<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Reality Kings - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_68346</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=68346</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-11-12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:08pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=16297&quot;&gt;BubbaGump&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=16297&quot;&gt;12&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-- Large Amount Of Content, both in quantity and variety. Enough to satisfy many interests. &lt;br /&gt;
-- High Quality Videos.&lt;br /&gt;
-- Sexy models. Model-types range from bra busters to thin and petite.  &lt;br /&gt;
-- Good number of sub-sites with decent content(mostly)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-- Streaming and Downloading can be hit or miss.&lt;br /&gt;
-- No High-Resolution Photos.&lt;br /&gt;
-- Repetitive photos in sequences.&lt;br /&gt;
-- Downloading Limit of 10 G daily.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A little background to put things in perspective:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With that being said, I have found the site to be somewhat lacking for my preferences, not in content or quality of the presentations, but in the medium available. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are looking for sexy models and high quality videos you will not be dissapointed. If you have a bias for high-resolution photography, you are likely to find the site lacking a bit in terms of photographic standards. However, given that I do view many of the images on an Ipad at times, this hasn't been a show-stopper. When viewed on a high-resolution flatpanel monitor, the images are lacking, simply due to the smaller formats and low pixel counts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The videos themselves are of high-quality and the camera work is fairly decent. Many of the scenes start with the model fully clothed and do not jump right into the action.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Navigating the site is very simple and straightforward. It is designed quite well and is not lacking here, IMO. Jumping from one site to the other is seamless. Getting to the downloads is also seamless and straightforward. Everything is a click away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as DL and Streaming speeds, this is where I give the lowest marks. At times, it was difficult to even stream videos at standard quanity. Most of the time, I was getting nowhere near the claimed DL speed and bit-ratre transfer when I did attempt to download videos at standard resolutions. The times I did try a HD download, I would often timeout and have to restart. On weekends, the problem was particularly noticeable. Slow connections are quite understandable at this time of the week. However, the server seemed to slow to a crawl and would often become asburdly slow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To sum up, if variety, quality content, and video presentations are your primary interests, it's a safe bet that you probably will not be dissapointed. If transfer rates and streaming connectivity are of paramount importance, I would take this into consideration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cancelation: Just a note on this as I know this is one of my concerns when I sign up over the net.  When I read reviews, I sometimes hear of extra charges taking place after an order has been canceled. I experienced no issues and giving notice of intent to cancel was no issue and took place as requested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grades: (obviously subjective calls, so take that into consideration as well.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presentation and Site Navigation: A&lt;br /&gt;
Overall Quality of Content: B+&lt;br /&gt;
Subject Matter Variety: A +&lt;br /&gt;
Content Variety for Varied Interests: A&lt;br /&gt;
Standard Video Quality: B&lt;br /&gt;
HD Video Quality: A&lt;br /&gt;
Scene Content and Videography: B+&lt;br /&gt;
Photo Gallery Compositions and Content: C+ &lt;br /&gt;
Photo Resolution and Image Quality: C-&lt;br /&gt;
The Models Themselves: A &lt;br /&gt;
The Action: B&lt;br /&gt;
DL Speed and Streaming: D-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My favorite sub-sites within the URL--relative to my interests and not quality:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dangerous Cuvres, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bignaturals/&quot;&gt;Big Naturals&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Least Favorite: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pure18/&quot;&gt;Pure 18&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;Cum Fiesta&lt;/a&gt;. (Models too thin and young-looking for my tastes)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other things to note: There is a download limit of 10 GIG daily. This was of no concern to me as I stream videos mostly and did not download much in the way of videos. If you are a massive user of downloadable HD video content, this very well might be soemething to consider. If you aren't downloading HD more than twice a day, it shouldn't be a problem. In fairness to these guys, you would have to be downloading a lot of content every day to hit the max.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suggestions for improvement:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Address concerns with streaming connectvity and download speeds. Slower speeds are to be expected on weekends but not weekdays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Add high-resolution image galleries. The days of CRT monitors have long since passed. 800 pixel-width images images no longer cut it in the day of 2800x1900 high-resolution monitors.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=68346&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=68346&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:08:28 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_68014</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=68014</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-02-12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:19pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6571&quot;&gt;slutty&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6571&quot;&gt;92&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Some attractive ladies&lt;br /&gt;
-Original content&lt;br /&gt;
-Excellent download speeds&lt;br /&gt;
-Download managers work (I used DTA)&lt;br /&gt;
-Good price through TBP&lt;br /&gt;
-Decent navigation, scene scores, search (although can be glitchy), model index, user comments&lt;br /&gt;
-Large network&lt;br /&gt;
-No DRM&lt;br /&gt;
-Zip downloads of photosets&lt;br /&gt;
-Decent photo quality&lt;br /&gt;
-Several updates a week, 10-12 on average it seems
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Odd biller&lt;br /&gt;
-Download limit, enforced regularly for me although others have reported otherwise (10 Gb)&lt;br /&gt;
-Video quality is okay on mid-sized videos, didn't download any HD videos due to limit&lt;br /&gt;
-No sizes given on videos&lt;br /&gt;
-Many of the sites are dead or infrequently updated&lt;br /&gt;
-Content can get repetitive&lt;br /&gt;
-A subjective opinion, but girls are too &quot;porn&quot; for me, lots of tats, large breasts&lt;br /&gt;
-Seem obsessed with ass, I like an ass and all, but move on after a while&lt;br /&gt;
-Camerawork is mediocre to downright annoying&lt;br /&gt;
-Male talent can get grating&lt;br /&gt;
-Lack of variety, even though it is a network serving several niches, all of the content has the same feel&lt;br /&gt;
-Too many ads, all over the damn place
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site used to be one of my favorites years ago, and everytime I join I am less and less impressed with it.  I read my review from before and am surprised I scored it so high, perhaps I was just in a good mood.  Regardless, I don't think I will be giving them another chance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site does some stuff well, navigation is pretty good, download speeds were excellent (I maxed my connection at 1.4 MB/s).  Their is some good material, and I enjoy the concept of some sites.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am just unsure as to why some of these sites even exist - if it has less than 10 updates and hasn't had a new one in years can't you just merge the content somewhere?  It just seems like an advertising gimmick.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is still some good material, particularly the older stuff.  But, it seems as though they have become far to focussed on the glam porn star look, even in their euro sites (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikesapartment/&quot;&gt;Mike's Apartment&lt;/a&gt; and Sex Parties).  For a supposed &quot;reality/amateur&quot; site, it just doesn't seem to fit anymore.  For those that are fans of the typical late 90's-style porn star, this site might still be for you, but it is no longer for me.  I grant you that this opinion is subjective, but they have definitely moved away from what I liked about the site.  Also, it seems as though they get more and more focussed on asses over time.  I like to see the entire woman, not 2 minutes of ass shots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On top of these somewhat subjective complaints, they have a relatively firm limit of 10GB now, although I never came within 500 MB of that limit I was cut off frequently.  I don't really consider myself a heavy downloader by any means, I tend to go through the screencaps to see if it is a scene I actually want.  If you are going to impose a download limit, you should take note of your file sizes, and let users know - a 10GB limit with files in excess of 1GB is just irritating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, I think this site still has some decent older material, maybe worth joining once to get it.  If you are into their older material, and unless you are totally obsessed with ass (not necessarily anal sex, just ass) I don't think you will be pleased with the direction of the site and I would recommend looking elsewhere, there are plenty of decent networks out there, although you may have to pay more.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=68014&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=68014&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:19:39 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_67802</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=67802</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-26-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:17pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1905&quot;&gt;rearadmiral&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1905&quot;&gt;141&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- 39 Sites on the network&lt;br /&gt;
- Some interesting niches&lt;br /&gt;
- Streaming available&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloads in at least two formats and three sizes&lt;br /&gt;
- Pics and screencaps available&lt;br /&gt;
- Most sites update regularly
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Several sites update irregularly&lt;br /&gt;
- Daily download limit (10GB +/- per day)&lt;br /&gt;
- Download limit appears to be applied unevenly to members&lt;br /&gt;
- ‘Cookie-cutter’ porn&lt;br /&gt;
- Download manager (Free Download Manager) wasn’t supported
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					RK bills itself as “the World’s Best Adult Network” but by subjective and objective measures I don’t agree with that.  It’s not a bad network, but it isn’t the world’s best.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The network is made up of 39 themed sites.  The usual porn themes are here, like big breasts, MILFs, and 18-year-old ladies, but there are also some fairly unique sites too.  There are three sites that cater to scenes with multiple models in party settings (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/vipcrew/&quot;&gt;VIP Crew&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthevip/&quot;&gt;In the VIP&lt;/a&gt; and Bikini Crashers).  These are among my favourites but I can understand why others may not be interested in them.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sites vary in size, with the more mainstream sites having lots of material (some have over 500 scenes) and some of the niche sites have only a handful of scenes.  Each site opens into a separate page that list the scenes with a large thumbnail for each.  On the left of that page is a column of filters for sub-themes.  The scenes usually have a unique name and the main star is also listed.  Opening the page for each scene brings more details and tags.  You can access screencaps and pictures (which I didn’t download so I can’t comment on them) and you can access the video in any of several ways.  Streaming is available, as are downloads.  Downloads are offered in a few different ways, usually as a WMV and MP4.  MP4 is available in larger sizes and smaller sizes for handheld devices.  For some reason, even the newer scenes are frequently broken down into shorter clips for easier download, though the full scene is also available.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HD video is available on some scenes, though I didn’t download any because of the daily limit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RK has been around for a long time so the quality of their videos has obviously changed.  Older videos are low quality, but I can’t fault the site for that because that was the standard back when they were shot.  Most of the older scenes are only available in three or four clips, which also made sense back when they were uploaded.  It would be nice if the site took the time to stitch them together into one full file now that most people have high-speed internet connections.  The newer scenes (in WMV) still aren’t great quality: 640x480 @ 1600kb/s and 768x432 @ 1600 are common.  Subjectively they aren’t bad, but they aren’t great either.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Objectively, the site is decent, but not any better than many other networks.  RK isn’t any better (or any worse) than places like Mofos and Porn Pros.  In terms of quality they certainly can’t be compared to sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/alsscan/&quot;&gt;ALS Scan&lt;/a&gt; and Diesel Access.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subjectively the network isn’t all that impressive.  I’ll admit that a lot of that is personal taste because I’m not into large breasts and huge asses.  Those attributes are better represented than most others.  There are sites that cater to my tastes in smaller models between 18 and 22, and I will admit I like the number of relatively unknown models who appear here.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One serious and unforgivable sin, and I realize that this is entirely subjective, is that one scene was mis-labeled.  No big deal normally, but I joined the network specifically to see one scene: a Tanner Mayes scene that was categorized as anal.  It might be called ‘anal’ because she has an anus, but no real anal sex occurs in the scene.  I will admit that the guy does insert the head of his dick a couple of times, but that doesn’t count as anal sex. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Easily the biggest annoyance with RK is their daily download limit.  While the limit itself would be annoying enough, they actually make it worse but applying it randomly.  The limit is described in the membership contract using vague language so I emailed the support staff to ask for some clarification but never received a reply.  