had a membership at Met Art. The overall theme is very softcore but most models do get fully nude with some spread shots. Just bare in mind that some don�t show everything particularly Emanuelle one of the hottest looking models who will rarely give you a glimpse of her pussy. Other favourite models for me included Kate, Nadja and Helena of Helen�s Planet. Currently there�s a total of 360 photo sets at the site giving you 25,000+ photos.

The navigation is pretty basic. You have a nice model index where clicking on the model will take you to all her photo sets and videos or you can simply browse through the updates list or a separate video listing. They don�t provide any extra search or sort tools and to be honest I didn�t really feel the need for it as it�s not the largest of sites.

Whilst there is some nice content here to please photo fans I feel there is little to offer for those in to videos. Going on past reviews there has probably been nothing added to the video collection for several years. The quality also would suggest they are not very recent with most being 640 x 480 or 720 x 576 in the highest resolution and bitrates ranging from usually 900 to 2000 kbps with a small number a little better at 4000 kbps.. Out of the 29 videos 10 of them are of Nadja and another 10 of Emanuelle so not much variety if you don�t like either of those models. Most videos 3-5 minutes long and often feature the model just dancing around with some naff music playing, certainly lacks any erotic appeal for me.

I did have a problem here at the start, first evening I was locked out of the site after downloading only 16 photo zips, no explanation as to what the problem was, just presented with a blank error page. Turns out I�d hit a 2GB download limit I knew nothing about, however after contacting the webmaster got a fast response and resolution to the problem and an increased limit to 8GB so a big thumbs up to Radik for excellent customer service.

Overall I enjoyed the high quality photo content here and think it�s worth a 1 month subscription to anyone who likes Met Art style teen glamour but without constant updates I doubt you�d want to stick around any longer. The deal here is clearly a little improved since lk2fireone�s 2008 review with the addition of zip files and two nice solo model bonus sites added to the package so for me that is worth a few extra points on the score

TIP: Sign up via Helen�s Planet or Ema�s Place to save $2 on the price, not much but every little helps.

Visit Glam Deluxe - View Replies - Add Reply

Glam Deluxe Review

Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:11:58 PST

Glam Deluxe (1)

11-15-08 03:11pm

REVIEW = 75 by lk2fireone (116)

Pros:
-Some good-to-great looking models.
-Content is exclusive to this site.
-High-quality glamour photography.
-No DRM video protection.
-No download limit.
-They do have a bio sheet on the models. But some of the information is fantasy or worthless.

Giving the age of the model, with no date to compare the age to, is not much use. Stating in
"sexual experience" that a model is a virgin, when I have seen hardcore clips of the same model
giving blowjobs and having vaginal and anal sex with different males, makes me wonder what kind of
virginity they are talking about. The hardcore clips of this model were posted on other sites long before the photoshoots of this "virgin" model were posted at glamdeluxe.
I realize that I should not be picky about factoids when posted at a porn site, but it pricks the fantasy bubble when the factoids are so obviously false.

Cons:
-Site does not update very often. Can go a week or more before a new photoset is posted. Very irregular posting schedule for updates.
-Only 1 photographer for the site: Thierry Murrell. He does glamour-type erotic photography. Usually nice clean pictures, but if you don't like his style, you won't like the site.

-Softcore only. Single-model posing. No boy-girl pictures. No girl-on-girl pictures.

-Site advertises "huge archive" of photosets and flix. But the site has only been around since 2006, and the "archive" is tiny compared to a super-site like met-art. The flix archive is really small, only 28 videos. New videos are added very, very slowly.

-The flix (videos) are basically a video of a photoshoot. And some videos are a collection of
individual pictures from the photoshoot, not a real moving-picture video.

-No zip files for the photosets. Need a blackwidow program to download a photoset. Otherwise, you have to download each picture separately, a real pain.

Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):-Photosets are in 1 resolution only. Do not have a choice of 3 different resolutions for downloads as you have at some of the better sites like met-art (low, medium, high resolution).

-Navigation could be improved a lot.
You go to the flix (video) page, which lists with a thumbnail of each video at the site. The hot-
link to download each video is not clearly marked. Maybe this is a French version of a joke, where
increasing the obstacles means increased pleasure when you reach the goal of downloading the video?

-Videos are listed separate from the photosets. So if you want to find whatever videos there are of
a girl, have to look at the video page, then scroll down the page to examine each video to see
which girl it is. Videos are not grouped by the model, but apparently in random order.

