PU - Mature.nl Network - All Activity

RE: little rabbit's Review

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:30:23 PST

Mature.nl Network (1)

01-18-08 04:30am

REVIEW REPLY by little rabbit (3)

To little rabbit (3):

"you seem to contradict yourself a bit".

When I see some known mature sites with a rating of 87, I have to rate this one with a 90.
It's not so complicate, just a necessary consistency.

And as I also list all the pro / cons I see, and also why I give such a rate, everybody can consider about.

Just have to read all what I wrote.

View Thread (4)

RE: little rabbit's Review

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:30:19 PST

Mature.nl Network (1)

01-17-08 06:30pm

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (17)

To little rabbit (3):

The further explanations do make it clearer why you would rate this a better than average site but, at least to me, you seem to contradict yourself a bit. In your original review you said it was repetitive: "the "screennplay" is really too repetitive : fucking, fucking and fucking". Now you're mentioning at least some variety, with lesbian and solo scenes.

I guess it's just a case of differing opinions when it comes to what makes a site rate higher. To me, even daily updates of women I find attractive will grow stale very quickly when there's very little "chemistry", as you put it. If too many of the models on a site are doing the same thing as the next, I don't know that I could put that site in the excellent category. A good example would be my re-review of ifeelmyself.com. It still has it's charm to me because they update daily and it's still very amateurish, but it's becoming so... damn... repetitive. Kind of like if I were eating roast beef sandwiches everyday for a month - I think I'd start to hate roast beef.

View Thread (4)

RE: little rabbit's Review

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:06:42 PST

Mature.nl Network (1)

01-17-08 04:06am

REVIEW REPLY by little rabbit (3)

To little rabbit (3):

Why I gave a 90 ?
It's very easy to understand : at mature.nl, the models look really like amateurs mature models.
With all other mature sites, the models have a monotonous looking.

Just take a look at allover30.com, for instance, to see what they will offer for the 2 next weeks....

And silicone chemistry, for one half of the models.

The videos are always with the same screenplay : a boring interview, and after this, 3 videos with a dildo, lying for 10 minutes on her back.

2 or 3 stagged crapelos, and : "Next One".....

Totally boring.

At least, at mature.nl, there are a little of lesbian show, and some good ones solo show.

And the most part of the models are not looking like a Playmate being past her prime.

The best could be a site with the AbbyWinters.com chemistry, and models from 40 to 60.
THis surely will come, but it's a dream, now.

View Thread (4)

RE: little rabbit's Review

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:28:16 PST

Mature.nl Network (1)

01-16-08 10:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (17)

To little rabbit (3):

If I've read you right, you've compared this site to other mature sites, they seemed popular, so that somehow means this site deserves a high rating? I'm just not too clear why you would give a site a 90 when you find it so boring, repetitive and lackluster.

Also, unless you join only sites with models, like MetArt or Femjoy, or masturbation or lesbian sites, I think you'll be sadly disappointed with most sites you might have a look at - I think it'd be safe to say that most hardcore sites will have at LEAST one guy for every woman.

View Thread (4)