Why bother having a ‘contact us’ button if you’re not actually going to respond to member’s questions?  On several days I was cut off from downloading at less than the 10GB 24-hour limit.  On other days I downloaded well in excess of the limit.  There are PU members who report never having had a limit imposed on them.  A site can certainly impose whatever conditions they want, but those conditions should be clear and applied equally to all members.  And in 2011 10GB limit is absurdly low.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another annoying choice that RK made is to not support download managers.  I use Free Download Manager to queue up scenes that I want to download so I don’t have to sit at the computer for an hour or more, but FDM wouldn’t work with this site.  I can’t say how it works with other managers, but if they bar one I’d guess they bar them all.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’d recommend this site for someone who really wants a particular scene or is really into a specific niche that is represented here.  But… anyone who does join should be aware that they MAY have a download limit imposed on them and that download managers don’t work.  So unless you have a real desire to see a certain scene or model here, RK has nothing special to offer.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=67802&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=67802&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:17:13 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_66053</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=66053</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-30-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:16am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=12376&quot;&gt;selphy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=12376&quot;&gt;15&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Cautions: Huge Network ! There are a lot of video scene, pictures, and variety of niches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Five sites worth the entire network: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pure18/&quot;&gt;Pure18&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;Welivetogether&lt;/a&gt;, Mikesapartments, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;Cumfiesta&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eurosexparties/&quot;&gt;Eurosexparties&lt;/a&gt;. They are impressive sites, for girls and niches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Good speed download, different video options (mp4, wmv, HD videos only for recent ones, iPod, mpg, single clips)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Good surfing ! For each scene you have: preview, pics, screen caps, trailer, comments, clips...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Good monthly price&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Regular daily updates (only for half network)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Download limit of 10gb daily (per site) makes impossible to dwn (and storage) or watch the HD videos (2 Gb size each) ! It is a nonsense...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- There isn't the size of the video files (it  would be important with the presence of the daily limit)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- RK HAVE TO EXPLAIN IN THE NETWORK HOW THE DWN LIMIT WORKS (because without sense in one day you can dan more than 10gb files from more sites, and other day NOT). WHY ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- A lot of sites aren't longer update (half of the sites of the network)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- In my opinion, the US-niche sites of the Net contains only few anal scenes...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					It is a huge network collection of AM and EU videos/pics ! There are about 30 sites but I've joined the network especially for some of those sites: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pure18/&quot;&gt;Pure18&lt;/a&gt;,  Mikesapartment, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;Welivetogether&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eurosexparties/&quot;&gt;Eurosexparties&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;Cumfiesta&lt;/a&gt; and Firstimeauditions that in my opinion worth the price of th entire Network.&lt;br /&gt;
At the beginning I was in doubt if join or not the site cause of the &quot;download limit&quot; of 10 gb/daily that the Netw impose for each site of the Net.&lt;br /&gt;
That is if you download/watch HD videos (about 2 Gb per video) it is very annoying, but if you download only the mp4 or wmv &quot;midsize&quot; videos (about 3-600 Mb per video, 768x432 format) you can see all the collection in two-three months !!&lt;br /&gt;
Yes there are a lot of amazing contents !!&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of the HD videos (only the most recent, 2011-2010 nd half) is very impressive, but you can collect only the most beautiful video in this format....(in my opinion) cause the limit of your personal storage size !!&lt;br /&gt;
I said that there are 2-3 site that are very very amazing !! That is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pure18/&quot;&gt;Pure18&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;Welivetogether&lt;/a&gt;; in my opinion they are the most worthy sites of the net. They deserve theirs reviews that I'do later....&lt;br /&gt;
But in few words: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pure18/&quot;&gt;Pure18&lt;/a&gt; i impressive for the girls. All the girls are very young, US-girls, semi-pro or at the first appearance but very very skilled !!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;Welivetogether&lt;/a&gt; is a lesbian site and it is very impressive for the variety of the scene-locations, for the climax (the most video are 3 way lesbians), and for the kind of shoot (few toys, a lot of wet kisses and tongues, tongues, and a lot of tongues...).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prices is good and it is right; I think that the Huge Network can't have a high prices cause it is impossible to view all their video collection in 1-2 months; with low prices you easy going on join the site for the time you want without spend an exaggeration !
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=66053&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=66053&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:16:14 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_63225</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=63225</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-09-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:18am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 87&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=252&quot;&gt;elephant&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=252&quot;&gt;47&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Well its a fairly huge site with what appears to be updating daily with 2 updates so theres plenty of bang for your buck here. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great price has to be mentioned and competes well with similar styled sites on the price front. The variety of sites will keep you busy for a good long while. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pure18/&quot;&gt;Pure 18&lt;/a&gt; is a great site though and I was a member years ago here and it's good to see it's improoved, theres now stories build up to the movies which I really liked and yeah the acting isn't the greatest but they do try and its quite creative. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biggest pro of the site for me was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eurosexparties/&quot;&gt;Euro Sex Parties&lt;/a&gt;.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I wasn't a big fan of lots of the material though, this is a personal thing, I for one don't like women with huge tattoos and fake boobs. I also am not a huge fan of huge butts and big boobs curvy mamas either so my tastes are catered for with the lesbian site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;We Live Together&lt;/a&gt;, there are some gems in there if I ignored the tattoed women on some vids. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthevip/&quot;&gt;In the VIP&lt;/a&gt; sites too, just don't get those vids, 20 girls dancing and then 2 some of 3 somes in the end, seems dissapointing, I'd love to see them all get completly named and orgy it up, don't know if that ever happened I never watched them all, my guessing it never does. But yeah I found this to much teasing with clothes on and flashing a bit here and there, no really too exciting in my eyes so I moved on quick from this site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
File sizes too are too big for me. Explained below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Navigation isn't the best and model index is in alphebetic first letter only so all names beginning with S are jumbled in S category and hard to search.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Its a good site and for some they would find it well above average for me I liked some stuff from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eurosexparties/&quot;&gt;Euro Sex Parties&lt;/a&gt; of my fav euro stars and the reason I joined really, maybe would of liked to of seen more from some of them but there is a couple of excellent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/sasharose/&quot;&gt;Sasha Rose&lt;/a&gt; flicks in there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mikes Apartment too I really like and another reason for joining, especially for Dominika, blimey o'Reilly she is hot, would loved to of seen more of her. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also I did like some we live together girls too but nothing to write home about. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lots of the sites don't interest me much but overall I do not regret the join and as I say some people will love this site, great range and if you like American girls mixed in with some cute European hotties then you might adore what the Reality Kings do here. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing I'd change though is up the resoluion on the medium quality vids, the highest is too large for me at in excess of 2.5gigs but some of the next ones down are too low at 400mb. Some of the 2005 stuff too is in 3 or more parts so they were not greatest of quality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Too many tats as mentioned and you gotta lot of those type of girlies here, that said its hard to choose none tattoo girls only in America as it sems 90% of porn actresses seem to have them. &lt;br /&gt;
There must be tattoo parlours making some good trade over there in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I gave it a above average score here mainly cause it's got variety and lots of people's tastes will be catered for.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=63225&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=63225&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 01:18:55 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_59805</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=59805</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-24-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:55am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=14712&quot;&gt;uberdong&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=14712&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Excellent video quality for the new updates.&lt;br /&gt;
Many different genres to surf.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The sex is borrrrrrrrrrring, I would compare it to something like having a Ferrari and driving it in a parking lot under 5 miles an hour at all times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one site with hot material &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flowertucci/&quot;&gt;Flower Tucci&lt;/a&gt;&quot; isn't even updating anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lots of the older vids are of poor quality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					90% of the material is unfappable. The HD looks great, but they aren't filming any sex worth watching with it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=59805&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=59805&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:55:54 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_58096</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=58096</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-23-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:18am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 50&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=14371&quot;&gt;sigh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=14371&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Decent amount of content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Where do I start&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos crash VLC 50% of the time&lt;br /&gt;
- Broken links to WMV videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Poor video quality&lt;br /&gt;
- Model information almost always limited to one model per video&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos that are dreadfully edited (download a 1.1 GB file for the thrill of 5 minutes of sex at the end!)&lt;br /&gt;
- Lots of missing screen caps &lt;br /&gt;
- Everything is designed to be difficult for anyone with a fast internet connection&lt;br /&gt;
- Download speeds acceptable if it doesn't decide to limit you to 3 videos downloading at a time