-They do not date the videos or some of the older photosets. I like to know when the photosets and
videos were shot, for my own interest.

-Models are white girls from Europe only. No blacks, Asians, other races.

-Photos have a watermark. Doesn't bother me, but some people dislike photos with a prominent watermark.

Bottom line:
-If you like softcore, glamour shots of single models, and you like the models you see on the tour, then this site is maybe worth 1 single-month subscription to get the basic files you want, and then maybe a visit once a year to get any updates. Hopefully, the site will last, because the
photographer does do quality work and picks some nice-to-great looking models. But a regular
subscription beyond 1`month is not worth the money.

-I wish I could give this site a much higher score, because I belong to it and hope it does not go out of business. But for this type of softcore photography, you get more for your money with met-
art > metmodels > hegre-art.

Giving this site a 75, because some of the girls are gorgeous, and the pictures are high-quality glamour shots.

Visit Glam Deluxe - View Replies - Add Reply

Glam Deluxe Review

Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:47:46 PST

Glam Deluxe (1)

01-03-08 06:47am

REVIEW = 73 by Drooler (218)

Pros:
+51 models, predominately Russian, some hot! (188 galleries)
+Photo quality has been improving, especially in 2007
+Most photos are between 2000 and 3500px on the long end
+Good server speed
+Login first requires typing in use-pass and a displayed code, but after that, just clicking the member�s entrance gets you straight in.
+Prompt technical assistance

Cons:
-No zips!
-Only about 12 photoset updates per month in 2007
-Photos in only one size
-Some earlier photos as small as 1024px
-Ugly watermark on pics
-Videos? Most links to videos in the models index are inactive.
-Videos? They�re slide shows! (Actually, they�re called �flix� on this site.)
-Only 23 �videos,� 7 of which are of the same model (Nadja)
-Sample file sizes: 16mb (wmv), 18mb (DivX), 124mb (Quicktime). The quality doesn�t seem THAT different.
-Not totally exclusive

Bottom Line:
I wonder if the term �flix� here is somehow intended to distinguish them from actual videos. As they are really awful, I also wonder who would want them. They are a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside three video format enigmas, especially Quicktime, which is about 5 times larger than the wmv or avi versions with no discernible improvement in quality.

The pics, on the other hand, are making me happier and happier as the quality is getting better, and some of their recent models are really beautiful and hot, including
Abigail (Anastasia atNubiles)
Darina (Emanuelle at Nubiles)
Francesca G (Olga at JustTeenSite, Ofemija at FemJoy)
June (aka Bianca, Ekaterina, Kamea, Katya, Tatyana)
Kayla
Lea (Masha at TeenDreams)
Victoria (Ira H at MetArt)
Yana, and of course
Helena (of Helen�s Planet).

One set, of their �Abril,� is the same as one on My Precious Virgins (as �Gaby�) � hence the �not totally exclusive.� Could such a thing happen again?

I do wish that the thumbs didn�t cut out part of what is in the actual photos, which sometimes is the case. �What you see is what you get� (WYSIWYG) would be a better approach.

That foamy green-colored watermark looks completely out of place on the pics, too. Yech!

And it�s about time that they at least provided zips (they do at their Helena's Planet) and 2 pic sizes (the current large size and one half that size). That would help the score.

Visit Glam Deluxe - View Replies - Add Reply

Glam Deluxe Review

Fri, 11 May 2007 07:15:14 PDT

Glam Deluxe (1)

05-11-07 07:15am

REVIEW = 50 by Play Toes (1)

Pros:
Many really beautyfull girls
Good (not excellent) pics resolution.
artistic

Cons:
Video quality is a shame at default size, just acceptable if the girl does not move too fast
don't try full screen unless you love squares.

Pics sections and pics themselves slow to load (even with a high speed broadband).
Pics are not dowloadble as zip so if you want a serie...you have to load one by one.

Bottom Line:
Speaking about models the site is good
But the cons above ruin the pleasure of seeing young beauties.

I hesitated long between 69 or 70 score, if i choosed 70 it is because i think the girls are what saves this site.

technical work is to be improved seriously.

Follow-Up:
Definately now i know i won't subscribe anymore to this site.
Renewal is.... let's say not worth paying for it

Visit Glam Deluxe - View Replies - Add Reply