PU - I Shot Myself - All Activity

RE: qualsite34's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:27:47 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-23-08 02:27am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (108)

To qualsite34 (25):

ok, now i know that i don`t try that site..i am a video lover :)

View Thread (9)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:26:44 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-23-08 02:26am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (108)

To TheRizzo (19):

thanks for info...other viewer told me something about that site, it doesn`t look good if you are in vidoes :(

View Thread (9)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:08:05 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-22-08 05:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by qualsite34 (25)

To ace of aces (108):

The videos are nothing to get excited about. Too short and the quality is not up to todays high definition standards. The photos are the main attraction.

View Thread (9)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:05:47 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-22-08 05:05pm

REVIEW REPLY by qualsite34 (25)

To TheRizzo (19):

I'm guessing some were shot by friends.

View Thread (9)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:49:10 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-22-08 04:49pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To qualsite34 (25):

When I was last in the site that was not my impression at all. There were a good number that definitly came off as shot themselves but to me personally a lot of the shots and quality made me doubt others as well. Just an opposing view for others to look into for the site vs your review. Grain of salt.

View Thread (9)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:47:36 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-22-08 04:47pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To ace of aces (108):

I haven't been in the site in a long time so I would not be best to answer that question Ace.

View Thread (9)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:39:28 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-22-08 08:39am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (108)

To TheRizzo (19):

how much videos ar on that site and have they more hardcore and mastrubation then abby winters?
how is the video quality?

View Thread (9)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:13:56 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-22-08 01:13am

REVIEW REPLY by qualsite34 (25)

To TheRizzo (19):

I don't understand why you would get that impression. Most of the shots are closeups at angles that clearly look like they were taken by the subject.

View Thread (9)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:43:24 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-21-08 03:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To qualsite34 (25):

My one complaint with the site was that a lof of the photos looked like they were not in fact shot by themselves. Sure it could have been on a timer but I still found myself believing it was staged and not true amateur girls shooting themselves which I find incredibly hot.

View Thread (9)

RE: mudman's Review

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:19:44 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

03-21-07 04:19am

REVIEW REPLY by mudman (36)

To BostonPJR (72):

Boston:

Thanks for the compliment. Nobody need agree with me all the time, but to be apreciated just means so much to me and....oh dear, I said I wasn't going to do this. Give me a second.

Okay, as regards your question:

I never tried the lesser memberships with I Feel Myself or I Shot Myself or AbbyWinters. They are money savers, but you the user end up missing stuff. I'm not completely sure I understand why a site would offer partical memberships in the first place, unless it's their alternative to the trial membership. All of that group's Australian sites are good at what they do, including Girls Out West, though AbbyWinters is by far the most popular. And as regards Beautiful Agony, I doubt I'll ever check the site out. Though I like head shots as a part of the whole experience, I am a guy and there's more that i want to see.

With I Feel Myself, you get more. It's like an extention of AbbyWinter's Intimate Moments, but with multiple camera angles. Whereas AbbyWinter's using one camera top shoot the gal getting off, I Feel Myself typically uses three or more, including closer shots of the naughty bites action.

But anyway, with all these sites, I have never tried and wouldn't tried the lesser memberships. It would be too frustrating to long in and not be able to access what's being offered that day, so it's all or nothing for me.

Mudman

View Thread (5)

RE: mudman's Review

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:36:20 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

03-20-07 06:36pm

REVIEW REPLY by BostonPJR (72)

To mudman (36):

Always enjoy your reviews mudman, even when I disagree. I do agree combined with ifeelmyself, this would be a top notch site. Was wondering if you found anything about the join options that seemed unusually difficult. That's what has kept me from joining so far. The sort of half membership vs. full membership option.

View Thread (5)

RE: mudman's Review

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:28:03 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

03-12-07 03:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by SnowDude (214)

To mudman (36):

Thanks for the info Mudman! I have always thought it would be cool, but softcore can get a bit dull after awhile and I was concerned about the limits of what you can see. No doubt there must be some awesome clips though and the site just needs some more time to fill up the archives like you said. If they did combine the sites and provided a small discount, I'd be there in flash. Actually, I'll probably join them at some point anyway, but if you told them that they probably wouldn't think of offering that discount thing I mentioned. ;)

View Thread (5)

RE: mudman's Review

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:41:33 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

03-12-07 05:41am

REVIEW REPLY by mudman (36)

To SnowDude (214):

Snowdude:

I Shot Myself gets a an 84 from me, because it is shot by the girls themselves. It's unique and fun and suprisingly good. There's a wonderful fresh difference and honesty to the whole thing. So removed from the "oh Babe, oh babe" approach to porn or adult nakeness. The pictures and videos are clear, largely crisp and unigue.

The site also gets an 84 from me because it is shot by themselves and the photo option have their limits due to the lengths of the girls' arms. It makes for some fun and great close ups, but the varied of angles and distance is physically limited. The site is also relatively young and therefor doesn't have the volume of major sites, but it is a gas.

So, high on the imaginative and low on the limitations of one's reach. It's a good and fun site to be experienced at least once and for at least one month, just not a great site.

I think it could be considered a great site. if it actually partner up with it's sister site, I Feel Myself. If it were, I Shot and Felt Myself, that would be a 90's cool.

View Thread (5)

RE: mudman's Review

Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:03:44 PST

I Shot Myself (2)

03-09-07 09:03am

REVIEW REPLY by SnowDude (214)

To mudman (36):

I just left a reply on another of your reviews asking for more info which I could exactly replicate here. With a score of 84, I'd really like to hear more!

View Thread (5)

RE: A good site for see and go

Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:24:43 PST

I Shot Myself (2)

02-02-07 05:24pm

COMMENT REPLY by roseman (234)

To crash (16):

lol, seems like a tragedy or something :P

View Thread (1)

I Shot Myself Comment

Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:02:07 PST

I Shot Myself (2)

02-02-07 10:02am

COMMENT by crash (16)

A good site for see and go

"I shot myself" is a very creative and original site. The models gives you situations and video shots you can't see in other places. I like this site but for the same reason I'm agree with Moodman: "it's hard to stay here for long".

Visit I Shot Myself - View Replies - Add Reply