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Canceled my membership within 1 day. Downloaded 15 gigs of files and have 3.5 left after eliminating the unwatcheable ones (and that number will shrink, just too fed up to wade through them)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Honestly, just an awful experience...sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/videobox/&quot;&gt;Videobox&lt;/a&gt; have issues (new site design is horrible) but at least I never felt ripped off.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=58096&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=58096&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:18:25 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_48983</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=48983</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-10-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:07am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 88&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;messmer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428&quot;&gt;123&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Big network with sites that cater to most main stream niches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daily updates to varying sites. Update calendar is provided.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Excellent video quality even in the lower resolutions. Introduction of 1080p HD downloadable videos a week ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Excellent download speed. A huge plus with the new large HD files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Videos with a lead-in rather than just action from the very beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The price is right.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Files could be smaller? An average 1080p video can be 2-4 GB.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No &quot;official&quot; provision for downloading 1024 x 576px, 3036 total bitrate material offered in streaming as HD. The choice is between the smaller non-HD file  and the really big (1080p) one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intolerance of criticism. One of the recent updates had been offered before under the same name, same model .. same everything and two comments critical of this practice were removed by RK moderators twice.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					There have been many excellent reviews going into the technical details of this site so I thought I'd offer my personal experiences with this site rather than all the details. For details re. picture quality and resolution, for instance, please consult reviews below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find this network rather refreshing and on top of my list because the video quality is excellent. A small tip (and I think it must be okay with the site or they wouldn't allow it): if you really wish to download the streaming intermediary, 1024 x 576, 3036 total bitrate size (marked HD) files this can be done through an add on to Firefox called &quot;Flash and Video Download&quot; or possibly through your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realplayermovies/&quot;&gt;RealPlayer movies&lt;/a&gt; downloader. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just wish they would make it easier on us by adding it to the downloadable material listed to the right of the videos. I also find the smaller mpeg (mp4) files generally crisper than wmv. So if you have a slow download speed you will nevertheless find the smallest sized video quite acceptable if you pick mp4. Quality is certainly better than that found on most DVD sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also like the fact that natural breasts beat enhanceds hands down. Exotics4me lists them as 85% natural and 15% enhanced. So far I have found nothing to contradict his estimate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love the fact that every video starts with a lead-in, sometimes it's the &quot;hunt&quot; for a model, sometimes there's a bit of a story but it is a refreshing change from Gonzo. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all an excellent site that would have rated 90+ with me if it hadn't been for the fact that the site moderator twice removed my comment referring to the fact that one of the updates was a &quot;re-run!&quot;
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=48983&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=48983&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:07:36 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_50907</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=50907</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-21-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:18pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 86&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6571&quot;&gt;slutty&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6571&quot;&gt;92&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Vast amount of content&lt;br /&gt;
-Regular updates on most of the main sites&lt;br /&gt;
-Download managers work, I tried DTA and GetRight&lt;br /&gt;
-Decent download speeds, I averaged about 800 KB/sec&lt;br /&gt;
-Good price for the amount of content you get&lt;br /&gt;
-Excellent variety, pretty much everything is here except hard fetishes&lt;br /&gt;
-No DRM&lt;br /&gt;
-Zip Downloads of photosets&lt;br /&gt;
-MP4 and WMV video quality were good, but not great, both at 768x432 1500 kbps.  I thought the MP4 looked better, but neither were super crisp at full screen.&lt;br /&gt;
-In-browser video player is pretty good, can seek easily without excessive buffering.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-I find there to be a few too many ads, ads when you login, pop-ups&lt;br /&gt;
-Website can be glitchy, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthevip/&quot;&gt;In The VIP&lt;/a&gt; has been disabled for video downloads for almost a week.&lt;br /&gt;
-Older content often in three parts still&lt;br /&gt;
-Navigation could use some improvement, sorting is a bit odd.&lt;br /&gt;
-A bit heavy on the large breasted women for my tastes, but there is plenty for anyone&lt;br /&gt;
-They advertise it as HD, but this is only available in streaming format. I would say the streamed HD content is mediocre as far as HD material I have seen (not sure how to check the specs on this).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I think this site is pretty excellent, although to me not quite the best out there - as they advertise.  There is a wide variety of content, although the primary focus of most of the sites is hardcore material of some sort.  If you are looking for solo material, this isn't the place to look.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do enjoy that the site has model interviews, and other such activities instead of jumping straight to the action.  I see this type of thing as a positive, I suppose others might not like this, or consider it a waste of HD space and download time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me this site appears to be another site that is focussing a bit too much on quantity over quality.  Compared to the last time I was a full-access member here a couple of years ago, I found that a lot of their newer content was not up to the quality standards of previous years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other main drawbacks to this site are the sites general practices.  Advertising on the homepage that video is in HD, but not allowing people to download said video is a bit iffy in my opinion.  Also, excessive advertising, and pop-ups are a bit much.  I often get a popup to that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flingcom/&quot;&gt;fling.com&lt;/a&gt; place when I go straight to the member page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all, a pretty decent site if you are into hardcore material.  If you are looking for downloadable HD content or solo material I would probably look elsewhere.  If the site could improve the quality of some of the recent material as well as improve some of the navigation/site issues, it could in fact be the best porn site on the net.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=50907&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=50907&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:18:24 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_50768</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=50768</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-18-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:15am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=13074&quot;&gt;SteveO&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=13074&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Site looks great and is well put together&lt;br /&gt;
- Tons of original and exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
- Calendar with the upcoming weeks updates&lt;br /&gt;
- Convenient &quot;download view&quot; window makes it easy to download full video, video clips, or zip file of pics&lt;br /&gt;
- You can save you favorite girls and keep an eye out for new updates&lt;br /&gt;
- There are 27 sites that each have a different theme&lt;br /&gt;
- Hundreds or models and thousands of pics and videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Great download speed&lt;br /&gt;
- Great price&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy site sign up&lt;br /&gt;
- You can click on a girl for her basic stats and a list of other shoots available&lt;br /&gt;
- Good search function&lt;br /&gt;
- Many videos come with some acting
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- The models in pure 18 are pretty much the same models in cum fiesta, big naturals, and a few other sites. The models are definitely under 25 but don't look that close to 18.&lt;br /&gt;
- The picture sets seem to be taken at the same time as the video. This isn't always bad but looking at the pics it kinda like oh yea I remember that from the video. I like it when some of the shoots are just for photo. &lt;br /&gt;
- Hundreds of pics from each shoot may give you pic overload. i.e. you download 1- zip set and now you have 4000 pics and you don't have the time to look at that many pics&lt;br /&gt;
- Some videos come with acting that is often not the best quality but its easy to skip if you don't like it.&lt;br /&gt;
- Reality is kind of lacking from the site. Most of the porn seems to be professional.&lt;br /&gt;
- Bio on models could be longer
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					For less than 20 bucks I think this site as really good. From the second I entered the site I was impressed with how great the site looked and how easy it was to navigate. With 27 different sites, each with a different them, I kinda didn't know where to start. Some of my favorites are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;Cumfiesta&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;We Live together&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/captainstabbin/&quot;&gt;Captain Stabbin&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikesapartment/&quot;&gt;Mike's Apartment&lt;/a&gt;. Most of the porn at these sites have some basic story line to them but the story doesn't really seem to get in the way of the sex. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, I really like the layout of the site. When you find a shoot you like the &quot;Download/View&quot; box makes download a snap. I don't use the stream buttons much but streaming seems to be fine. If you like one of the models from the shoot you can click on her name and the site takes you to a short bio about the model and a list of other shoots starring that model. There is a good search function for both model and for type of shoot. If you really like a certain model you can save her and then check her page for updates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing I found funny is the fact that the site is called &quot;Reality Kings&quot; but it seems like most of the content is generated by professionals. Although some of the sites have a more amateur feel than others. This didn't really bother me much because, in my opinion, the content is generally better than amateur type porn anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also liked the fact that many of the models seem to move from site to site. If I find a model in &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;We Live Together&lt;/a&gt;&quot; I will get to see her in hot girl on girl but I am not likely to see her in M/F action. But if I click on her name I may find that she also models in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pure18/&quot;&gt;Pure 18&lt;/a&gt; and has a great M/F seen on that site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing I did find is that some of the girls on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pure18/&quot;&gt;Pure 18&lt;/a&gt; site tend to look like they are under 25 but not really close to 18. I also think that the MILF and Its Real sites are kind of a bore and the content is not so good.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=50768&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=50768&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:15:56 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_50454</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=50454</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-08-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:00am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 88&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3465&quot;&gt;Goldfish&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3465&quot;&gt;63&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ HUGE amount of content (5K+ videos/2500K+ pics)&lt;br /&gt;
+ Web site easy to navigate.&lt;br /&gt;
+ I didn't actually confirm this fact but all network sites seem to be updating. If not, they all have enough content to at least be worth visiting.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Great variety in themes, women, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
+ There are common threads between network sites but there is enough difference between the sites so they can stand alone. &lt;br /&gt;
+ Some videos start off with a bit of a storyline (May be a con for some but I like it)&lt;br /&gt;
+ Great streaming videos quality. (Also, enough bandwidth to handle it.)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- The biggest negative is the tease of having HD streaming video while the wmv download files are of lesser quality (720 x 404/1.4Mbps)&lt;br /&gt;
- I was a big fan of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikesapartment/&quot;&gt;Mike's Apartment&lt;/a&gt; movies a few years ago. Both the beauty of the models and the quality of the directing has gone down.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Reality Kings does not fail to impress! I joined up with the network when they had the $9.95 special. I didn't expect much but was pleasantly surprised it was such a high quality site with so much content. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RK is one of those networks that has something for everyone. They use North American, South American and Euro models depending on the site you're on. They also focus on some specialty niches like big natural breasts and MILFs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though they do have something for everyone I personally enjoyed most of the sites. Those who are not super picky will probably feel the same. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site navigation is solid. You can browse by site or by model. You can also filter on categories. With so much content an advanced search feature would be helpful but what they have isn't bad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I understand the marketing strategy of keeping the best quality video to streaming but it is annoying. I'm hoping it is merely a hard drive space issue and they are upgrading to provide the HD in other formats.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=50454&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=50454&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:00:49 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_49191</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49191</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-25-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:06am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4804&quot;&gt;bigmeat43&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4804&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Nice clear site. Beautiful women. Easy to go around site. A lot of videos. Great price. Does have many options to watch videos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Buffing takes forever if you steam only, which I only do. Even the flash option takes forever. No bonus sites like other site have. Once again what is up with the buffing on this site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I do remember being a member of this site a while back and now I know why I quit giving my money to this site. It was because the steaming options suck big time. Un-less someone helps me fix this big problem I will not re-new and not even for the great price
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49191&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=49191&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:06:22 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_48662</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=48662</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-10-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:20pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 96&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;431&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Huge network that covers most niches with 100% exclusive content. &lt;br /&gt;
