<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Reel Pass - New Comments</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/reelpass/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5186</guid>
		<title>Reel Pass Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5186</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/reelpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/reelpass.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reel Pass&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/reelpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reel Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-20-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:21pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=559&quot;&gt;SnowDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=559&quot;&gt;214&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Amateurs? Really? Are You Sure?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					I apologize if my tone sounds overly accusatory, but I've been very mindful of the categorizations being used by TBP and PU and especially their definition of amateur content. I can't think it's easy finding a concise set of descriptions that allow them to be consistent and make it easy to find similar types of material. I just wanted to preface my complaint with that statement since the folks here have done more to classify sites than any other wbsite I've ever visited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, in what way can this network be classified as amateur? The tour page shows a number of established pornstars and each site has a very glamour feel. One is described as featuring &amp;quot;porn newcomers&amp;quot; and and I suppose that could qualify as amateur, but all the sites feature performers that have names like &amp;quot;Melissa Milano&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Tira Banks&amp;quot; which don't sound like amateurs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I give the folks here all the credit in the world for doing a spectacular job and I feel conflicted about pointing out a detail that in the big picture is pretty damn minor. One of my recent rants even focused on the fact that many sites which claim to be amateur are really not, so finding the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; ones isn't an easy job. All I can say is that this network didn't seem to come even close to being classified as amateur and I wonder if there's something I'm just not seeing. If so, please let me know what it is!
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13210&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reel Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5186&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5186&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:21:58 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4245</guid>
		<title>Reel Pass Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4245</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/reelpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/reelpass.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reel Pass&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/reelpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reel Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-28-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:19am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;142&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;New Speed Report&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					I got a message fra the webmasters that they'd look in to the speed problems. Well now 13.00 AM Westeuropean time it's much better - but not top.&lt;br /&gt;
With IDM I can get up til 450 kb/sec - all my other sites at the same time are 650 kb/sec or more. Maybe they got a lot of traffic....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And well, fellow members, I'll not do a review after all, because the content of this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/reelpass/&quot;&gt;Reel Pass&lt;/a&gt; is the old sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jizzbomb/&quot;&gt;Jizz Bomb&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;New Sensations&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lillatinas/&quot;&gt;Lil' Latinas&lt;/a&gt; and so on - sites that has been around a very long time.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13210&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reel Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4245&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4245&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 04:19:06 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4204</guid>
		<title>Reel Pass Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4204</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/reelpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/reelpass.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Reel Pass&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/reelpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reel Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-27-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:08am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;142&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;What's wrong with the speed here?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					Just noticed the high score on TBP - and joined.&lt;br /&gt;
What a great price - and it looks very good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BUT right now and the last hour i've had the most lousy download-speed. Average 15-20 KB/sec. Same time went to other sites - fine speed 600-650 KB/sec, so nothings wrong on my end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Really hope this is temporary - og else this deal is a bummer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll get back with a review later.&lt;br /&gt;

					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13210&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Reel Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4204&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4204&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 09:08:35 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>