- DL Limits that used to hold this network back seem to be completely gone. Will give details in BL. &lt;br /&gt;
- No less than 8 of the sites on this network could stand on their own. Personal favorites are: 8th St. Latinas, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikeinbrazil/&quot;&gt;Mike in Brazil&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/moneytalks/&quot;&gt;Money Talks&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikesapartment/&quot;&gt;Mike's Apartment&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
- Video quality on vast majority of videos is 720 high end. &lt;br /&gt;
- Pictures for every video come zipped, two types, HQ photos that are not screenshots and a separate screenshot zipped folder as well. Not all sets have both though. &lt;br /&gt;
- Download speeds reach the 90% range of my top DL speed. &lt;br /&gt;
- Signing up though TBP then clicking back-up credit card processor provides billing through Epoch with the great $18 price. &lt;br /&gt;
- They have as racially diverse selection of models as any site I've been on with their only weakness being in the Asian category.&lt;br /&gt;
- Big butt, big boobs, little boobs, little butts, lesbian, MILF, public, Latina, black, interracial, gangbang, etc...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- This one doesn't bother me much, but the HD videos they advertise aren't quite HD and only available as stream. &lt;br /&gt;
- Wish they would at least put the old videos files into one scene. Several of their best scenes are available only in 3 parts. This is a very small percentage around 10% at most.&lt;br /&gt;
- Just not a lot to find in the cons outside of subjectivity now that they don't seem to be enforcing their DL Limits.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I remember back when Reality Kings sites had a 1 GB DL limit per day per site. That went up to 10 GB then it became one that I believe was 15 full scenes per day. Here are a few numbers from the last month. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most downloaded in one day: 83 GB&lt;br /&gt;
Most content from one site: 8th St. Latina 468 GB&lt;br /&gt;
Total downloaded in a 1 month period: 1.2 TB&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No DL limits on any of those. It's easy to group RK with the other networks, but I look at it as more of a DVD site with pictures and screenshots available in zips. It's funny how perception can change the way this network is looked at. How many DVD sites are there that have 100% exclusive content, multiple daily updates, zipped photos and screenshots for $18? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The content gives you a nice variety as well. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/milfhunter/&quot;&gt;MILF Hunter&lt;/a&gt; is as good of a late 20s to late 30s model site as there is. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/moneytalks/&quot;&gt;Money Talks&lt;/a&gt; is as good of a public/exhibitionist site as I've seen. The trio of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/8thstreetlatinas/&quot;&gt;8th Street Latinas&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikeinbrazil/&quot;&gt;Mike in Brazil&lt;/a&gt; and Saturday Night Latinas covers the Latina niche as well as any site does. Many of these Latina models are not seen on other sites and do no more than 3-4 sets in their career. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikesapartment/&quot;&gt;Mike's Apartment&lt;/a&gt; could reasonably compete with any of the Euro hardcore sites and gives this network the edge over the others with a full Euro site for those who want a break from American models. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;We Live Together&lt;/a&gt; is one of the better American lesbian sites. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthevip/&quot;&gt;In the VIP&lt;/a&gt; gives you the voyeurism/exhibitionism niche. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just can't see anything major to complain about. The quality is comparable to the big DVD sites plus pictures and screenshots and 100% exclusivity. The only complaint that applies to me is the one about the older videos being split into parts. They have one model, Giselle2, who is one of their most popular models and has one of their most popular scenes, but it is in 3 parts. The HD part or lack thereof doesn't bother me too much since the scenes are already big. Most of the scenes on this network clock in at over 30 minutes. I've seen one video file as large as 850 MB, the accompanying photo set is 185 MB and the screenshot file is 155 MB. Making the three files over 1 GB so if you bumped it up to HD video, it would be near 2 GB for the three. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do get cheesy plot lines in most of the scenes and after awhile you may border on being bored since most of their sites and content are based on niches. It's one of the strong points of porn, but also one of the weak points. The videographer/photographer chit chat isn't near as bad in the newer scenes than it used to be. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From doing a scan through of their models, lets go with 85% natural, 15% with implants with a +/- 5% for error. There are plenty of amateur models, esp. in their Latina sites that you won't see anywhere else. Throw in their take on the CFNM niche with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cfnmsecret/&quot;&gt;CFNM Secret&lt;/a&gt; and I would say they have pretty much every niche covered and do a good job of each. I would like to see them add some Asian models or site, but that's minor. As highly recommended as I can go on a network.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=48662&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=48662&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:20:36 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_48270</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=48270</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-28-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:38am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 86&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=11543&quot;&gt;Bumble B&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=11543&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ a lot of content and a great variety of models&lt;br /&gt;
+ pornstars, starlets &amp; amateurs&lt;br /&gt;
+ daily updates&lt;br /&gt;
+ streaming&lt;br /&gt;
+ pic sets in zip format
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- resolution of vidz could be higher &lt;br /&gt;
- not all vidz in full HD&lt;br /&gt;
- not all sites are regularly updated
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Reality Kings features a lot of content on 28 different sites. In other words: Reality Kings have everything you're looking for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact their content is similar to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/naughtyamerica/&quot;&gt;Naughty America&lt;/a&gt; or Brazzers, but offers a nice variety of models - teens, MILFS, amateurs, real &amp; fake tits, outdoor action, ect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reality Kings is worth a try.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;
Bumble B
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=48270&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=48270&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:38:03 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_47907</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=47907</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-19-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:33am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=12585&quot;&gt;AleksandrOrlov&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=12585&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Tons of content approx over 5000 scenes&lt;br /&gt;
* variety in type of content&lt;br /&gt;
* High resolution videos&lt;br /&gt;
* Lots of different pornstars&lt;br /&gt;
* Multiple updates per day&lt;br /&gt;
* streaming and downloading&lt;br /&gt;
* pics sets are in zip format
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Advertisements in members area&lt;br /&gt;
* Video quality not full HD&lt;br /&gt;
* Some sites are no longer updating&lt;br /&gt;
* Timed links, so download queing not possible
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					There are tons of different sites, within the network of over 6000 pornstars. Many networks focus on a few select niches but Reality Kings seems to have a little bit of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For $18 a month they give you access to 28 sites that all have downloadable videos and picture galleries. They are 2 updates per day across the sites with many different niches covered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pictures and videos should be higher resolution. I would not consider 720x as proper HD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Worth a shot at a membership.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=47907&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=47907&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:33:21 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_45731</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=45731</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-18-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:01am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 93&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=12157&quot;&gt;Helvetic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=12157&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ great amount of content (thousands of scenes from 28 sites)&lt;br /&gt;
+ variety of models (European, Latina, ... )&lt;br /&gt;
+ both WMV and MP4 format&lt;br /&gt;
+ no DRM&lt;br /&gt;
+ low monthly price (special offer $18 recursively) (see cons)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- relatively low resolution for video (720*480)&lt;br /&gt;
- not all sites are (regularly?) updated&lt;br /&gt;
- cross-sales (extra $27 recursively)&lt;br /&gt;
- if trial is selected, monthly price is $40 recursively (see pros)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Reality Kings is first of all &quot;amount and variety&quot;. With 28 sites in the network they can give everything: European, Latina, Black, etc girls; places; actions; and, in the same time, all that is well structured using those sites as sub-directories. As for amount, an attempt to estimate it yourself will be much better evidence than any figures (as they claim more than 5 thousand hours of video and 6500 scenes). And all that is daily updated!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other side, Reality Kings are not the best place to test the full power of modern computers: with video resolution of 720*480 (and some older content is even lower) there is no necessity in 900*1400 monitor. MP4 could be appreciated by Mac users; its quality is relatively the same. Much better quality (1280*720) is available in streaming form (so cannot be saved) and for only last half-year updates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And, finally, their pricing is pretty friendly, if to count their special offer ($18 monthly, recursively), and not to forget to uncheck extra default offers unless desired ($27/month recursively, for those who love pre-checked cross-sales). Risky trials ($1 for 2 days + $40/month then) could only be interesting, if one likes counting remaining minutes instead of simply enjoying the process. And the most strange way is to use their alternative card processor, as, despite selected &quot;1 month&quot;, a 3 day trial for CHF 10.62 and then CHF 85.73/month recursively (roughly €7 and €59 respectively with no further comments) has been proposed without giving any other choice. Be careful!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=45731&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=45731&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:01:08 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_43523</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=43523</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-17-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:27pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 92&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3600&quot;&gt;Robbi81&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3600&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- alot of content&lt;br /&gt;
- many well known pornstars and amateurs&lt;br /&gt;
- very good customer service&lt;br /&gt;
- updated daily
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- download limit&lt;br /&gt;
- some sites are no longer updated&lt;br /&gt;
- older scenes are not compressed into 1 single scene but multiple clips
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site is well put together and I will definitely come back to it. It is especially good that they redue the website every so often to keep it looking fresh. One of the best networks on the web.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=43523&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=43523&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:27:13 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_40899</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=40899</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-06-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:10pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 93&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=11065&quot;&gt;wickedness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=11065&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The kings were my first sub i have to say and have herd canceling your subscription had been a bit of a hassle but i found it quick and painless.  They had loads of content and they have some wicked hot chicks on their.  The website wasn't to bad to navigate around either.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I really wish you could use a download manager, and they have a few adverts and also cross sales gta watch out for them.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I have to say reality kings was great and made it easy for me to download or watch their content and i have to say they have loads of it.  I know sometime in the future im sure to sign up again &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is my first review so any suggestions would be great thanks
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=40899&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=40899&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:10:23 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_40856</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=40856</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-05-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:54pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 93&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=11099&quot;&gt;Knoman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=11099&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+High Quality&lt;br /&gt;
+Consistency&lt;br /&gt;
+Notable Stars&lt;br /&gt;
+Content&lt;br /&gt;
+Variety&lt;br /&gt;
+Excellent Older Content&lt;br /&gt;
+Amateurs (of all ages, shapes, and sizes)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Not enough A...&lt;br /&gt;
-Updates/Customer Service better than good but not on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brazzersnetwork/&quot;&gt;Brazzers&lt;/a&gt;/BangBros echelon&lt;br /&gt;
-Also more expensive if I remember correctly?
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					One of the best sites on the net... top 5 if not top 3. Just not quite as satisfying as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brazzersnetwork/&quot;&gt;Brazzers&lt;/a&gt; and BangBros experience. Still - if I had to join three sites this might be one of them. The older content is even better than the current providing the type of excellent amateur variety that tops the biz. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Will probably join again in 3-6 months, for the fourth or fifth time.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=40856&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=40856&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:54:38 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_39137</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=39137</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-22-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:18pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5789&quot;&gt;morgentau&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5789&quot;&gt;12&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ thousands of hardcore scenes&lt;br /&gt;
+ many scenes with hot and enthusiastic girls&lt;br /&gt;
+ some of their sites have interesting and original concepts&lt;br /&gt;
+ fun niche content that is still mainstream-compatible&lt;br /&gt;
+ good amount of US, Latina and European content&lt;br /&gt;
+ good value if you join with one of the many discount offers&lt;br /&gt;
+ search across all sites&lt;br /&gt;
+ easy to navigate&lt;br /&gt;
+ fast download speeds (I could max out my 6Mbit connection downloading from Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
+ same price for European customers
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- videos only have average video quality (720 x 480 px)&lt;br /&gt;
- older scenes have low video quality (480 x 320 px)&lt;br /&gt;
- pictures have low resolution (640 to 900 pixels on the long end)&lt;br /&gt;
- older scenes are split into multiple parts&lt;br /&gt;
- quite a bit of repetitive content&lt;br /&gt;
- some (few) of their sites could be named &amp;quot;generic porn site no 0815&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
- false advertising for HD content&lt;br /&gt;
- sites could use some descriptions or introductions&lt;br /&gt;
- advertisements for third party content inside the members area&lt;br /&gt;
- download links time out after a while making it futile to use download managers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom Line:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Realitykings&lt;/a&gt; is one of the largest providers of exclusive porn on the internet. While they only release two or three updates a day, their backlog has reached a size of &amp;gt;5000 scenes. The site tries to explore a variety of niches and fantasies while staying smack in the middle of mainstream pornography. The various sites act more like subcategories, so you only have one login and one site layout to deal with.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Realitykings&lt;/a&gt; provides a decent mix of ethnic variety. I'd estimate that about 50% of the girls are white Americans, 20% are Europeans, 20% are Latinas and 10% are African Americans. Unfortunaltely Asian girls are underrepresented on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Realitykings&lt;/a&gt;. The girls are usually grouped into different sites based on ethnicity. While this makes finding ethnic content easier it also limits the possible fantasies. You will not find any black girls on &amp;quot;CFNM secret&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hotbush/&quot;&gt;Hot Bush&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; for instance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In terms of fetishes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Realitykings&lt;/a&gt; doesn't stray far from mainstream porn. The lesbians still look pretty straight to me, the &amp;quot;first time audition&amp;quot; girls still act quite professionaly and the &amp;quot;CFNM&amp;quot; girls still drop their panties. If you are not strictly looking for fetish content these &amp;quot;almost niche&amp;quot; sites provide a nice introduction to various fantasies though. &lt;br /&gt;
The sites could use some descriptions or introductions. Who would know what &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flowertucci/&quot;&gt;Flower Tucci&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; is or could tell the difference between &amp;quot;8th street latinas&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Saturday Night Latinas&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video quality is excellent for all newly released content - if you judge by standards of four years ago. Honestly, I was a bit disappointed by the clarity and overall quality of the videos. They are still pleasant to watch and by no means bad, but one of the big names in online porn can certainly do better than this. Even the eastern European sites have upgraded their equipment quite a while ago. Surely they don't have a bigger budget than &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Realitykings&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
I also wish &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Realitykings&lt;/a&gt; would upgrade their older content. Some of the best scenes from &amp;quot;Mike in brazil&amp;quot; are from 2005/2006 and video specs like &amp;quot;480x320 20.00fps 500Kbps&amp;quot; simply don't cut it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All picture sets accompany a matching video and are produced in the same way: The actors play out a scene similar to the video shoot and the photographer constantly clicks away with his camera. This results in extremely large picture sets with often more than 600 pictures in a single set. The pictures only have a slightly higher resolution than the video content which comes out to a resolution of 0.27 to 0.54 Megapixels *cough*. I don't think any pic-lover can be content with this. &lt;br /&gt;
Cleary these pictures are meant to be viewed as a slideshow and, actually, I can recommend the sites slideshow feature as an alternative to the streaming video. The picture is much clearer than the streaming and even the downloaded video, and the pix are often shot at a better angle too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was quite pleased with the cross site search of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Realitykings&lt;/a&gt;. It will match model names, site names, keywords and descriptions of the scenes. A search for &amp;quot;asian&amp;quot; gives me 123 results across all sites, which is about 2% of their total content. Finding scenes with asians any other way would require a lot of effort. It is also possible to make searches like &amp;quot;asian AND blonde&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;asian NOT 1on1&amp;quot;. Some scenes are tagged incorrectly though.&lt;br /&gt;
*zoidberg voice* Hooray! I exceeded the maximum review lenghth */zoidberg voice*
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=39137&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=39137&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:18:25 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_39086</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=39086</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-21-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:44pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2878&quot;&gt;chancler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2878&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					a lot of content, good looking women, good price* (see my cons about price complaint)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					some of the camermen really suck, some of the older video quality is pretty bad. I signed up under a $9.95 a month deal. I was a member for over a year, and when I needed to update my expiration date on my card, they want me to pay full price!!!.  Fuck that.  I should not have to almost double my membership fee because I need to update my card.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Good site with a major flaw on customer service. Somebody who wants to stay a member should not have to double their fees if they joined on a discounted price when it comes time to renew your credit card.  If you plan on joining this site, make sure you have plenty of time left before your cc expires.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=39086&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=39086&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:44:48 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_37673</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=37673</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-20-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:10pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 93&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;431&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- My favorite of the big booty, big booby, networks. Tons of content, multiple sites that could stand on their own. &lt;br /&gt;
- Despite the daily download limit of 10 GB, I'm not bothered by it. If it were 1-2 GB per day, that would bother me, but as it is, I could realistically download 300 GB in a month. &lt;br /&gt;
- TBP discounted price&lt;br /&gt;
- Covering most of the bases when it comes to broad range of cultures, white girls, Latinas, black girls, this is what sells the site to me. &lt;br /&gt;
- Some of the sites included have been longtime favorites like Mike in Brazil, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/8thstreetlatinas/&quot;&gt;8th Street Latinas&lt;/a&gt; and Round and Brown. &lt;br /&gt;
- Quality is good enough for me. Newest download from Mike in Brazil is 720x404 with 1400 bitrate. Will further this thought in BL. &lt;br /&gt;
- Each video comes with zipped screenshots, I like these as a throw-in, but they're not going to blow you away with quality. &lt;br /&gt;
- I'm getting good connection and DL speed, about 95% of my max download speed&lt;br /&gt;
- Daily updates
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- The download limit could be a con to some, but I do have trouble listing that a site with what equals a 300 GB monthly limit equals a con. I only have a few site folders over the years that total 300 GB. &lt;br /&gt;
- I have found a few, probably less than 1% of the videos that are not available anymore. &lt;br /&gt;
- Content can be repetitive. Then again curvy butts never get repetitive to me! &lt;br /&gt;
- Some of the sites are no longer updating. I thought &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cfnmsecret/&quot;&gt;CFNM Secret&lt;/a&gt; had a ton of potential, but only one update this month. &lt;br /&gt;
- Some of the older content on the longer running sites is split into parts on the videos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is a re-review of a site that I hadn't been back on since about 2 years ago. I had to talk to myself reasonably about the DL Limit and how 300 GB in a month is more content than I usually download from any site in a month. This network, like Brazzers and Bang Bros is very high on the curvy models. I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/a&gt; a bit better because my favorite models are Latinas and they have a lot of Latina content. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sites I like best with the network in order:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikesapartment/&quot;&gt;Mike's Apartment&lt;/a&gt; - Almost 100% Euro models in mostly hardcore action, a few solo and g/g sets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/8thstreetlatinas/&quot;&gt;8th Street Latinas&lt;/a&gt; - Mostly straightforward hardcore sex. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikeinbrazil/&quot;&gt;Mike In Brazil&lt;/a&gt; - The Brazilian girls in hardcore action. Serious booty moving in these. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/milfhunter/&quot;&gt;MILF Hunter&lt;/a&gt; - Late 20s, early 30s models in hardcore action.&lt;br /&gt;
Round and Brown - Mostly black girls, but some dark Latinas as well, more curves than the autobahn. &lt;br /&gt;
In the VIP - Gives you a bit of a voyeur feel since they are supposed to be in a club. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;We Live Together&lt;/a&gt; - G/G/G sometimes more! Older sets are much better than the newer ones though. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/moneytalks/&quot;&gt;Money Talks&lt;/a&gt; - Takes on a bit of an exhibitionist side. Models, women on the street are offered money to show skin in public. Also has some terribly painful humiliation clips including a guy putting his dick in a mouse trap for money. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those are the ones off the top of the head, but I have content from all 28 sites. All follow the curvy theme. I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikesapartment/&quot;&gt;Mike's Apartment&lt;/a&gt; could easily stand on its own, don't get any ideas &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/a&gt;! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/8thstreetlatinas/&quot;&gt;8th Street Latinas&lt;/a&gt; as well. Both have years of content built up. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Onto the quality issue. My biggest concern with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/a&gt; advertising HD on their main page, is just think how fast the download limit would fill up. The most recent Mike in Brazil clip is 720x404, 1400 bitrate, right at 40 minutes long and is 418 MB in size, double that to HD and the amount is near 1 GB, with a 10 GB limit per day that could become frustrating. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do like the screenshots that you can download. These more of less look like a picture you or I could have taken with our personal camera. These are especially good in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/moneytalks/&quot;&gt;Money Talks&lt;/a&gt; series. You can see that the content is live and the public is walking by without noticing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They do have a CFNM site, if you've followed my reviews, these are usually well-liked by females, my wife likes them, but they aren't updating much anymore. They also didn't follow the CFNM rules, but it is still good. In their CFNM the man eventually gets more than a handjob. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For me, the network is as good or really better than most DVD sites since the different sites separate the content into niche for you. They do also have a bit more variety than the other networks mentioned have. One thing to keep in mind. Eventually you get tired of any niche. This is where repetition sets in. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall though, Euros, Latinas, black girls, white girls, it is like a buffet of women to me! DL limit notwithstanding, I recommend it, especially for the discounted price.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=37673&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=37673&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:10:25 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_37672</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=37672</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-20-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:02pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3633&quot;&gt;hockeyman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3633&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Gorgeous women&lt;br /&gt;
Great breadth of sites with specific content&lt;br /&gt;
Updates at least once a day
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The material gets boring after a while&lt;br /&gt;
Situations are so fake that it is very hard to believe
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I got the impression that this site (or collection of sites) had a tremendous amount of content.  That is the promise rather than the reality.  Not to knock it, they sites are great and the women are beautiful, but the content is not really that original and the scenes are so staged that they are boner-killers.  So, I like the site, and the review is overall on the positive side, but not the best site on the web.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=37672&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=37672&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:02:53 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_33931</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=33931</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-17-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:49am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 74&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5645&quot;&gt;Jeffrey99&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5645&quot;&gt;27&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+Great content and tons of it&lt;br /&gt;
+Good quality videos (720x480 @ 1500kbps)&lt;br /&gt;
+Access to 26 sites.&lt;br /&gt;
+Most of the 26 sites are updated weekly, a few aren't updated anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
+Nice price from TBP, $17.95 a month. Otherwise it's $24.95 a month.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Doesn't use CCBill (Uses Secure Billing Worldwide, SBW)&lt;br /&gt;
-Pictures are nothing more then vid caps and poor quality (900x602)&lt;br /&gt;
-Doesn't allow use of Download Managers
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I really liked the content of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;RealityKings&lt;/a&gt; and based on content alone, the site would rate high 80's or low 90's.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 However what kills me about the site is that download managers aren't allowed. Well technically you can use them but you can only download 3 movies at once. You cannot que up 10 or so movies and let them download throughout the day. If you do que up lets say 5 movies, once it gets to the 4th or 5th one, it'll end up saving it as a .html file. If you open that it says &amp;quot;Your BigMovie link has expired! Please revisit the update page to regenerate a new one&amp;quot; So it comes down to only being allowed to download 3-4 files at a time. I don't know how it works with the smaller files, as I have no interest in downloading a ton of them when they have the full links available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;RealityKings&lt;/a&gt; is pretty much a video only site. The pictures are nothing more then vidcaps and are 900x602. The videos are good quality, being 720x480 @ 1500kbps. The videos are available to download in 4 smaller parts or in 1 big wmv. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, if they'd get rid of the stupid time expiring link to download the movies, the site would be great. However the fact that you can't even download more then 3 files without the link expiring, makes it a no go for me. So if you like to just que up a Manager with 10 or so files and leave it for the day, then I can't recommend this site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=33931&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=33931&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:49:38 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_29285</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=29285</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-01-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:12am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 84&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5994&quot;&gt;TrashMan&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5994&quot;&gt;103&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+Search function searches over all networked sites&lt;br /&gt;
+More than one video format (WMV, MP4).&lt;br /&gt;
+Scenes available in one-file or split scene&lt;br /&gt;
+Screencaps and HQ images provided with all new scenes&lt;br /&gt;
+Ability to comment and rate every scene&lt;br /&gt;
+Excellent job in getting actress names correct and tagged properly&lt;br /&gt;
+Excellent job in converting older sites and adding them to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/a&gt; network. This only occurred recently, so kudos to them.&lt;br /&gt;
+No second login to networked sites (except those which haven't been converted to the RK network yet)&lt;br /&gt;
+Image galleries downloadable as ZIP files&lt;br /&gt;
+Downloads work with all download managers!&lt;br /&gt;
+100% original content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-2 updates/day rather disappointing&lt;br /&gt;
-Download quota. Once reached you can't download the one-file, you are limited to the split scenes.&lt;br /&gt;
-Really not fond of the Browse page. Even to this day I have difficulty finding the link to view all updates by date of addition.&lt;br /&gt;
-While they have done an excellent job of converting the a lot of the older sites and their content to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/a&gt; network a lot of sites have yet to be converted. People don't realize they are missing out on some quality content on sites that are not listed in the bonus section and have not been networked into RK (more below).&lt;br /&gt;
-A few too many advertisements in the members area. Advertisements on the tour page? Fine, but keep them OUT of the members area.&lt;br /&gt;
-They have definitely removed certain old scenes which I liked and can only now be found in the depths of the internet (more below)&lt;br /&gt;
-No bonus content!&lt;br /&gt;
-Um, the pornstar listing is not alphabetical. You click a letter than you get a huge display of unorganized names.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Quick note: RK = &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/a&gt; (to save characters), TBP = TheBestPorn!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK so about those missing sites.  Just goto TBP's review of RK then click on the list of sites that are owned by the parent company. If you ever get RK membership just compare the network sites to the ones in that list (avoiding those which are part of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/muffia/&quot;&gt;Muffia&lt;/a&gt; network, which is not part of RK) you will find the following sites that have yet to be converted and added to the RK network:&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/allamateurmovies/&quot;&gt;All Amateur Movies&lt;/a&gt; (straight)&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/boysfirsttime/&quot;&gt;Boys First Time&lt;/a&gt; (gay)&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/extremeasses/&quot;&gt;Extreme Asses&lt;/a&gt; (straight, black)&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/extremenaturals/&quot;&gt;Extreme Naturals&lt;/a&gt; (straight, only big tits)&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/megacockcravers/&quot;&gt;Mega Cock Cravers&lt;/a&gt; (straight, real big dicks, mostly interracial)&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/papi/&quot;&gt;Papi&lt;/a&gt; (gay)&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realorgasms/&quot;&gt;Real Orgasms&lt;/a&gt; (solo)&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/topshelfpussy/&quot;&gt;Top Shelf Pussy&lt;/a&gt; (straight)&lt;br /&gt;
*Wives in Pantyhose (rather milf-ish straight)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of these sites WILL work with your RK login, however they require a second login and they are not linked on the RK network page. So if you are not aware of TBP you would be at a loss. There are some quality scenes from quality girls on those sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And about that comment that they have removed some old scenes: If you visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/allamateurmovies/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/allamateurmovies/&quot;&gt;AllAmateurMovies&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt; and scroll to the bottom of the tour page you will see a scene preview images for a girl named Jamie. That his not her real stage name, that being Becky LeSabre. This was her one and only hardcore b/g scene and it is nowhere to be found on the RK network (it was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;CumFiesta&lt;/a&gt; scene and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;CumFiesta&lt;/a&gt; was converted into the RK network). You can find it in the depths of the internet, but it should NOT be that way. If they have removed that scene then it is indicative of them removing more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK so overall RK is one of the best network sites out there. It rivals Brazzers quite well. And because RK is just the new organized network for the old &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;CumFiesta&lt;/a&gt; network of sites (circa 2001) RK has a crapload more material than Brazzers, although a lot of it is not up to the newest scenes' quality standards. Both sites add 2 scenes per day, have 100% original content, do an excellent job of listing the proper cast in each scene, have networked search features, allow download managers and pretty much allow the user a lot of freedom.  The major areas where RK and Brazzers differ is 1) RK provides fewer format options (although as long as I have HQ WMV available I am happy), 2) no bonus content, and 3) the download quota.  I docked 10 points off of RK's rating because of that stupid quota. After you hit the quota you can't download the 1-file full scene downloadable, you get limited to the split-scene downloads. It is really annoying.&lt;br /&gt;
However it is worth noting that I think RK bests Brazzers in a few areas. 1) RK provides a better variety of girls, not just focusing on girls with fake D-cup (or larger) boobs, 2) more networked sites, 3) they don't overfilm certain models (Brazzers has 21 Gianna scenes while RK has 9, and its 24 to 7 for Eva Angelina).  The price is superb ($17.95/mo) and would highly recommend the site to anyone looking for this type of site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=29285&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=29285&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 01:12:48 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_28778</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28778</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-21-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:23am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5982&quot;&gt;EroticShot&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5982&quot;&gt;18&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Adding my 2 cents:  This is a must-explore for any porn/erotica afficionado.  You must try it for a month or 2.  The sheer volume of content here is staggering.  RK is one of the largest video content sites on the net with origiinal productions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you join - search back into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/milfhunter/&quot;&gt;Milfhunter&lt;/a&gt;'s archives for incredible early reality-porn genre content.  It's classic stuff!  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;Welivetogether&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt; was wonderful in its early days - as was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthevip/&quot;&gt;inthevip.com&lt;/a&gt; and mikesapartment - really fantastic girls and content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will laugh a bunch as these guys have a sense of humor akin to the BangBros (Sanchez) team - they ham it up and keep it rolling.  Look for cameos by a lot of pornstars and recognizable people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MUST explore.  You will not be disappointed.  Don't join for glamour-glam - that's not what this is about - it's about people in silly scenarios trying to play off the scene...and some genuinely fantastic old content!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Great download speed, huge amount of content.  It's a great site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quality could be higher on many of the vids...alas!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Join for God's sake.  If you don't already know this site and have an affinity for the reality porn concept - check it out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of their scenes have freebies on the main site prior to login.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28778&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=28778&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:23:08 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_28714</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28714</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-19-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:32pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5975&quot;&gt;Victorycreed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5975&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Their like some of the sites and they do updated them every week.  They've scheduled which sites' update will occur.  Each day has three sites being updated, but not all three are updated.  Their bookmarking service are very responsive.  Some of their videos for particular sites are very large, but contain more than one sex scene.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For you extreme hardcore fans, they have a bonus sites for you who have an interest for the questionable females.  And I'm not talking about lesbians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plus the webcam feed they announce are pretty sweet.  I'm not that much interested in webcam girls stripping and interacting with the views, but they do provide them at no charge.  One, Molly, almost pushed me into the dark, webcam side when I saw her performed(Don't worry, you can mute the music).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/milfhunter/&quot;&gt;Milf Hunter&lt;/a&gt; fan and, upon purchasing a membership, a major problem occurred.  THEY'VE DELETED SOME OF THEIR VIDEOS.  So, if your a fan of the website and was think about it based on past videos, then you may not want to join.  I went on looking for some and found that not all of them were available anymore.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LARGE VIDEOS.  Well most of them were annoying.  I came to watch porn, not some goofy people trying to resemble &amp;quot;Jackass.&amp;quot;  This is very important when you factor that you have a downloading limit.  One was more than a gig and haft to most is of them have non-sexual fun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another major problem.  Download limit is shady.  I'm okay about downloading limits(Sorry), but  when I was downloading the videos and zips onto a folder and it indicated that it contained 4.3gs. I DIDN'T EVEN REACH THEIR LIMIT and they gave me the 24 hour lock down.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some videos are sections.  So, you'll probably need an editing software to put videos together to get the complete vide0.  SPAM
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The site is okay, but the content isn't going to keep me in.  Some content are in sections.  Downloading limit is shady and they will lock your ass out for any amount they wish.  BEWARE: DOWNLOAD LIMIT IS NOT 10G NOR 5Gigs. I was locked out for 4.3 gigs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, if I and you people have to watch the amount of info we/re downloading, BEWARE that haft to most of that is just them having clothed, non-sexual fun.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/moneytalks/&quot;&gt;Moneytalks&lt;/a&gt; have them asking guys to do some strange things and that's what your downloading.  Near the end of the video is the actual sex.  What the hell is that?  If you still want to join is that you can download it in sections and paste the sex part together.  Great I'm their freelance/non-paid editor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One new addition to my review is the strange abundance of sex Spam that I've began receiving now.  I rarely got them, but after joining my email has gotten more emails for these strange ads.  Thanks for selling my email you bastards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazzers, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/naughtyamerica/&quot;&gt;Naughty America&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brainpass/&quot;&gt;Brain Pass&lt;/a&gt; and the Video Box never did this, but apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/a&gt; love to.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28714&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=28714&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:32:58 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_28126</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28126</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-07-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:58pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 50&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2198&quot;&gt;User&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2198&quot;&gt;32&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Content looks good from the OUTSIDE
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Downloads very inconsistent. Most videos do not download. &lt;br /&gt;
Customer Support is TERRIBLE
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I joined the site with a FULL membership, not a trial. I am a veteran of many sites, but this is the worst I've ever experienced. I was impressed with the array of sites and the fresh faces not seen on many other sites. &lt;br /&gt;
I use both Firefox and the latest version of IE for browser. With Firefox I have the ability to use a Download manager, but need not do so if the site is not compatible. &lt;br /&gt;
At  first, I was able to downolad a couple of videos. I have a very fast connection, so I DL the full files, not the fragmented ones. &lt;br /&gt;
Out of about 50 files attempted, I was able to get 5. The rest would DL 4-24Mbps and then quit. I tried with the DL manager and without. I tried with Firefox and with IE. &lt;br /&gt;
I contacted their Chat three times and they have some very canned things they tell you to try. NONE of them could fix the issue. &lt;br /&gt;
I have asked for a full refund, but am not confident one will be forthcoming. &lt;br /&gt;
I also wrote to their Customer Support email address but received no reply in more than 24 hours.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28126&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=28126&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:58:55 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_27275</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=27275</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-22-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:59am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3281&quot;&gt;morecumplay&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3281&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					good looking latinas&lt;br /&gt;
great looking girls&lt;br /&gt;
many sites&lt;br /&gt;
great group scenes on erosexparty&lt;br /&gt;
overall good site
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					never had so much proplems downloading some porn in my life&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Download limit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
download speed is very slow during peak time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
many scene without full scene download&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
many site have condoms for most scenes
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					worth the fee foe the latina site alone, caution if you don't like condom sex. give it a try for a month and get most of the best scenes
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=27275&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=27275&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:59:53 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_25725</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=25725</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-15-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:29pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 62&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5342&quot;&gt;laxattack34&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5342&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Lots of gang bangs and orgies, if you're into that sort of thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- More black actresses than other sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Tons of sites. 24, by my count.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Billing practices bordering on fraud.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Poor customer support related to billing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Some sites have tired, predictable scenes
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I gave RK a chance. But they screwed me on the billing and now I have to call it like I see it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I called customer service to cancel my FULL membership (for which I wasn't allowed FULL access to RK content), I provided my credit card number. The woman said she could find no evidence of the number in her system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, she couldn't cancel my account.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I got off the phone, looked at my credit card statement and saw that I was billed for the trial membership and the FULL membership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I got back on the phone, with a different woman, and gave her the credit card number and mentioned that the charges appeared on my statement. Again, they couldn't find my credit card number.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've contacted my credit company and asked them to stop all further charges to RKNETMEDIA. We'll see what happens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rest of the company:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site is fine. As I mentioned, a nice mix of ethnicities, and more black women than a lot of other sites. Good variety overall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid credit card anxiety, though, go elsewhere.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=25725&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=25725&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:29:42 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_24255</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24255</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-08-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:53pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 88&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4956&quot;&gt;joeyhart1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4956&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* 100% reality content, which make the situations realer.&lt;br /&gt;
* Every niche you could possibly want to jerk to.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tons and tons and tons of photos per update.&lt;br /&gt;
* Moving towards the big dick niche, if you're into that.&lt;br /&gt;
* Super easy to navigate the members area.&lt;br /&gt;
* Enormous catalog, you will never have to watch the same scene twice (if you don't want to) ;)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Lots of attractive girls, lots of non-attractive girls (aka fillers in the past).&lt;br /&gt;
* Too much talking from the cameraguy.&lt;br /&gt;
* The script doesn't change too much, so-to-speak.&lt;br /&gt;
* Some sites don't update anymore unfortunately.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Worth every penny because of all the content you get. There are a few things that could change, but overall it's got a lot of bang for the buck.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24255&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=24255&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:09 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23374</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23374</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-13-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:07pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 97&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4992&quot;&gt;Julian4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4992&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Has something for everyone.&lt;br /&gt;
-Tons of HOT girls.&lt;br /&gt;
-Comes with other sites&lt;br /&gt;
-Quick downloads and streams&lt;br /&gt;
-Did I mention hot girls?
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Some sites doesn't have weekly updates..but there's always new videos everyday.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Subscribe to it. Don't waste you money on the trial, get the full thing!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23374&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23374&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:07:38 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_22299</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22299</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-14-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:55pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4757&quot;&gt;MJDiddledmyPP&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4757&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Tons of girl, all shapes and sizes.&lt;br /&gt;
They have a site for whatever kind of mood you're in.&lt;br /&gt;
Live web cam girls 3 nights a week.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Customer service sucks!&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the sites have gotten away from the &amp;quot;real looking&amp;quot; girls, to more of model/porn star looking women.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					It's a verry good site.  I've used it off and on for about four years now.  I've tried to use other sites like it, and it has been the easiest one to navigate.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22299&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=22299&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:55:38 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_20999</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20999</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-07-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:30pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4439&quot;&gt;indybt30&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4439&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Variety of models&lt;br /&gt;
-Price for all the sites you get&lt;br /&gt;
-Variety of video downloads (1 minute clips to full movie)&lt;br /&gt;
-Lots of high quality photos available in ZIPs&lt;br /&gt;
-Easy navigation (look up by models, or keywords)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Unnecessary talking from the cameramen that is distracting&lt;br /&gt;
-Condoms&lt;br /&gt;
-Sites use pretty much the same scripts, just different types of women and locations
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I have been a member of this site on a few occasions and consider it to be a winner everytime. It has good navigation within each site and good navigation from site to site. Although I find that talking camermen and condoms distracting, I would recommnend that anyone who is into great looking women of all kinds join this site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20999&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=20999&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:30:38 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_17224</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17224</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-09-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:53am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=331&quot;&gt;pinkerton&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=331&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Plenty of sites to choose from and it's fairly cheap.&lt;br /&gt;
Lots of pretty girls though quite a few are regular stars on other network's porn sites.&lt;br /&gt;
No download limits.&lt;br /&gt;
Works well with my download manager.&lt;br /&gt;
Straightforward navigation and browsing.&lt;br /&gt;
Photo sets provided as zip files.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The only good sites are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;Cum Fiesta&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikesapartment/&quot;&gt;Mike's Apartment&lt;/a&gt;, perhaps followed by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/8thstreetlatinas/&quot;&gt;8th Street Latinas&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/milfhunter/&quot;&gt;Milf Hunter&lt;/a&gt; (if you like 'em more mature with bad boob jobs).&lt;br /&gt;
Overall video quality is reasonable at best - older clips are split into 3 or more files and aren't great at 350x240; newer clips are 480x360 split files and the very latest are 720x480 in one file.&lt;br /&gt;
Quite a few photo sets seem padded out with too many similar pics e.g. final 20-30 pics of the set are the girl's face just after the cum shot with little difference between each pic.&lt;br /&gt;
Very little 2-on-1.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Not a bad network of sites but in comparison with the competition, they're about 3 years behind in terms of video quality.&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why sites don't remaster/recode the older videos to bring their quality up to date with the latest updates but in this day of HDV sites, the older vids here are only really fit for viewing on mobile devices.&lt;br /&gt;
Some may argue that the less than great quality videos adds to their reality feel - a fair point, but one that's lost on me.&lt;br /&gt;
For me, the stand-outs here are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;Cum Fiesta&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikesapartment/&quot;&gt;Mike's Apartment&lt;/a&gt;, the other sites didn't do that much for me.&lt;br /&gt;
It's 5 bucks cheaper that most sites but then I might be willing to pay the bit extra for better quality if that what it takes.&lt;br /&gt;
The actual quality shown in the previews of some porn sites actually matches their content, but that's not the case with the RK sites, so I probably won't be back anytime soon.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17224&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=17224&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:53:25 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_15489</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15489</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-27-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:00pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 86&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=27&quot;&gt;King&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=27&quot;&gt;27&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ Unique ideas of making shots&lt;br /&gt;
+ Exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
+ Good dose of reality&lt;br /&gt;
+ Good download speed&lt;br /&gt;
+ Very good site design&lt;br /&gt;
+ Frequent updates&lt;br /&gt;
+ Good video quality&lt;br /&gt;
+ All content is dated&lt;br /&gt;
+ Pretty cheap&lt;br /&gt;
+ Huge collection
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Older videos don't have full download option&lt;br /&gt;
- Also they are 15fps!!! Can't really watch it!&lt;br /&gt;
- Video are not compressed very well. They could be lower in size with such quality&lt;br /&gt;
- Download limit! Though got better lately
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Site is a variety of different niches. You find here something for sure.&lt;br /&gt;
What is worth recommending is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthevip/&quot;&gt;IN THE VIP&lt;/a&gt; series which takes into real places. A lots of butts to see before having an action. Really enjoyable!&lt;br /&gt;
The next site to recommend is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;WE LIVE TOGETHER&lt;/a&gt;. Off course for all of you les lovers. Really nice ladies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/vipcrew/&quot;&gt;VIP CREW&lt;/a&gt; will show you how to party! All those naked babes in the pool. Great views!&lt;br /&gt;
They also added recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bigtitsboss/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bigtits/&quot;&gt;BIG TITS&lt;/a&gt; BOSS&lt;/a&gt; - similar to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bigtitsatwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bigtits/&quot;&gt;BIG TITS&lt;/a&gt; AT WORK&lt;/a&gt; site, imho.&lt;br /&gt;
And a very fresh site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/monstercurves/&quot;&gt;MONSTER CURVES&lt;/a&gt; presenting babes the way you have to watch them :D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general it makes the site pretty unique in content with a HUGE collection of materials to watch and download.&lt;br /&gt;
Really good site design, one of the best imho.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ENJOY!!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15489&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15489&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:00:41 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_12845</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12845</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-27-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:19pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2927&quot;&gt;PosterDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2927&quot;&gt;14&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ Lots of HD Video&lt;br /&gt;
+ Many sites for price of 1&lt;br /&gt;
+ Good sex sceen with girl solo first to warm up than man come in for boy-girl fuck.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Man they use has big cock which is good for girls and they like&lt;br /&gt;
+ really cannot think of any more good things
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Video Looks Stretched more than HD should be that makes girls look fat&lt;br /&gt;
- Many not cute girls&lt;br /&gt;
- Pictures are not more than same as video and small&lt;br /&gt;
- Limit of downloads is very bad&lt;br /&gt;
- to little updates&lt;br /&gt;
- 20 sites for 1 price you should be warned&lt;br /&gt;
- sceens with 2 girls or more and man seem fake with unatural acting and moans.&lt;br /&gt;
- I emailed about download limit and no email back.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					They offer 20 sites for price of one but all 20 are not as good as many single sites. I joined for one or two girls I love and they were only on 2 sites &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pure18/&quot;&gt;Pure18&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;We Live Together&lt;/a&gt; and each just one video with each girl.  Then no more site update for sites I like only other sites of 20 I do not like.  Best example of company good at taking your money and marketing (look 20 sites for 1 price) but content do not deliver.  I should no better, over years sites that offer many sites for one price have never been good. I will cancel site and not come back.  To many better sites for money.  72 rating is fair and honest.  Guy that voted 50 was just mad I think.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12845&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=12845&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:19:23 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_12618</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12618</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-21-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:12pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 50&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=885&quot;&gt;drranger&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=885&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Great movies.  Great selection. Would give it a 95 except for the cons.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Download Limit!!!!!   No excuse for this.  No warning when you sign out.  To impose a download limit without warning or notice is fraud.  It is implied that you would have unfettered use of the site.  But they ripped me off.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As such, they are worthy of a 0 but since I can only go as low as 50 that is what they get.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					No warning of download limit.  There is no excuse.  This is worse than bait and switch.  It is fraud.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12618&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=12618&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:12:21 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_10123</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=10123</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-14-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:37pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2914&quot;&gt;cwpuk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2914&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ Huge movie collection all in the reality format&lt;br /&gt;
+ Mostly great looking girls&lt;br /&gt;
+ Downloads in one big file (most movies) or split downloads
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No support at all, never received a reply&lt;br /&gt;
- Daily download limit&lt;br /&gt;
- Video quality are not great on older movies, new videos are higher res, but still not perfect&lt;br /&gt;
- Picture quality not great&lt;br /&gt;
- Download speeds are not great
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Overall I really love this site as it is absolutely huge and has a varied array of sites.  My favourites are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthevip/&quot;&gt;In The Vip&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eurosexparties/&quot;&gt;Euro Sex Parties&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/vipcrew/&quot;&gt;Vip Crew&lt;/a&gt; (does not appear to update anymore) and most of the others are great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My score would have been much higher if it wasn't for their lack of support.  I've frequently had password problems and have never received a reply from their support.  Luckily each time it has happened I've been near the end of my membership.  My score would be in the high 80's if they ever bothered to reply to me.  The billing company although helpful cannot help you out if you don't get an answer from the website owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are prepared to run the risk of getting no support should a problem occur then it's a good site to join.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=10123&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=10123&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:37:12 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_9877</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9877</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-07-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:31pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 60&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1597&quot;&gt;Malkav&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1597&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Incredible amount of movies&lt;br /&gt;
* Good variety of content&lt;br /&gt;
* Easy to navigate the sites&lt;br /&gt;
* Choice of downloading movies in full/split files
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Some sites not updated for a long time&lt;br /&gt;
* Download limit 3Gb pr day (and they then cut of all access to the sites for 48 hrs)&lt;br /&gt;
* No support. Don't expect replies&lt;br /&gt;
* They will not give you your money back, even if it is advertised on the sign up page *EDIT: I STAND CORRECTED - LOOK IN FIRST REPLY TO REVIEW TO FIND OUT HOW TO PROCEED SHOULD YOU WANT TO DO THIS*
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Fantastic looking sites, very good content and amazing amount of download content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really wanted to give this site a higher score, but when they have a 3Gb download limit pr day, and if you go over you can't even visit the sites, it gets hard. To enforce a download limit THAT low gets ridiculus when alot of the internet users to day have a capacity to download a lot more pr 24 hrs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Breaking point for joining site or not: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you going to download a lot of movies/ have a high speed internet access? I am sorry to say that it is not worth the money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Low speed internet/ only interested in certain scenes/ certain chicks? It is worth it&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Edited to take down the score - Reason:   I have only been able to access sites 1 off every 3 days. They keep blocking you for 48 hrs if you download more than 3Gb. And there is NO response from support.*
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9877&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=9877&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:31:29 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_9177</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9177</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-14-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:23am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;431&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Very impressive reality network that has several sites that could be stand alone sites. &lt;br /&gt;
- Covering pretty much every niche imaginable, big butts, big boobs, girls next door, MILFs&lt;br /&gt;
- They have zipped pictures of the sets which is pretty nice, you don't see that on networks that often. &lt;br /&gt;
- Video quality is great, 720x480, videos are long too, which could be a con as well&lt;br /&gt;
- Great download speeds, but I think I am in the same state they are. I'm hitting 1,400 kb/s
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Files are very large, I downloaded one that was nearly 900 MB, not really a problem for me, I have 2 TB of free hard drive space. Could be for some.&lt;br /&gt;
- Advertising for some could be a problem&lt;br /&gt;
- Bad acting! I know that busty Evie D is not innocent!&lt;br /&gt;
- Humor could be a problem for some, I like it, as long as it isn't too degrading.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is a follow-up edit, after posting my review, I hit the DL Limit two days in a row, both were around 8 GB. This will take off 4 points of the total score, since 8 GB per day is still a lot. That adds up to 240 GB a month, which I'm not for sure that I could or would ever download that much from a site in a month. Still recommended and still a very good network, but beware the limit. I hadn't went over 5 GB and had been fine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since then I've went as high as 5 GB on some of the sites without a problem. The basis of these sites is fairly realistic, somewhat silly at times. Like having sex with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/8thstreetlatinas/&quot;&gt;8th Street Latinas&lt;/a&gt; by telling them they can get their green card. The VIP seems pretty believable, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;We Live Together&lt;/a&gt;, to me is about as real as lesbian sex will get in porno. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the humor at times gets a little old, it is still better than the sites that have abuse, spitting, smacking and so on. So far, I have been happy enough with the network that I plan to let it rebill for at least another month. The update schedule is pretty good with 2 sites getting updated daily, everyday of the week. None of the sites are bad at all. Well except that Tranny one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love the Latina sites and the big butt ones. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/welivetogether/&quot;&gt;We Live Together&lt;/a&gt; could also stand on its own as could, VIP, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;Cum Fiesta&lt;/a&gt;. All for $25, that is a good deal to me. I will review some separately since they deserve a full review. For my money, this network is the best going! Definitely recommended!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9177&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=9177&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 04:23:24 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_8494</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8494</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-24-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:27am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;227&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					As the TBP-rating goes here (80): Very good - in some ways.&lt;br /&gt;
Vast amount of content with 20 or something sites to go to.&lt;br /&gt;
New design, with better navigation. Small clips for the looooong videos are swell.&lt;br /&gt;
Good updates, fine quality of the later videos - same goes for photos and these guys know about zip.&lt;br /&gt;
Sexy US-based girls/women and some fine videos of girls from the east (Europe). Latins, too.&lt;br /&gt;
A smaller amount of great videos with very sexy looking models - both americans and european
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Most importend cons. here are the length of videos.&lt;br /&gt;
Average 450 mb for whole videos.&lt;br /&gt;
Boring in the long run.&lt;br /&gt;
Stupid remarks and laughter during the endless videos - well some may enjoy that, I don't.&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the approx. 21 sites are just boring - but they keep the good sites up. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mikesapartment/&quot;&gt;Mike's Apartment&lt;/a&gt;/&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cumfiesta/&quot;&gt;Cum Fiesta&lt;/a&gt;)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site - or rather network - has really good moves. I have found maybe some of the finest videos of easteuropean girls here.&lt;br /&gt;
The newer ones are absolutly the best - concerning quality - the old videos are poor, at the best average - and the problem is, that &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; videos are not that old (late 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
So you do not get the vast amount of good quality - you only get an average amount of good quality.&lt;br /&gt;
I've found some very sexy clips of girls from the eastern front - girls we have seen at DDF.&lt;br /&gt;
Here at RK they comes in a new style - and with SOME good HC-content.&lt;br /&gt;
But my problem with this network or their &amp;quot;clones&amp;quot; are the size/lenght of the whole videos.&lt;br /&gt;
Average 450 Mb - it's almost like a whole movie. And the way these guys come up with a 450 Mb for one video-scene is &amp;quot;cons.&amp;quot; for me. Too much talk, too much time to watch non-erotic stuff. (jab,jab, jab).&lt;br /&gt;
They seem to tend to the ways of Bang Bros. - where the problem is just the same. Ekstremely boring in the long run.&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, you can now download fragments of every video, but that makes me miss the point of good porn...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8494&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=8494&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:27:20 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_7200</guid>
		<title>Reality Kings Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7200</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realitykings.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reality Kings&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realitykings/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (10)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-20-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:35am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 93&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1238&quot;&gt;nygiants03&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1238&quot;&gt;160&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- 21 great diverese sites access&lt;br /&gt;
- pretty good price for this massive site&lt;br /&gt;
- over 2000 models ( lots of hot ones)&lt;br /&gt;
- 3189 scenes in total&lt;br /&gt;
- usually 3 updates a day&lt;br /&gt;
- great browser options&lt;br /&gt;
- clear well shot videos&lt;br /&gt;
- some of the best reality sites on the net &lt;br /&gt;
- live web cam shows Monday through Friday night&lt;br /&gt;
- downlaod pics in zip files&lt;br /&gt;
- enough content to keep you satisfied for months,&lt;br /&gt;
- full long videos usually over 30 minutes
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- some of older material such as videos and pics are low quality&lt;br /&gt;
- no full scene download on old content&lt;br /&gt;
- some of the guys are annoying ( use the same ones in most of scenes)&lt;br /&gt;
- vip crew no update since april and only 26 scenes&lt;br /&gt;
-team squirt once a month updates 40 scenes&lt;br /&gt;
-big clips and full scnene only downloadable in wmv, 1 minute clips in mpg and wmv&lt;br /&gt;
- the pics are better but nothing special&lt;br /&gt;
- more pornstars then amateurs&lt;br /&gt;
- no high rez pics or dvd quality vids
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					You can browse each site or the whole network by 1. Top Rated Updates 2. Top Rated Models 3. Browse/Search by Keywords  4. Browse by Category&lt;br /&gt;
5. Browse by Model Name  6. View all Updates&lt;br /&gt;
Also extensive search in which you can  browse by 56 categories such as squirting, handjob, dildo, 69, teen asslick, sybian, cameltoe etc..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Huge selection of material. Inclueds welivetogeter which has 203 episode of lesbian sex.  The scenes are incredibly hot and contain even hotter girls. From strap ons to vibrating tongue rings its all lesbian, and its all here.&lt;br /&gt;
284 cumfiesta scnes, 254 8th street latina scenes,&lt;br /&gt;
250 episode milf hunter, 266 mikes apartment scenes,289 big naturals,59 4o inches plus, 243 street blowjob, 116 milf next door, 251 captain stabbin, 114 in the vip and so on.  So bascially this site gives you the webs best milfs,huge natural titties, wildest sex parties, huge asses, teen auditions, flower tucci's site, the awesome money talks site, foreign models, reality blowjobs, and a shit load of more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- This is handdown the best avs on the net in my opinion, there is just so much to choose from and so much going on.  It took me days before I could even browse through all the content.  This is a download porn freak's dream, you will find enough content here to fill your whole database up.  Theres just that much good content.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13378&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reality Kings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7200&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=7200&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:35:58 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
